The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti icos c398.4a

1

Profiling Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze lymphoid populations within the tumor from one patient (patient 4), the fresh tumor tissue was finely minced with scissors and filtered through a nylon membrane, and a single-cell suspension was purified over a Ficoll–Hypaque density gradient. Cells were stained with the following anti-human antibodies: anti-αβTCR (IP26, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD8 (OKT8, eBioscience), anti-CD44 (IM7, eBioscience), anti-PD-1 (eBioJ105, eBioscience), anti-CD27 (O323, eBioscience), anti-CD20 (2H7, eBioscience), anti-CD1c (L161, eBioscience), anti-γδTCR (B1, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD4 (OKT4, BioLegend), anti-CD28 (CD28.2, BioLegend), anti-FAS (DX2, BioLegend), anti-ICOS (C398.4A, BioLegend), anti-IgM (MHM-88, BioLegend), anti-CD21 (B-ly4, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-CD23 (M-L233, BD Biosciences), and anti-IgD (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA). Flow cytometry was performed using a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed via FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry-Based Immune Cell Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry cell sorting, cells were stained with anti-CD4 (RPA-T4) and anti-CD3 (SK7) antibodies (BioLegend); anti-CD4 (RPA-T4), anti-CD3 (SK7) and anti-HLA-DR (L243) or with anti-CD4 (SK3), anti-CD3 (UCHT1), and anti-CD14 (63D3) according to the sorting strategy. Gating strategies are depicted in Supplementary Figs 13. Sorted populations cell purity was routinely >98%. For intracellular cytokines assays sorted CD3highCD4high, rested for at least 3 h, were stimulated with 5 μg mL−1 of anti-CD3 (UCHT1, BioLegend) and 2 μg mL−1 of anti-ICOS (C398.4 A, BioLegend), crosslinked with 5 μg/mL anti-mouse IgG1 (BioLegend) plus 10 μg mL−1 anti-hamster IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C in the presence of Brefeldin-A (Life Technologies) for 14 h. Cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde 1% (Sigma-Aldrich) and permeabilized with saponin (Carl Roth). Antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Data 2. When indicated 1.7 μg mL−1 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich), TNC (Merck Millipore), or cell-depleted synovial fluid (SF) was added. For TLR4 blocking, CLI-095 (InvivoGen) was added at 10 μg mL−1 1 h before stimulation. Cell sorting was performed in a BD FACSAria III instrument (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry for Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified anti-mouse CD16/32 (clone 93, BioLegend) was used for Fc receptor blocking.
For in vitro cell IR experiments, anti-CD73 (REA778, Miltenyi Biotec) was used at the appropriate dilutions.
For tumor-infiltrating immune cell staining, anti-CD45 (REA737), anti-CD4 (REA604), anti-CD8a (REA983), anti-NK1.1 (REA1162), anti-FoxP3 (REA788), anti-CD73 (REA778, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD19 (1D3, BD), anti-CD11b (M1/70) and anti-iCOS (C398.4A, BioLegend) antibodies were used. For membrane staining, cells were incubated with the antibody panel at the adapted concentrations for 20 min at 4°C. For FoxP3 staining, the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (BD Biosciences) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were washed in FACS buffer and resuspended in 200 µL FACS buffer before acquisition. Samples were acquired on an LSR Fortessa X20 (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) with FACSDiva software, and data were analyzed with FlowJo V.10.0.7 software (Tree Star, Ashland, Oregon, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocytes were stained with the following anti-human antibodies: anti-CD4 (OKT4), anti-CD49d (9F10), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD20 (L27), anti-CD27 (M-T271), anti-CD43 (MEM-59), anti-CD62L (DREG-56), anti-CXCR5 (J252D4), anti-PD-1 (EH12.2H7), anti-CCR7 (G043H7), anti-CXCR3 (G025H7), anti-CD56 (5.1H11), and anti-ICOS (C398.4A) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Flow cytometric analyses were performed using a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Both CD49dhigh and CD49dlow CD4+ T cells were sorted using a BD FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) after staining with anti-CD4 and anti-CD49d antibodies. Human B cell populations (naïve B cells, CD20+CD27CD43; memory B cells, CD20+CD27+CD43; and B-1 cells, CD20+CD27+CD43+) were sorted after staining with anti-CD20, anti-CD27, and anti-CD43 (3 (link)). The purities of the sorted cell populations were routinely ≥98%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!