The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Geforce rtx 2080 gpu

Manufactured by NVIDIA
Sourced in United States

The GeForce RTX 2080 is a high-performance graphics processing unit (GPU) developed by NVIDIA. It is designed to enable advanced graphics processing capabilities for various applications, including gaming, video editing, and scientific computing. The RTX 2080 features a powerful NVIDIA Turing architecture, which provides improved performance and energy efficiency compared to previous-generation GPUs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

11 protocols using geforce rtx 2080 gpu

1

CNN Model for MRI Image Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CNN model is implemented in Python using Keras [30 ] with TensorFlow library [31 ]. All the experiments were performed on the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 GPU. The deep network is trained end to end using patches. During the training phase of the CNN model, the patches are extracted from each slice in MR images. The training set is divided into two subsets, one for training the network and the other for validating the results. The optimization technique employed to update the parameters in the model is the Adam method [32 ]. In neural network parameter optimization, the Adam method shows better convergence. The hyperparameters used during network training include the fixed learning rate of 0.0001 for 50 epochs. These parameters' setting has produced sufficient convergence to optimal network parameters without overfitting the data. The size of the minibatch is set to 64, and each minibatch includes random number of patches. The best model from the validation set is selected at the 24th epoch which takes 48 hours on the GPUs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Neural Network for Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used Conda (version 4.8.3) environment with Python 3.6.10, Keras API (version 2.3.1), and TensorFlow (version 2.2.0) backend to implement the neural network architecture. The training was conducted using an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX CPU, x86_64 architecture, 128 GB RAM, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 GPU. Statistical analyses related to intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were conducted in Python 3.6.10 with scikit-learn 0.24.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CNN-based Ruptured Aneurysm Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A CNN with an Alexnet_v2 architecture was used. For the third through the fifth convolution layers, 3 × 3 sized filters were used. For the second layer and the first layer, 5 × 5 and 11 × 11 sized filters were used, respectively. The system received three channel 224 × 224 sized input images extracted with a diameter of 65 pixels, consisting of three max pooling layers, two drop-out layers, three fully connected layers, and five convolution layers as seen in Figure 2. The model was implemented on a TensorFlow API (Google Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA). Data sets were completely balanced (on categories) and resized to 224 × 224 as train data sets. In addition, data augmentation was performed. We flipped each piece of data horizontally and vertically. Accordingly, we were able to get four times more trained images in total compared to the original trained images. All parameters were trained from scratch using the Adam optimization method with a batch size of 20 on the Geforce RTX 2080 GPU (NVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The learning rate was set to be 5 × 10−7 and the drop-out rate was 0.5. The Adam optimizer was set with the default parameters. Ruptured aneurysms were defined as those with an expected rupture risk of ≥50% among the aneurysm images after discussion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nested Stratified Cross-Validation for Model Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To avoid data-leakage when reporting the performance of the different models, nested stratified cross-validation was used. Nested cross-validation guarantees that different data is used to tune model parameters and to evaluate its performance by means of outer and inner cross-validation loops [47 ]. In the outer loop, train/test splits are generated, which are then used for averaging the test scores over several data splits. In the inner loop, the train set is further split in train/validation subsets. The best parameters are selected by minimizing the MEDAE on the validation splits. We used 5-folds and 7-folds stratified cross-validations in the outer and inner loops, respectively. To ensure that the distribution of RTs is representative of the population in all folds, stratification was performed by separating the target variable (RTs) into 6 different bins. The validation procedure is also summarized in Fig. S1 of Additional file 1.
The Bayesian hyperparameter search ("Bayesian hyperparameter search" Section) and the validation procedure described in this section approximately required 2.5 months of computational time in a computer with an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX with 24 cores at 1.85 Gz, and a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 GPU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Performance Computational Platform

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the computations reported in this study were performed on a Lenovo P620 workstation with AMD 3970X 32-Core processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 GPU, and 512GB of RAM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fetal Brain MRI Segmentation using U-Net

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We designed a convolutional neural network based on the well established U-Net architecture76 for biomedical semantic image segmentation, as it recently proved its ability to perform well for 2D fetal brain MRI tissue segmentation22 (link). The baseline 2D U-Net is trained using a hybrid loss function defined as the sum of a categorical cross-entropy and a Dice loss. The latter is intended to mitigate any imbalance in the samples of the different classes22 (link),77 .
The implementation is performed in the framework of TensorFlow 2.578 and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 GPU is deployed for training.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-performance Image Stitching and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The image stitching pipeline was deployed on a high-performance cluster described in (Winnubst et al., 2019 (link)). The rest of the image processing and analysis pipeline was implemented in MATLAB (2019b) and deployed on a desktop workstation with dual Intel Xeon E5–2687W CPUs (2 sockets, 24 cores), 512 GB RAM, a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti GPU and a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 GPU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Prostate Cancer Image Registration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We trained the neural networks on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 GPU (8GB memory, 14000 MHz clock speed). We used an initial learning rate of 0.001, a learning rate decay of 0.95, a batch size of 64, and the Adam optimizer Kingma and Ba (2017) , for which both the affine and deformable registration networks were trained with 50 epochs. For each deformation model, the network with the minimum validation loss during the training was used in the testing.
In total, we experimented with three different approaches for registration of MRI and the corresponding histopathology images: the traditional RAPSODI registration framework Rusu et al. (2020) (RAPSODI), a prior deep learning registration framework developed by Rocco et al. Rocco et al. (2017) (CNNGeometric), and our deep learning ProsRegNet pipeline (ProsRegNet), We tested the RAPSODI approach on the Intel Core i9-9900K CPU (8-Core, 16-Thread, 3.6 GHz (5.0 GHz Turbo)) and tested the CNNGeometric and ProsRegNet approaches on the GeForce RTX 2080 GPU. In total, we used datasets of 53 prostate cancer patients (12 from Cohort 1, 16 from Cohort 2, and 25 from Cohort 3) to evaluate the performance of the above three registration approaches.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Performance Server Configuration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The server platform was configured as an Intel Core CPU I7-9700 K with a 3.60 GHz processor, 16 GB DDR4 2400Mhz memory, 2 TB hard drive capacity, 8 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 GPU and the operating system was Windows 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Unsupervised Learning for MRI Biomarker Discovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We have trained our network solely on b0 images (15 per subject), using an 8-fold nested cross validation where we trained and validated on 27 subjects and tested on four. The proportion of the validation data was set to 15% of the training set. The training/validation set contains 25,920 slices of a 128 x 128 field of view, totaling 424,673,280 voxels. Our network was trained in an unsupervised manner by feeding normalized 2D axial slices that are encoded as feature maps in the latent space. The number of feature maps, and hence the dimensionality of the latent space, was optimized (optimal value to 32) using Keras-Tuner (52 ). The batch size and the learning rate were additionally optimized and set to 32 and 5e-5, respectively. The network that was initialized using (53 ) was trained for 200 epochs to minimize the mean squared error loss between the predicted and the ground truth image. We have utilized for this aim the Adam optimizer (54 (link)) with the default parameters β1 = 0.5, β2 = 0.999, and the network corresponding to the epoch with the minimal validation loss was then selected. The implementation was performed in the framework of TensorFlow 2.4.1 (55 ) and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 GPU was deployed for training. Network code and checkpoint examples can be found in our Github repository1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!