The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti cd69 h1.2f3

1

Quantifying Tumor Immune Infiltrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors obtained at necropsy were digested in media containing 1 mg/mL collagenase and 20 μg/mL DNAse I (Sigma) for 2 hours at 37°C, and passed through a 100 μm screen to obtain a single-cell suspension. CD8+ T cells were isolated (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC Canada) and then stained with anti-CD3 (17A2, eBioscience), anti-CD8 (53-6.7, eBioscience) and anti-CD69 (H1.2F3, eBioscience) antibodies and DAPI. For PD-L1 quantification, tumor suspensions were stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD Bioscience), anti-CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience), anti-GR1 (1A8, BD Bioscience), anti-F4/80 (BM8.1, Tonbo Biosciences), anti-PD-L1 (MIH5, eBioscience) and DAPI.
For PD-1 quantification on antigen-specific T cells, splenocytes obtained from immunized animals were enriched for CD8+ T cells and stained as above, along with tetramers specific for the SSX2 p41 or p103 epitopes (NIH Tetramer Core Facility, Atlanta GA), anti-PD-1 (J43, BD Bioscience, San Jose CA) and Ghost Dye–780 (Tonbo Bioscience, San Diego, CA).
For in vitro culture studies, cells were treated for 18 hours with 1 μg/mL recombinant mIFNγ (Shenandoah Biotechnology, Warwick PA), or cultured for 48 hours with CD8+ splenocytes isolated from immunized animals, and then collected using non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma), and stained as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analyses were done at the Robert H. Lurie Flow Cytometry Core Facility (RHLCCC) using the Fortessa (BD) flow cytometry system. For surface staining, cells were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for 30 minutes at 4 °C using 1:200 dilutions of each antibody (unless otherwise specified). Cells were washed twice in FACS buffer prior to being analyzed or stained intracellularly using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience). Dead cells were excluded either using DAPI (Life technologies) or LIVE/DEAD® Fixable Dead Cell Stain Kits (Life technologies). Forward and side scatter was used to identify live lymphocytes. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo (version 9.6.2) software (Tree Star). Antibodies against mouse CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD8α (53–6.7), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-GATA3 (L50–823) and anti-CD44 (IM7) were from BD Biosciences. An antibody against mouse CD25 (PC61) was from BioLegend. Antibodies against mouse GITR (DTA-1), anti-CTLA4 (UC10–4B9), anti-Foxp3 (FJK-165), anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2), anti-IL17A (eBio17B7), anti-IL4 (11B11), anti-RORγt (B2D), anti-T-bet (eBio4B10) and anti-CD69 (H1.2F3) were from eBioscience. An antibody against mouse Neuropilin-1 was from R&D Systems. CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit (Thermo Scientific) for flow cytometry was used to track cell proliferation in in vitro Treg suppression assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping of Murine Splenocytes and Thymocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse splenocytes and thymocytes were prepared from pooled thymus or spleen. Thymic and splenic cells were pre-incubated with Fc-block before staining with other antibodies. The mouse antibodies used included anti-CD4 (RM4–5, eBioscience); anti-CD8 (53–6.7, eBioscience); anti-CD45.1 (A20, BioLegend), anti-CD45.2 (104, eBioscience); anti-CD25 (PC61.5, eBioscience); anti-CD69 (H1.2F3, eBioscience); anti-CD24 (M1/69, eBioscience); anti-Helios (22F6, eBioscience) before flow cytometry analysis. For intracellular staining of Ki-67 (B56, BD), pSTAT5 (47/Stat5(pY694), BD) and Foxp3 (NRRF-30, eBioscience), cells were fixed and permeabilized with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™ Fixation / Permeabilization Solution Kit (554,714, BD) and stained according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The CD4+ T cells from the thymus and spleen of WT or RelB−/− mice were analyzed by flow cytometry and gated as shown in the Supplementary Figure 1. The samples were analyzed using a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer and FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc). All single-cell suspensions from the tissues were stained with Abs diluted in PBS containing 2% FCS for 30 min on ice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All infected and uninfected tissues were dissociated by collagenase digestion as described previously 40 (link). Cell suspensions were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The following antibodies were used for cell surface staining: anti-CD11b (clone M1/70), anti-CD11c (clone N418), anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-MHCII (M5/114.15.2), anti-CD19 (ebio1D3), anti-NK1.1 (PK136), anti-siglecH (ebio440c), anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-CD4 (GK.5), anti-CD8 (53-6.7) and anti-CD69 (H1.2F3) were purchased from eBioscience, anti-Ly6G (1A8) was obtained from BD Pharmingen, anti-Ly6-B2 antibody (7/4) from AbD Serotec, and CCR2 (475301) from R&D Systems. For intracellular staining: anti-iNOS antibody was purchased from Millipore, and anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22) was purchased from BD Pharmingen. Cell suspensions from collagenase-digested tissue were stained for cell surface markers and permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Pharmingen). For detection of intracellular TNF-α, cells were also treated ex vivo with GolgiPlug (BD Pharmingen) for 6 h at 37°C in complete RPMI medium prior to cell surface staining and stained according to the manufacturers instructions. Acquisitions were performed with a BD LSRII, and data were analyzed with the FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immune Cell Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following staining reagents were used: anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD4 (H129.19), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD45R (RA3-6B2), anti-PD-1 (29F.1A12), anti-PD-L1 (10F.9G2), anti-ICOSL (HK5.3), anti-CD40 (HM40-3), anti-CD40L (MR1), anti-CXCR4 (L276F12), and anti-IL-4 (11b11) were from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA); anti-CD19 (eBio1D3), anti-ICOS (7E.17G9), anti-IL-21 (mhalx21), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3), and anti-GL7 (GL-7) were from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA, USA); anti-Bcl-6 (K112-91), anti-CXCR5 (2G8), and anti-Fas (Jo2) were from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). PNA (B-1075; Vector Laboratories, Burlington, ON, Canada) was used for staining germinal center B cells and MOMA-1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for staining MZ macrophages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for flow cytometric analysis: purified anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2) was obtained from BD. Fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies anti-CD45.2 (104), anti-CD45.1 (A20), anti-CD8a (53.6.7), anti-CD103 (2E7), and anti-CD69 (H1.2F3) were purchased from eBioscience. PE-conjugated H-2Kb/B8R20 and H-2Kb/OVA257 tetramers were provided by D.H. Busch (Technical University Munich). All antibody incubation steps were performed on ice for 30 min. Dead cells were excluded by staining with propidium iodide (Molecular Probes) immediately before analysis. Samples were acquired on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD) and FlowJo software (Tree Star) was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with PBS containing 0.5% BSA and incubated for 30 minutes on ice with the following antibodies: anti-CD4 (RM-4.5; eBioscience), anti-CD8 (53.6.7; BD), anti-CD44 (IM.7; BD), anti-CD25 (PC61; BD), anti-CD62L (MEL14; Biolegend), anti-TCRβ (H57-597; eBioscience), anti-TCRγδ (BD), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3; eBioscience), anti-CD11b (M1/70; BD), anti-Gr1 (RB6-8C5; eBioscience) and anti-HSA (M1/69, eBioscience). Cells were then washed in PBS with 0.5% BSA and data was collected using a Fortessa cytometer (BD Bioscience) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR).
In the case of intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the Foxp3 buffer staining kit (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions prior to staining for intracellular Foxp3 expression using an anti-Foxp3 antibody (FJK-16s, BD), for 30 minutes.
For Annexin V staining, cells were washed with PBS and stained with BD Pharmingen Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The detection of BrdU was performed using BD Pharmingen BrdU Flow Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All infected and uninfected tissues were dissociated by collagenase digestion as described previously 40 (link). Cell suspensions were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. The following antibodies were used for cell surface staining: anti-CD11b (clone M1/70), anti-CD11c (clone N418), anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-MHCII (M5/114.15.2), anti-CD19 (ebio1D3), anti-NK1.1 (PK136), anti-siglecH (ebio440c), anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-CD4 (GK.5), anti-CD8 (53-6.7) and anti-CD69 (H1.2F3) were purchased from eBioscience, anti-Ly6G (1A8) was obtained from BD Pharmingen, anti-Ly6-B2 antibody (7/4) from AbD Serotec, and CCR2 (475301) from R&D Systems. For intracellular staining: anti-iNOS antibody was purchased from Millipore, and anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22) was purchased from BD Pharmingen. Cell suspensions from collagenase-digested tissue were stained for cell surface markers and permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Pharmingen). For detection of intracellular TNF-α, cells were also treated ex vivo with GolgiPlug (BD Pharmingen) for 6 h at 37°C in complete RPMI medium prior to cell surface staining and stained according to the manufacturers instructions. Acquisitions were performed with a BD LSRII, and data were analyzed with the FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Activated Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface staining was performed using the following antibodies: anti-CD11b (M1/70, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD11c (N418, BioLegend) anti-CD3 (17A2, eBioscience), anti-CD49b (DX5, eBioscience), anti-CD69 (H1.2 F3, eBioscience), anti-CD86 (GL-1, BioLegend), anti-MHC-II (M5/114.15.2, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-NK1.1 (PK136, BD Bioscience). Dead cells were excluded from analysis (positive for fixable viability dye, eBioscience). For detection of activated T cells splenocytes were stained with anti-CD4 (GK1.5, eBioscience), anti-CD8 (53–6.7, eBioscience), anti-CD43 (1B11, BioLegend) and anti-CD62L (MEL-14, eBioscience). Intracellular IFN-γ (XMG1.2, Miltenyi Biotec), IL-2 (JES6-5H4, Miltenyi Biotec) and TNF-α (MP6-XT22, BioLegend) staining was performed as described [28 (link),29 (link)]. Data were acquired on LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and analyses were performed using FACSDiva (BD Bioscience) and Flow Jo (Tree Star, USA) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!