The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using glass bottom coverslip dishes

1

Mitochondrial Morphology Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated on glass-bottom coverslip dishes (MatTek, AshLand, MA, USA) the day prior to imaging experiments. Cells were washed once with PBS and then incubated with 70 nM of MitoTracker Green FM (Life Technologies, CA, USA) for 20 min at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with phenol red-free medium. All live cell imaging experiments were performed in a live cell imaging chamber in the presence of 5% CO2 at 37°C using the confocal laser microscope LSM 700 (Zeiss Canada, North York, ON, Canada). The LSM 700 is equipped with the PC running LSM ZEN 2012 (Version 8) software. Mitochondria were visualized using laser 488 power (3-6%) and the plan-Apochromat 40×/1.4 or 63×/1.4 NA oil immersion objectives. At least ten images, z-stacks or time-lapse images were obtained for each cell line. The Fiji software [56 (link)] was used to adjust the intensity, split frames and crop images. Mitochondrial length was measured as described previously [57 (link)]. For quantitation, measurements were done using the ZEN 2012 software and at least 94 cells were analysed per experimental condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Drosophila S2 Cell Manipulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Drosophila S2 cells were obtained from Life Technologies and were grown in Schneider's media containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum. In order to process cells for microscopy, S2 cells were spotted onto concanavalin A (Sigma Aldrich) coated coverslips as previously described (Rogers and Rogers, 2008 (link)). For live imaging, cells were spotted onto glass bottom coverslip dishes (MatTek). In order to globally knockdown Sh3px1, S2 cells were treated with either control dsRNAs targeting gfp or with dsRNAs targeting sh3px1. The cells were processed for immunofluorescence or western blot analysis four days after dsRNA treatment. The dsRNAs were prepared and administered to the cells as described previously (Rogers and Rogers, 2008 (link)). DNA was transfected into S2 cells using Effectene (Qiagen) following the directions provided by the manufacturer. The shRNA constructs were also transfected using Effectene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging Gold Nanoparticles in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For gold nanoparticle imaging, 50% of the PEG on the GNP surface was replaced with a PEG-Cy5 complex (excitation 633 nm, emission filter 650 nm LP). The GNPs were prepared otherwise the same as described previously. Glass bottom coverslip dishes (MatTek) were used to facilitate live cell imaging. Cells were first incubated with the Cy5-labelled GNPs for 24 h with the dose of DTX elucidated before. Approximately 1 h before imaging, spheroids with incubated with NucBlue Live ReadyProbe Reagent (Invitrogen) which uses Hoechst 33342 to stain the nuclei. For monolayer, this was also completed 30 min prior to imaging. Image processing was performed using ImageJ (Schindelin et al. 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Microtubules in Live Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A laser scanning confocal microscope (NIKON Eclipse TE2000-U) was used for live cell imaging. For optical imaging, 50% of the PEG on the GNP surface was replaced with PEG-Cy5 complex (excitation 633 nm, emission filter 650 nm LP). For MT imaging, α-tubulin was labelled with a viral transfection stain (CellLight Tubulin-GFP, BacMam 2.0, obtained from Thermo-Fisher). Since most MT stains are taxane-based, we chose this particular viral stain to avoid competing effects with DTX binding sites.
Glass bottom coverslip dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA) were used to facilitate live cell imaging. The media used was FluoroBrite DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). Cells were first incubated with the viral stain for 24 h before adding DTX and optically labelled GNPs. Image processing was performed using ImageJ. It can be seen in images that not all the cells are labelled with the MT stain. This is due to the lower transfection efficiency of the viral stain used for staining MTs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biofilm Visualization by CLSM and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For CLSM, biofilms of wild-type and mutant strains individually and in combination were grown on glass coverslip-bottom dishes (MatTek Co., Ashland, MA) for 24 h; biofilms were rinsed in PBS then stained with a concanavalin-A conjugated to Alexa 647 (Invitrogen) (50 µg/ml) for 45 min at 37°C. Biofilms were visualized using an inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (T2i, Nikon) and images analyzed using Imaris 9.3 Arena software and ImageJ. For SEM, biofilms were grown on coverslips for 24 h at 37°C then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde-2.5% glutaraldehyde, post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, serially dehydrated in ethyl alcohol (30–100%) and critical-point dried. Samples were carbon-coated and observed with Quanta 200 SEM (FEI Co.) and images processed using Adobe Photoshop software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Imaging and Analyzing Bacterial Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For CLSM, biofilms of wild-type and mutant strains individually and in combination were grown on glass coverslip-bottom dishes (MatTek Co., Ashland, MA) for 24 h; biofilms were rinsed in PBS then stained with a concanavalin-A conjugated to Alexa 647 (Invitrogen) (50 μg/ml) for 45 min at 37×C. Biofilms were visualized using an inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (T2i, Nikon) and images analyzed using Imaris 9.3 Arena software and ImageJ. For SEM, biofilms were grown on coverslips for 24 h at 37°C then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde-2.5% glutaraldehyde, post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, serially dehydrated in ethyl alcohol (30–100%) and critical-point dried. Samples were carbon-coated and observed with Quanta 200 SEM (FEI Co.) and images processed using Adobe Photoshop software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!