The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Acclaim c18 column

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Acclaim C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. The column features a stationary phase of chemically modified silica particles, providing excellent chromatographic resolution and reproducibility.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using acclaim c18 column

1

Serum Retinol Measurement by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five-milliliter blood samples were collected by brachial venipuncture into amber tubes with gel, centrifuged, and stored in dry ice at a temperature of −20 °C for transportation to IMIP’s translational research laboratory. Serum retinol measurement (a dependent variable) was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), as recommended by the WHO [9 ,19 ], according to the technique established by Furr et al. [20 ]. The analysis was performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with an Acclaim C18 column (5 µm × 4.6 mm × 250 mm) coupled with a C18 Nucleosil guard column, and an injection volume of 20 µL. Detection was performed using a UV detector (Dionex UltiMate 3000 Variable Wavelength Detector) at 325 nm. Retinyl acetate obtained from Sigma was used as a standard, peak retention was 3.6 min, and the mobile phase flow was 1.5 mL/min. The cut-off points used for the classification of retinol levels were: deficient: <0.35 μmo/L; low: ≥0.35 and <0.70 μmol/L; acceptable: ≥0.70 and <1.05 μmol/L; and adequate ≥1.05 μmol/L [14 ]. VAD was defined as retinol levels <0.70 μmol/L, as recommended by the WHO [9 ,19 ]; therefore, the cumulative prevalence of vitamin A levels classified as deficient or low (serum retinol levels <0.70 μmol/L) was adopted as the endpoint for the univariate and multivariate analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Phytocannabinoids and Terpenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Erez extract (15% THC) and Avidekel extract (30% CBD) were provided by Tikun Olam Ltd. (Tel-Aviv, Israel). Avidekel and Erez oil preparations used in the study were analyzed for phytocannabinoids (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2, respectively) and terpenes (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3, respectively). CoA Terpene profile was provided by Tikun Olam Ltd. (Tel-Aviv, Israel), and phytocannabinoid analysis was performed by the laboratory for the Mass Spectrometry and Chromatography, the Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel. Briefly, quantitative analyses of phytocannabinoids in plants and cannabis preparations were carried out using the Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS HPLC, which consisted of a quaternary pump, autosampler, column department, and diode-array detector. Analytes were separated on Acclaim C18 column (250 × 3 mm, 3 µm, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using acetonitrile/water with 0.1% acetic acid gradient. Standards of phytocannabinoids used for identification and quantitative analysis were purchased from Restek (Bellefonte, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UHPLC-Q Exactive Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One microlitre of sample (1 μl) was analysed on a UHPLC system of the Ultimate 3000 series RSLC (Dionex, Dionex Softron GmbH, Germering, Germany) connected to a Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Separation in the UHPLC system was achieved on an Acclaim C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 2.2 μm, Dionex) with a flow rate of 300 μl min−1 in a binary solvent system of water and acetonitrile (Merck, hypergrade for LC‐MS), both containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (eluent additive for LC‐MS, Sigma‐Aldrich). ESI source parameters were set to 3 kV for spray voltage at a sheath gas flow of 35 and Aux gas flow of 7 l h−1. The voltage in the transfer capillary was set to 35 V at a capillary temperature of 325°C. The samples were measured in positive ion mode in the mass range of m/z 100–1200 using 140 000 m/Δm resolving power in the Orbitrap mass analyser. Data were interpreted using xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For statistical analysis, the raw spectra were converted to mzXML format using the MS Convert feature of proteowizard 3.0.3750. Subsequently, data processing was carried out with r studio 0.96.316 using the Bioconductor XCMS package. The resulting list (mz, mzmin, mzmax, rt, rtmin, rtmax and peak intensities/areas) was saved in csv file format and uploaded to metaboanalyst V3.0 (www.metaboanalyst.ca).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Metabolite Analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the exact mass of candidate metabolites, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS) was performed with an Ultimate 3000 series RSLC (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and a LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). UHPLC was used applying an Acclaim C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 2.2 μm particle size, Dionex). Separation was accomplished using a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in ultrapure water as solvent A and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile as solvent B with a flow rate of 300 μl/min at 25°C. The gradient was as follows: 0–100% (v/v) B (15 min), 100% B (5 min), 100–0% (v/v) B (0.1 min), 0% B (5 min). ESI source parameters were set to 4,000 V for spray voltage, 35 V for transfer capillary voltage at a capillary temperature of 275°C. Samples were measured in positive and negative ionization mode at a mass range of m/z 50–1000 using 30,000 m/Δm resolving power in the Orbitrap mass analyzer. Data were evaluated and interpreted using XCALIBUR software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Nail Testosterone Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of testosterone in our pooled nails extract was confirmed by LC-MS/MS. Extracted nail samples were dissolved in methanol, spiked with internal standards, and filtered through 0.2 µm PVDF filter. Samples were analyzed on a system which consisted of Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS HPLC coupled to Q Exactive Plus hybrid FT mass spectrometer equipped with APCI ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). HPLC separations were carried out using Acclaim C18 column (2.1×150 mm, particle size 2.2 µm, Dionex) employing linear water/methanol gradient. Mass spectrometer was operated in positive ionization mode, ion source parameters were as follows: corona discharge needle 5µA, capillary temperature 300⁰C, sheath gas rate (arb) 50, and auxiliary gas rate (arb) 10. Mass spectra were acquired in the Parallel Reaction Monitoring mode, and resolving power was set to 70.000. The system control and data analysis was executed by the Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC-MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system was performed using a Thermo Scientific™ Acclaim™ C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.2 μm, 0.2 ml min−1) with gradient elution. UV spectra were recorded on a DAD detector with wavelength ranging from 190 to 400 nm. The MS was measured on a Bruker amazon SL Ion Trap mass spectrometry (Bruker Corporation) using the standard ESI source. Mass spectra were acquired in centroid mode ranging from 100 to 1500 m/z with positive‐mode electrospray ionization and auto MS2 fragmentation. HPLC parameters were as follows: solvent A, H2O with 0.2% (v/v) TFA; solvent B, 0.1% (v/v) TFA in acetonitrile (ACN); gradient at a constant flow rate of 0.2 ml min−1, 0–5 min, 5% (v/v) B; 5–45 min, 5%–95% (v/v) B; 45–50 min, 95% (v/v) B; or 0–5 min, 5% (v/v) B; 5–25 min, 5%–95% (v/v) B; 25–30 min, 95% (v/v) B detection by UV spectroscopy at 190–400 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Analytes via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples’ supernatants were injected into an Acclaim C18 column (2.2 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 38 °C. Separations were performed at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min using a mobile phase of phosphate buffer (PB; 0.05 mM EDTA, 1.7 mM orthosilicic acid [OSA], 90.0 mM Na2HPO4, 50.0 mM citric acid). The voltage for the detection cell was set at +700 mV, with the voltage for the guard cell set at +750 mV. The data were collected and analyzed by ChemStation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Peaks and relative concentrations were identified by comparison with known external standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Quantification of Platelet Sialic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sialic acids were released from platelet GPIbα by treating the extract with acetic acid (2N final concentration) at 80°C for 3 h, filtered through a 10kD centrifugal filter (Microcon), and dried using a vacuum concentrator (SpeedVac). The released sialic acids were labeled with 1,2-diamino-4, 5-methylenedioxybenzene (DMB, Sigma Aldrich) for 2.5 h at 50°C [65 (link)]. HPLC analysis was performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 system with an Acclaim C18 column (ThermoFisher) under isocratic elution in 7% methanol, 7% acetonitrile, and 86% water. Sialic acid standards were derived from commercially available bovine submaxillary mucin, Neu5Gc and Neu5Ac (Sigma Aldrich) as well as from normal horse serum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Catecholamine Measurement in Ocular Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were killed with CO2 at the end of the eighth week. Their vitreous, retina, and RPE were dissected from the eyecups carefully under a dissecting microscope and quick frozen in liquid nitrogen. These samples were later homogenized with 0.1 N HClO4 containing 0.1% sodium metabisulfite to prevent the oxidation of catecholamine and the levels of 5-HT, NE and E were measured by HPLC as follows: The samples’ supernatants were injected into an Acclaim C18 column (2.2 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 38°C. Separations were performed at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min by using a mobile phase of phosphate buffer containing 0.05 EDTA, 1.7 orthosilicic acid (OSA), 90.0 Na2HPO4, 50.0 citric acid(all concentrations were expressed in mM). The voltage of detection cell side was set at +700 mV with the voltage of guard cell side set at +750 mV. The data collected were analyzed by ChemStation (Agilent Technologies). Peaks and relative concentrations were identified in comparison with the known external standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Profiling of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analyses of the compounds isolated from the DCM fraction of WDC were carried out via an HPLC analysis using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 system equipped with a binary pump, auto-sampler, column oven and diode array UV/VIS detector (DAD, Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA). The chromatograms of the detector were registered using a Chromeleone software system (Ver. 7, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The chromatographic separation was achieved on an Acclaim® C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Thermo Scientific) using 0.1% TFA water (v/v); solvent A and acetonitrile; solvent B as the mobile phases at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The HPLC elution condition was optimized as follows: 0–60 min, 10–70% B; 60–70 min, 100% B. The column oven and auto-sampler injection volume were wet to 40 °C and 10 μL, respectively. The detected wavelength was set at 280 nm and the total run time was 70 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!