The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using c18 solid phase extraction cartridge

1

Extraction and Quantification of Free and Bound Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For free phenolic compound extraction, freeze-dried samples (1 g) were macerated in methanol: HCL (1‰)–water 80:20 (v/v) at 4 °C for 16 h. Subsequently, they were centrifuged at 4000 g and 4 °C for 20 min. The extraction process was performed twice. The extracts were combined and concentrated at 30 °C under a vacuum for methanol evaporation. For the extraction of bound phenolics, the residues from the above free phenolic compounds extraction were flushed with N2 and hydrolyzed directly with 10 mL of 4 M NaOH at room temperature for 1 h with shaking. The mixture was acidified to pH 2 with concentrated HCl (8M), centrifuged at 4000 g and 4 °C for 20 min, and extracted three times with 1:1 ethyl ether: ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were evaporated to dryness at 30 °C under a vacuum. For phenolic analysis, the dry extracts were dissolved in 10 mL of water. For purification, an aliquot (4 mL) was passed through a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), and phenolic compounds were eluted with methanol. Afterward, extracts were concentrated under a vacuum in a rotary evaporator (30 °C) and then dissolved in aqueous 0.1% TFA:acetonitrile (90:10 v/v) for phenolic compound analysis. The total content of phenolic compounds was obtained as the sum of free and bound phenolics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Endogenous Plant Metallothioneins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The endogenous Se in plant tissues was extracted by the method as reported earlier [11 (link)]. The measurement of endogenous plant MT was carried out with some modifications [47 (link)]. Fresh samples (0.5 g) of leaf and root were grounded and homogenized in 5 mL methanol containing 50 ng mL− 1 [2H6]-MT (Toronto Research Chemicals Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) which was used as internal standard. After shaking the homogenate overnight in the dark at 4 °C and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10 min. Later after transferring the supernatant into a new tube, the segments were again extracted with 2 mL of methanol and mixed with the fraction of supernatant. For the purification of MT, the supernatant was transferred to the C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Then extracted material was rigorously dehydrated under nitrogen. The obtained residue was dissolved in 0.5 mL of methanol (70%) and subjected to HPLC electrospray ionization/MS-MS analysis on an Agilent 6460 triple quad LC/MS with an Agilent-XDB18 column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, an Agilent Technologies, Frankfurt, Germany). The recovery rate was estimated by the quantification of [2H6]-MT as an internal standard [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Melatonin Extraction from Cabbage Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melatonin was extracted from cabbge seeds and seedlings according to the method described in our previous work (Zhang H. J. et al., 2014 (link)). Approximately 1 g frozen samples were ground into powder with liquid nitrogen and homogenized with 10 mL methanol. After centrifugation at 11,417 g at 4°C for 15 min, the supernatants were collected and dried using nitrogen gas. The extracts were then dissolved in 5% methanol and purified using a C18 solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The cartridge was next washed with 10 mL 5% methanol, and melatonin was eluted finally at a natural flow rate with 2 mL 80% methanol. The extract was subsequently filtered through a 0.22 μm PTFE syringe filter before UHPLC-ESI-MS/ MS analysis. Melatonin determination and quantification was analyzed using a UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS (UHPLC-1290 Series and a 6460 QqQ-MS/MS; Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) with an Agilent SB-C18 column (4.6 9 50 mm; 1.8 l m; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Melatonin Quantification in Tomato Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melatonin was quantified following a previously reported protocol [30 (link)]. Tomato leaves were ground into a fine powder and melatonin was extracted with chloroform at 4 °C in the dark for 12 h. Then the samples were centrifuged at 4000× g for 5 min and the chloroform fraction was purified using a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The extract was evaporated to dryness and dissolved in methanol for analysis using HPLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Endogenous Melatonin Quantification in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the endogenous plant melatonin concentration, a direct sampling extraction procedure was used as described (Arnao and Hernandez-Ruiz, 2009a (link)) with modifications. Fresh leaf or root samples (0.3 g) were cut into small sections and placed into a 15 mL tube containing 6 mL of chloroform, which was shaken overnight at 4°C in the dark. The sections were extracted again using 2 mL of chloroform. The supernatant was transferred to a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) for the purification of melatonin. The extract was then concentrated to dryness under nitrogen. The residue was dissolved in 2 mL of the mobile phase for HPLC analysis as described (Korkmaz et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Supplements and Beverages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis, three hops and three capsules of each food supplement were randomly selected and homogenized. Then, 100 mg of sample was weighed and extracted with 10 mL of methanol by sonication for 30 min at 25 °C using an ultrasonic bath (Branson 5510, Branson Ultrasonic Corp., Danbury, CT, USA). The extracts yielded were diluted (when required) and filtered through a 0.22 µm PTFE membrane filters before HPLC analysis. For beer analyses, samples were first degassed by sonication for 1 h. Then, 10 mL of each sample was loaded on a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters Corporation, Dublin, Ireland) after conditioning with 5 mL methanol and 5 mL water. Next, the SPE cartridge was washed with 5 mL of water and the fraction of interest was eluted with 5 mL of methanol. A portion of the extract was filtered with a 0.22 µm PTFE membrane filter before HPLC injection. Fractions yielded from samples G and MS were evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen at 40 °C, using an evaporator system Labconco Rapid Vertex-Evaporator (Labconco Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA) to concentrate ten times, and fractions yielded from samples M and B were concentrated 2 times under the same procedure. The residues were finally redissolved in methanol and filtered through 0.22 µm PTFE membrane filters for further HPLC analysis. All determinations were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of CHO Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two biological replicates of CHO cells ectopically expressing human EPO protein were cultured in suspension with and without 1,3,4-O-Bu3ManNAc treatment. The cells were pelleted and washed twice with PBS while the protein in the medium was concentrated and buffer exchanged by 10 KD filter. Protein was harvested from each sample with 10 mL 8 M urea in 1 M NH4HCO3 followed by two rounds of sonication with 40-60 cycles per round. Protein was reduced by 10 mM TCEP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), alkylated with 16.5 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma-Adrich), and digested with sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega) at 1:50 enzyme:substrate ratio. Peptides were desalted using a C18 solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (Waters) and dried down by SpeedVac.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Biodegradation of MC-YR by Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total biodegradation reaction volume was 5 mL containing 14.8 mg/L MC-YR and 103.6 mg/L protein in PBS in a 10 mL centrifuge tube. The reaction was at 30°C with the shake rate of 200 r/min. The samples of 0.5 mL for each were taken at 0, 1.5, 3, 5, 10 and 24 hr, respectively, and then 0.05 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid (36%, v/v) was added to each sample to stop the reaction. All samples were centrifuged at 12,000 r/min for 10 min, and then the supernatant was used to measure MC-YR and its products with HPLC.
In order to identify the products of MC-YR, the samples of 0.5 mL were passed through a C18 solid-phase extraction cartridge (Waters, OASISTMHLB, USA, 30 mg/mL). Methanol of 0.5 mL was used to elute the products of MC-YR with the rate of 1 mL/min. The elution was used to measure the mass/charge (m/z) of products with LC-MS/MS (API-3000, Applied Biosystems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Melatonin Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melatonin was extracted using the method described by Pothinuch and Tongchitpakdee [69 (link)]. Embryo samples (0.2 g) were pulverized with liquid nitrogen and homogenized in 5 mL of methanol. The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, after ultrasonication (80 Hz) at 45 °C for 40 min. The extracts were dissolved in 1 mL of 5% methanol and purified using a C18 solid phase extraction cartridge (Waters). The sample solution was eluted through a 0.1 μm syringe filter by 1 mL of 80% methanol, and then assayed by UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS (UHPLC-1290 Series and a 6460 QqQ-MS/MS; Agilent Technologies). The excitation and emission wavelengths were at 285 and 345 nm, respectively. Melatonin content was calculated by comparing the peak area (% fluorescence) of the sample with that of its standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mollusk Bioactive Compound Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shell sh samples were cleaned with fresh water, emoved from their shells, and rinsed again with MiliQ water to remove silt from the esh. Shell sh meat and viscera (200g of each batch) was removed and homogenized. An 5 g aliquot of homogenized sample was transferred to a centrifuge tube, 8 mL of 0.5% formic acid solution added, for vortex-mixed for 5 min, ultrasonically extracted for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 9500 rpm/min for 10 min. The suspension was immersed in 0.5% formic acid solution to 10 mL. Two mL of this mixture were added to 5 mL dichloromethane, vortex-mixed for 3 min, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 9500 rpm. Then, 1 mL suspension was passed through a C-18 solid-phase extraction cartridge (Waters, Millford, Mass., USA) that had been activated by adding 3 mL acetonitrile and 3 mL 0.5% formic acid solution in that order, and then immersed in 1.5 mL 0.5% formic acid solution. The eluate was collected, adjusted to 6 mL acetonitrile solution, and vortexed. The resulting solution was allowed to rest for 30 min in a -4℃ refrigerator, then centrifuged at 9500 t/min for 5 min, passed through 0.22 μm nylon syringe lter and collected in a brown test tube.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!