The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

153 protocols using d2 phaser diffractometer

1

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Powder Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction
patterns were measured on a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer using
Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15405 nm). Analysis of the powder
was carried out over the range of 2θ = 10–80° with
a step size of 0.02° and a 0.5 s count time. Analysis was carried
out using MDI Jade software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Advanced Characterization of Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) were obtained using a D2 PHASER diffractometer (from Bruker) with a Cu source (Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.5406 Å) operating at 10 mA and 30 kV in a Bragg–Brentano configuration. The transmittance spectra for the films were collected using a Cary-5000 spectrometer from Agilent. Raman scattering spectroscopy was performed using a DXR Micro-Raman spectrometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific with an excitation laser of 455 nm at 7 mW of power by focusing the laser radiation through a 50X microscope objective lens at 0.2 mW using 5 s as the integration time and 3 scans. Films were examined with a Zeiss field emission SEM (AURIGA model) operating at 1 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Crystalline Materials by XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out on a Bruker D2 PHASER diffractometer equipped with a diffracted beamed monochromator set for Cu Kα (λ = 1.54056 Å) radiation at room temperature in the 2θ range from 10 to 70° with a scan step width of 0.02° and a fixed counting time of 1 s per step. The experimental powder XRD patterns are well in agreement with the simulated ones (Fig. 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of transmission electronic microscope (TEM) image was collected on a Hitachi H-800 spectroscope (Japan) operating at 10 kV. Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) profiles were recorded on a Bruker Vertex 70 (German) from 400 to 4000 cm−1 at a resolution of 2 cm−1, equipped with a temperature- controlled attenuated total reflectance (ATR) device with a ZnSe crystal (Pike Technology). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a ThermoFisher Scientific ESCALAB 250XI (USA) using monochromated Al Kalph source (150 W, 500 μm). The pass energy was 50 eV for survey, and 30 eV for high resolution scans. All binding energies were reference to the C1s peak at 284.4 eV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker D2-phaser diffractometer (German) at 40 mA and 40 kV using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54, 6.88°/min from 5 to 90°). Raman spectra were recorded on a Renishaw inVia Micro-Raman Spectroscopy System (England) equipped with charge-coupled device detector at 633 nm. Specific surface areas and pore size distributions were determined by Brunauer Emmett-Teller (BET) method on Micromeritics ASAP 2460 apparatus (USA) from nitrogen sorption isotherms collected at 77 K. The samples were degassed at 250 °C for 12 h prior to measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Morphological and Structural Analysis of Ru-based Microelectrode

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the fabricated Ru-based microelectrode was investigated using a scanning electron microscope JSM-7001F (SEM, JEOL, Japan) coupled with an energy-dispersive analyzer INCA PentaFETx (Oxford Instruments, UK) to characterize its atomic composition.
The X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) for phase identification of the synthesized ruthenium material was performed on a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer equipped with a LynxEye detector (Bruker-AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) using CuKα (0.1542 nm) radiation in the 2θ angle range of 0°–100°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of BG-AgNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SpectraMax iD3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to measure the UV-Vis absorbance spectra of BG-AgNPs. By using Spectrum one FT–IR Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Instruments, Waltham, MA, USA), the FT-IR measurements for the respective BG extracts and BG-AgNPs were recorded between 4000 and 400 cm−1 using KBr as a reference. D2 phaser diffractometer (Bruker, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation with λ = 1.54 Å was utilized to analyze the powder X-ray diffraction pattern (P-XRD) of as-prepared AgNPs. K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a high-resolution monochromatic Al Kα line as excitation source was used in this study. Zeta Sizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) was used for measuring the Zeta potential for the obtained BG-AgNPs (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CO2 Sequestration Using Carbonic Anhydrase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CO2 sequestration was performed according to the method reported by Jo et al. [12 (link)]. In a disposable cuvette, 50 µL of SspCA solution was mixed with 450 µL of 1 M Tris containing 20 mM CaCl2, pH = 11. Five hundred microliters of CO2-saturated water prepared at 30 °C was added to initiate the sequestration reaction, which was monitored by measuring A600 using a thermostated spectrophotometer (JASCO V-550) at 30 °C. Instead of the 0 °C used for the hydratase activity assay (Section 2.4), CO2-saturated water was prepared at 30 °C because such a temperature is closer to the operation temperature of most CO2-capturing facilities [13 (link),14 (link)]. For characterizing the precipitated CaCO3, the precipitate was collected by filtering it through a 0.45 μm membrane filter, and then dried at 70 °C overnight in an oven before SEM and XRD analysis. The SEM image was obtained with a Hitachi SU8000 scanning electron microscope. The XRD patterns were determined with a Bruker D2 PHASER diffractometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Starch Crystallinity Analysis by XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of starch was performed in a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) using CuKα (30 kV and 10 mA) radiation in the range of 5º≤2θ≤40º, at 1600 V, in a continuous step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Powder X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Cocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PXRD was used to determine the bulk phase purity of each sample. PXRD data for all forms were measured at 293 K on a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer which employs a sealed tube Co X-ray source (λ = 1.78896 Å), operating at 30 kV and 10 mA, and a LynxEye PSD detector in Bragg–Brentano geometry. The powder patterns for the cocrystals are pre­sented in the supporting information, where the experimentally measured pattern is com­pared to the calculated patterns obtained from the single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data, as well as the calculated patterns of its com­ponents using data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 2022.1.0; Groom et al., 2016 ▸ ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PXRD Analysis of Ln(4-cpno)(tfa)3(H2O)·H2O

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PXRD patterns of Ln(4-cpno)(tfa)3(H2O)·H2O were collected using a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer operated at 30 kV and 10 mA. Cu radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) was employed. Patterns were collected in the 5–70° 2θ range using a step size of 0.01° and a step time of 1.4 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!