The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Biodoc it imaging system

Manufactured by Analytik Jena
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The BioDoc-It Imaging System is a versatile lab equipment designed for capturing high-quality images of gels, blots, and other samples. The system features a built-in camera and illumination system, allowing for efficient documentation of experimental results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

46 protocols using biodoc it imaging system

1

Characterization of HuscFvs Targeting HCV NS3/4A

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spectrometrically standardized soluble HuscFvs in the lysates of transformed HB2151 E. coli clones were tested for binding to the rNS3/4A by indirect ELISA and Western blotting. Original HB2151 E. coli (HB) was used as background binding control in both assays. BSA served as control antigen in the indirect ELISA.
Diversity of the huscfvs sequences of the HB2151 E. coli clones were determined by subjecting the PCR amplified huscfvs to MvaI digestion followed by resolving the cut DNA products in 14% polyacrylamide gel containing 0.5% glycerol. Electrophoresis was carried out in TBE buffer at 20 mA per slab gel. The separated DNA bands were stained by ethidium bromide and the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was determined using a Bio Doc-ITTM Imaging System, UVP, USA. CDRs and their respective canonical immunoglobulin framework regions (FRs) of the sequenced huscfvs were predicted using an online Internatioanl ImMunoGeneTics (IMGT®) Information System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ISSR Primer Screening for Genetic Diversity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultivars "Olympic Fire", "Ostbo Red" (maternal parent of "Olympic Fire"), and "Starburst" were used to screen 96 ISSR primers designed by the University of British Columbia (UBC 801-896). Eight primers were selected based on the strong, clear, reproducible, and polymorphic banding patterns they produced. ISSR-PCR amplifications were performed in a total volume of 20 µL consisting of 2 µL (20 ng) template DNA, 2 µL primer, 10 µL master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA), and 6 µL double-distilled water. The amplifications were programmed in a Mastercycler nexus gradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) under following conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94 • C for 5 min; 40 cycles of 94 • C for 30 s, 52 • C for 50 s, and 72 • C for 120 s; followed by an extension for 7 min at 72 • C. Samples were then cooled to 4 • C and placed in a refrigerator until being loaded into gels. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels that, in 0.5 × TBE buffer solution (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) (80 V for 3.5 h) and stained with 0.5 mg•L -1 ethidium bromide solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). 100-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), were loaded onto the outside two lanes of each gel to estimate the size of amplified fragments. Gels were visualized and photographed using a BioDoc-It TM Imaging System (UVP, Upland, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Anaerobic and Aerobic Bacterial Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After serial dilution in a maximum-recovery diluent, the bacteria were cultured on MRS agar and LB agar plates in an anaerobic chamber and a regular incubator at 37°C. The growth was monitored after 24~48 h and photographs were taken with the BioDoc-It TM Imaging System (UVP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Vitro Assay of RET1 Enzyme Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual reactions were made up in 0.2 ml PCR tubes (Peqlab 820264-A). RET1 enzyme (see SI text) was added (0.05 μl, 0.2 mg ml−1), UTP (Thermo Scientific R0471 100 mM) was added to a final concentration of 50 μM. RNA substrate (see SI text) was added to a final concentration of 200 nM. Inhibitors were added as required (0.5 μl in DMSO) to a final concentration of 50 μM. When no inhibitor was included 5 % (vol/vol) DMSO was added as control. The volume was made up to 10 μl in buffer D (Tris pH 7.5 10 mM, KCl 200 mM, DTT 1 mM, EDTA 0.5 mM MgCl2 3.2 mM) and the reaction was incubated for 20 mins at 27°C, then inactivated at 65°C for 10 mins. RNA loading dye (10 μl, NEB B363A) was added and tubes were heated (5 mins at 70°C), 10 μl was loaded onto 15 % TBE urea pre-cast gel (Invitrogen EC68852) and run in 1 x TBE buffer for 1.5 h at 130 V. Gels were incubated with Sybr Gold nucleic acid stain (Life Technologies S11494) for 20 mins, then imaged on an ultraviolet trans-illuminator (BioDoc-It imaging system, UVP). Experiments were carried out in duplicate for each inhibitor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Glycoconjugate Labeling and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 8

Cells were seeded at 3×106/8 ml per 10-cm dish and treated with control and test sugars (200 micromolar Fuc 3 vs. alkynyl derivatized Fuc 1, or 25 micromolar ManNAc 5 vs. alkynyl derivatized ManNAc 2) in growth medium at 37° C. After 3 days, cell extracts were prepared by resuspending the cells in 1 ml of lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40/150 mM NaCl/protease inhibitor/100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5). Protein extract (1 mg/ml) was labeled for 1 h at room temperature (conditions as outlined in microscopic analysis; the azido rhodamine probe was a gift from Benjamin F. Cravatt, The Scripps Research Institute). Labeled protein lysate was resolved by SDS/PAGE. For immunoblotting of biotin-labeled glycoconjugates, electrophoresed proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes, blocked for 20 min with SuperBlock Blocking Buffer, probed for 1 h with anti-biotin MAb (1 microgram/ml), and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:7, 500 dilution) for 30 min. Each step was followed by a wash with 0.02% Tween 20/PBS (PBST). Signal was developed with SuperSignal Chemiluminescent Substrate and detected by exposure to x-ray film. For detecting the coumarin-labeled glycoconjugates, gels were examined under 365 nm UV light with a 535+/−50 nm filter. Images were taken by using a BioDoc—It imaging system (UVP). Rhodamine gels were analyzed.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Plasmid Transformation Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three transformations were carried out as shown in Fig. 2A: the intact target plasmid into cells without the chromosomal gene for CisA, the target plasmid without initiation and termination sequences into cells with the chromosomal gene for CisA, and the intact target plasmid into cells with the chromosomal gene for CisA. Transformant colonies were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with chloramphenicol (15 ng/μl) and inoculated to liquid LB cultures with chloramphenicol. After overnight growth in 37°C shaken at 225 rounds per minute (the same growth conditions from here on unless specified otherwise), 1 ml of culture was purified and eluted to 40 μl of elution buffer, and 5 μl was used for electrophoresis (0.8% agarose gel, 110 V, 40 min; Bio-Rad Mini-Sub Cell GT Systems). An image was taken using UVP BioDoc-It Imaging System and analyzed using ImageJ to calculate fraction of the nicked target plasmid with the following equation: brightness of the band for nicked DNA (brightness of the band for nicked DNA + brightness of the band for supercoiled DNA + brightness of the band for linear DNA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluate Bacterial Motility and Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured S. Typhimurium was suspended in Tris-Maleate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.4) at 1e7 CFU/ml. The semi-solid agar plates were composed of Tris-Maleate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.4), 0.2% w/v casamino acids (BD bacto-tryptone 211705), and 0.3% w/v agar (BD bacto-agar 244520), and prepared the day prior to the experiment. To the center each plate, an aliquot (20μl) was added of either HD6, mouse IgG1 antibody, or Tris-Maleate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.4, as vehicle control). Next, the center of each plate was inoculated with an aliquot (3 μl) of the S. Typhimurium suspension. Plates were then incubated at 37°C for 6.5 hours. After incubation, the plates were photographed using a gel imager (UVP, Upland, CA, BioDoc-It Imaging system). The bacterial motility/swimming parameters were assessed for each plate using ImageJ. Thus, for each image, a circular mask of swimming bacteria was generated using the “Threshold” and “Find Edges” tools. From this mask, the diameter of the circle of swimming bacteria was then measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RAPD Analysis of In Vitro Regenerated Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twelve in vitro regenerated plants were PCR analysed using RAPD primers to check the extent of genetic similarity. Genomic DNA was isolated from leaves using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [20 (link)]. The DNA concentration was estimated using Multiskan GO (Thermo Scientific). DNA samples were diluted, and the concentration was adjusted up to 50 ng µl−1. A 25 µl reaction mix was prepared for each DNA sample using 10 × PCR buffer, MgCl2 (25 mM), dNTPs (10 mM), primers (10 mM), Taq polymerase (BR Biochem) (0.25 unit/rxn.), autoclaved ddH2O and DNA (1 µl of 50 ng µl−1) as a template. PCR tubes were arranged in My Cycler (Bio-Rad). Reaction conditions were set as denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min (for the 1st cycle), [94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 37 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 3 min] for 30 cycles, final extension at 72 °C for 10 min and hold at 4 °C for infinite. Gel electrophoresis was performed for the PCR products, and gel pictures were captured using a BioDoc-It™ Imaging System (UVP). Total bands were scored by counting manually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sperm Genomic DNA Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA /RNA Shield (#R110 0; Zy mo) and Quick gDNA Genomic Lysis Buffer (included in kit), were used for sperm lysis instead of Buffer RLT. Samples in the Genomic Lysis Buf fer were loaded onto the columns, while samples in DNA /RNA Shield were combined with 3 volumes of Genomic Lysis Buffer before being loaded onto spin columns. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min to bind. Wash and elution steps followed the manufacturer’s protocol for a final elution volume of 100 µL.
DNA yields and quality were determined using the Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (#E112352; Thermo Scientific, Somerset, NJ). A total of 350 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) was resolved on a 0.7% agarose gel at 100 V for 45 min, stained with 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide solution, and visualized on a BioDoc-It Imaging System (#97-0172-01; UVP, Upland, CA). Given that haploid cells are expected to contain 3 pg DNA per cell, DNA yields were calculated as the observed yield/expected yield based on cell count. The full protocol for DNA isolation is provided in the Supplementary Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

EMSA for MSMEG_0307 DNA Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA fragments (∼300bp) containing the binding sequence motifs were amplified using PCR and primers (Table S1) and further purified. The reactions had a final volume of 10 μl and contained 100 ng of DNA, 1× EMSA buffer (20 mM Tris.HCl pH8, 75 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2) and increasing concentrations of recombinant His-tagged MSMEG_0307 protein (0.01 μg to 1 μg). The reactions were incubated at room temperature for 30 min and then were loaded onto a 5% (v/v) native polyacrylamide gel. Following electrophoresis the gels were stained with ethidium bromide and the bands were visualised using BioDoc-It™ imaging system (UVP, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!