The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Api strep

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in France

The API strep is a compact and easy-to-use identification system for the presumptive identification of Streptococcus species from cultured isolates. It provides a standardized method for the biochemical identification of Streptococcus species through a series of pre-inoculated test strips.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using api strep

1

Pneumococcal Vaccination Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material to microbiological tests included nasal and pharyngeal swabs collected from patients before a planned vaccination against S. pneumoniae (0m-1st test) and 1-2 months after vaccination (Im-2nd test). The swabs were collected using a kit with a transport medium, and next a culture of microorganisms was performed on the following media: Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood, Mannitol salt agar, McConkey, Chocolate agar, and Sabouraud (bioMerieux, France), and the phenotypic identification with kits: the APINH, the APIStrep, the APIE, the APINE APIStaph, and the API AUX (bioMerieux, France). The numeric code of the identified strain was read out with the apiweb™ program (bioMerieux, France). The tests were conducted according to the routinely applied microbiological diagnostics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Identification of Streptococcal Mastitis Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milk samples were transferred with a calibrated loop (0.01 ml) onto Columbia agar (Oxoid, Great Britain) and Edwards medium (Oxoid, Great Britain), both supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 ± 2 h under aerobic conditions. The grown cultures were examined microscopically after Gram staining, and the phenotypic traits were analysed (i.e., type of haemolysis, esculin hydrolysis, catalase production, CAMP reaction). For further analysis, only G+, catalase-negative cocci were selected. The final identification was performed using the commercial latex agglutination test Streptococcal Grouping Kit (Oxoid, Great Britain), API strep (bioMérieux, France) and PCR. All strains used in this study are summarized in Table 1.

Strains used in this study

Speciesn
S.uberis53
S. dysgalactiae41
S. agalactiae27
Other Streptococci14
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Urine Culture Isolation and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clean catch mid-stream urine samples were collected from all participants using a wide-mouthed sterile-capped container. The specimen was promptly transported to the microbiology laboratory and cultured within one hour of collection. We used a 0.001 ml calibrated wire loop to inoculate samples onto Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient (CLED) agar, blood agar, and chocolate agar (plates (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, United Kingdom) and incubate at 37°C for 24–48 hours. Colony counts yielding bacterial growth of 105/ml of urine were regarded as significant for bacteriuria. Colony characteristics, Gram reaction, and biochemical reactions were used to identify bacterial isolates [29 (link), 30 ]. For the identification of Gram-negative bacteria, oxidase test, lactose fermentation, and hydrogen sulfur (H2S) production in Kligler's iron agar (KIA) test, urease test, citrate test, and indole test were used. Gram positives were also identified using a type of haemolysis, a catalase test, and a coagulase test. Isolated bacteria were later confirmed using API 20E and API 20NE (bioMerieux) for Gram-negative bacteria and API-staph (bioMerieux) and API- Strep (bioMerieux) for Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibacterial Evaluation of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty-seven bacterial strains, 23 Gram positive (22 strains of Staphylococcus spp., 1 of Streptococcus constellatus) and 24 Gram negative (16 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 6 of Escherichia coli, 1 of Serratia marcescens, 1 of Klebsiella pneumoniae) were tested with the three EOs and the mixture.
All strains were previously cultured from ears of dogs affected by otitis externa. After isolation, the strains were typed using API Staph, API Strep, API 20E, and API 20NE systems (BioMerieux, Milan, Italy) in relation to microbiological and Gram staining characters. To discriminate between S. aureus and S. pseudointermedius, a multiplex-PCR assay described by Sasaki et al. [16 (link)] was employed.
The strains were stored at −80 °C in glycerol broth. Before being employed in the antibacterial activity analyses, each isolate was cultured in brain hearth infusion broth (BHIB, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) at 37 °C for 24 h. Cultures of 1–2 × 107 CFU/mL, corresponding to 0.5 McFarland standard, were used in the tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Identification of Enterococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Feces (10 g) were mixed with 90 mL of a tryptone salt broth (Oxoid). Suspensions were transferred to sterile stomacher bags and homogenized for 2 min in a stomacher blender. Serial dilutions were made in tryptone salt broth. Dilutions were inoculated in Slanetz-Bartley Agar (Oxoid) (37 °C, 24–48 h). Up to four red-colored colonies were selected to collect a variety of enterococcus strains. For further identification, catalase, growth in Bile Esculin Agar (Oxoid), and trypticase soy broth + 6.5% NaCl tests were done. If there was any doubt about the identification, the API STREP (BioMérieux, France) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Urine Culture Protocol for UTI Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine samples showing a colony count more than 104 cfu/mL were considered to be positive for UTI. UTI isolates were identified following standard biochemical tests. Results were not considered for more than two clinical isolates obtained from the same patient and the sample was considered to be contaminated. No-growth plates were considered as sterile.
For positive urine cultures, identifications were done using automated system Microscan (Walkaway 40 SI, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Sacramento, CA). Panels used for Gram-negative bacteria (NC34 and NC53) and for Gram-positive bacteria (PC21) were obtained from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics (Sacramento, CA). For confirmation, further biochemical tests were done for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates (API E20, API strep, and API staph) supplied by bioMérieux, (Durham, NC, USA).
QC strains (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, and Candida albicans ATCC 10231) were supplied by American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were cultured using standard microbiological methods as described previously (29 ). S. agalactiae colonies were initially identified by colony morphology, type of hemolysis on agar medium with 5% sheep blood, Gram-staining (Color Gram 2 kit; bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), and a catalase test. The growth of catalase-negative isolates was assessed on Edwards medium with Chodkowski’s modification (29 ). Subsequently, S. agalactiae isolates were distinguished from other esculin-negative streptococci using a CAMP test (29 ). In cases of doubt, API Strep (bioMérieux) tests were additionally used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!