The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using meropenem

1

Metallo-β-Lactamase Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL) producing strains, test strips containing: Imipenem (IMI)/Imipenem + EDTA (IMD) or Meropenem (MRP)/Meropenem + EDTA (MRD) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abbruzzi, Italy) were used; the procedure was the same as for the detection of ESBL-positive strains. K. pneumoniae ATCC® BAA-1705 was used as a positive control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phenotypic Detection of ESBL and Carbapenemase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. coli isolates that presented resistance to third generation cephalosporins (cefoperazone, ceftiofur) were subjected to the double disk synergy test (DDST) for the phenotypic confirmation of ESBL production, according to EUCAST guidelines [26 ]. A positive result was indicated when the inhibition zones around any of the cephalosporin disks were augmented or when a “keyhole” was formed in the direction of the disk containing clavulanic acid.
Microorganisms that were resistant to imipenem were assessed for phenotypic carbapenemase production using MIC test strips containing meropenem plus phenylboronic acid and meropenem plus ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Liofilchem). Isolates that had a ratio meropenem/meropenem plus phenylboronic acid ≥8 or meropenem/meropenem plus EDTA ≥8 were considered positive for class A or class B carbapenemases, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolates were initially processed using disk-diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing for amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, doripenem, gentamicin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, netilmicin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and tobramycin with Oxoid (Basingstoke, United Kingdom) disks. Complementarily, an in-house broth microdilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for amikacin gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, colistin, polymyxin B, tigecycline, and ceftazidime-avibactam, and all salts were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), except for avibactam, which was donated by Pfizer Inc. To complete the antimicrobial susceptibility panel, novel antimicrobials/combinations were evaluated with Liofilchem (Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) MIC test strips for ceftolozanetazobactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, imipenem–relebactam, cefoperazone–sulbactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, eravacycline, and fosfomycin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [9 ], an antibiogram assay was performed on the isolated K. pneumoniae colonies. The antibiotic discs contained ampicillin (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), cefixime (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), minocycline (30 µg), tigecycline (15 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (100/10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), doripenem (10 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), colistin (10 µg), and fosfomycin (200 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom) [4 , 10 ].
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of imipenem, meropenem, and colistin for isolates resistant to carbapenems was determined by using E-test (Liofilchem, Italy) according to the 2021 CLSI guidelines [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by employing disk diffusion, gradient test, and broth microdilution test according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations, 2021 [43 ]. The disks impregnated with the following antimicrobial agents were tested: imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ceftazidime (10 µg), cefepime (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (30/6 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ticarcillin (75 µg), ceftazidime-avibactam (10–4 µg), and ceftolozane/tazobactam (38–10 µg) (BioRad, Watford, UK). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for colistin, imipenem, and meropenem were evaluated by ComASP Colistin (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy) and Gradient strip test (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy), respectively. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as the control strain in the antibiotic susceptibility testing. MDR P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent of three or more different classes. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa were defined as a subset of MDR isolates that tested non-susceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent of five different classes. P. aeruginosa was defined as pandrug-resistant (PDR) when the organism was resistant to all tested agents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 18 antibiotics were used in the susceptibility test, by disk diffusion, with amoxicillin, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftiofur, cefepime, ceftaroline, aztreonam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, tigecycline, tetracycline, fosfomycin, chloramphenicol, and nitrofurantoin (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). The interpretation was performed according to CLSI [45 ]. tigecycline resistance was interpreted according to EUCAST [46 ]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control. In accordance with EUCAST standards, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for colistin was determined by the broth microdilution method [46 ]. MDR profiles were determined according to standard criteria [26 (link)]. ESBL detection was performed using the double-disk synergy test (DDST) [45 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales with blaOXA-48

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enterobacterales isolates carrying blaOXA-48-like genes were obtained between 2013 and 2020 from clinical samples obtained at the University Hospital Cologne. They were detected during routine diagnostics due to elevated carbapenem MICs, and blaOXA-48 was verified via the automated PCR system Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) (18 (link)). Only one isolate per species for each patient was included in the study. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the Micronaut-S broth microdilution panel (Merlin, Bornheim, Germany). Due to a small MIC range for carbapenems in this panel, susceptibility testing was complemented by gradient tests for ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates was performed using Kirby-Bauer method according to the clinical and laboratory standard institute (CLSI, 2011) guidelines. The following antimicrobial agents were tested: imipenem 10 µg, meropenem 10 µg, polymyxin-B 300 U, gentamicin 10 µg, ceftriaxone 30 µg, colistin 10 µg, piperacillin 100 µg, piperacillin-tazobactam 100/10 µg, cefepime 30 µg, tobramycin 10 µg, amikacin 30 µg, tetracycline 30 µg, ciprofloxacin 5 µg, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 1.25/23.75 µg, ceftazidime 30 µg, rifampin 5 µg, tigecycline 15 µg, aztreonam 30 µg and ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 µg), (MAST, Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as control strains (20 ). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of imipenem, meropenem, colistin and tigecycline were determined by E-test strips (Liofilchem, Italy). Measures were obtained according to the CLSI guidelines. The US food and rug drug administration-approved criteria and Jones criteria were used for Enterobacteriacea and tigecycline breakpoint, respectively (21 (link), 22 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Screening Carbapenem Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven carbapenem resistance genes (blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaSPM, blaAIM, blaDIM, blaGIM, blaSIM, blaKPC, blaBIC, and blaOXA–48) (Poirel et al., 2011 (link)) were screened using PCR detection from the presumptive carbapenemase-producing bacteria. The amplicons were sequenced (Macrogen) and identified using NCBI BLAST1. For the screened carbapenemase-producing bacteria, MDR to 16 antibiotics was determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and resistance to colistin was determined using broth dilution methods. For MDR, the following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin-sulbactam (10/10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg) ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (2 mg/L), doripenem (10 μg), fosfomycin (200 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (10 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Resistance to the antibiotics was determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (Clinical Laboratory Standars and Institue, 2016 ). Subsequently, MICs of 16 antibiotics for E. coli strain N7 were evaluated using the broth dilution method (Hasselmann, 2003 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pellet was dissolved in sterile physiological saline (Polpharma) to obtain a suspension with an optical density of 0.5 McFarland. The prepared suspension was plated on Mueller Hinton Agar with 5.0% horse blood and β-NAD (MHF, Graso) and then gradient strips with antibiotics, i.e., penicillin (0.016-256 μg/ml) (Liofilchem), ampicillin (0.016-256 μg/ml) (Liofilchem), meropenem (0.002-32 μg/ml) (Liofilchem), erythromycin (0.016-256 μg/ml) (Liofilchem) and trimethoprim*/sulfamethoxazole (1/19) (co-trimoxazole) (0.002-32* μg/ml) (Liofilchem) were applied. After 20-h incubation at 35 °C MICs (based on the eclipse-shaped inhibition zone) were determined. The results were interpreted in accordance with EUCAST v. 13.0 recommendations [33 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!