The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eos 7d mark 2

Manufactured by Canon
Sourced in Japan

The EOS 7D Mark II is a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera designed and manufactured by Canon. It features a 20.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, Dual DIGIC 6 image processors, and a 65-point all cross-type autofocus system. The camera is capable of continuous shooting at up to 10 frames per second and offers Full HD video recording capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using eos 7d mark 2

1

Imaging of Rhyzopertha dominica Life Stages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rhyzopertha dominica insects were point-mounted on insect pins (#1, Bioquip, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA), pulled from the colony as adults, or as pupae or larvae developing within a single grain kernel. Developing life stages were excised from the kernel, and along with unmounted specimens were placed on a series of two back-to-back petri dishes (35 mm × 15 mm), which comprised a platform on which to photograph the life stages. Pictures of the life stages were taken using a DSLR camera (EOS 7D Mark II, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted to 3D imaging StackShot (CogniSys, Inc., Traverse City, MI, USA) equipped with a dual flash (MT-26EX-RT, Canon, Tokyo, Japan). A macro lens (MP-E 65 mm f/2.8, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to focus on the life stages at 1–5-fold a 1:1 life size ratio. Light was diffused using a partially cut occluded plastic jar (15.2 cm × 7.6 cm D:H). A stack of between 25–45 slices was taken, depending on the size of the specimen, then combined using image montage software (Helicon Focus, Helicon Soft Ltd., Kharkiv, Ukraine) to create a single image in-focus throughout the range of the specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Luminescent Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase structure was investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, BRUKER AXS GMBH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Observations of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) were carried out on a JEOL JEM-2100F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) microscope. The diffuse reflectance spectra were measured using a ultraviolet/visible/near infrared spectrophotometer (V570, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). Afterglow (AG) curves were characterized by a fluorescence spectrometer (F-4600, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Thermoluminescence (ThL) was measured using a ThL meter (FJ427A1, Beijing Nuclear Instrument Factory, Beijing, China) at a heating rate of 1 °C/s. Compression and friction were produced by a universal testing machine and a lab-made friction machine, respectively. ML signals were captured using an in-house assembled photon-counting system. Spectra of ML and AG were recorded by an optic spectrometer (QE65000, Ocean Optics, Florida, United States). Before the measurement of ML and AG, the samples were irradiated by a handheld UV lamp (254 nm, 6 W) for 1 min. Photographs of ML and AG were recorded using a camera (EOS 7D Mark II, Canon, Tokyo, Japan). All measurements except AG were performed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed Oyster Specimen Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the laboratory, the samples were dried at 48°C for 72 hours. All specimen from all samples were cleaned with a brush and weighed on a laboratory scale (in grams with an accuracy of two decimals). Samples were photographed under artificial light (Canon EOS 7D Mark II with Canon EF-S 18–55mm f/3.5–5.6 lens) from both sides (interior, exterior) and were measured (length, width) using ImageJ 1.52q [46 (link)]. The projected 2D oyster area was determined by highlighting the shell, using the “color threshold” tool (hue: 0–28, saturation: 0–243, brightness: 0–230, thresholding method: default, threshold color: red, color space: HSB), and a subsequent measurement of the oyster area by the “wand tracing” tool. To assess the number and area of boring sponge holes for each individual oyster, the original image was modified in color (converted to 8-bit, colorized with “spectrum”, converted to RGB) and the identified holes were highlighted by color thresholding (see S2 Fig in S1 File).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Morphological Characterization of Fungal Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the macromorphological features, images were taken using a Canon EOS 7D Mark II camera fitted with a 35 mm lens. To investigate their micromorphological features, fungal tissues were mounted on microscope slides with a drop of either lactic acid, in the case of Torrubiellomyces, or lacto-fuchsin stain (0.1 g acid fuchsin powder and 100 mL 85 % lactic acid) for Niveomyces to aid visualisation of taxonomically informative structures. The slides were visualized using a Leica DMi8 inverted microscope, mounted with a Leica MC 170 HD camera (Leica Microsystems). Type materials (holotypes and paratypes) are deposited at the New York Botanical Garden Herbarium (type numbers NY4434800 and NY4434801 for N. coronatus and T. zombiae, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Acquiring High-Quality H&E Slide Images

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photographs of the H&E stained slides were taken with a Canon EOS 7D Mark II (mfr#9128B002AA) and Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8 L Macro (mfr#3554B002) lens. Slides were placed on a lightbox and photographed at 1:1 magnification with a shutter speed of 1/100 sec, aperture of f8.0, ISO 400 and saved as Canon RAW files. Contrast was adjusted equally for all images with Photoshop Lightroom and then exported as PNG files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genitalia Preparation and Imaging Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genitalia preparations were made following standard techniques (Robinson 1976 ). Genitalia were separated from the abdomen, and mostly mounted in ventral aspect, some also in lateral aspect to show structural details not clearly visible in ventral aspect. The abdomen was cut laterally and spread out.
Photographs of adult specimens were taken with a Canon EOS 7D Mark II, MP-E 65 mm EF 100 mm macro lens. Focus stacking was done with Cognisys StackShot and Zerene Stacker, and final image editing with Adobe Photoshop 2021. Images of Meyrick’s adult type specimens in the NHMUK were provided under the museum’s Digital Collection Programme. The genitalia in the research collection of Kari and Timo Nupponen (coll. NUPP) were photographed with a Leica DM1000 microscope and integrated Leica DF295 digital camera. The genitalia in coll. NHMUK were photographed in Sackler Imaging Suite using a Zeiss Axioskop. Most genitalia dissections in both coll. NHMUK and coll. NUPP were photographed in 2–6 images in different focal planes and combined into single images using image-stacking software as implemented in Photoshop 2021. Images were edited in Photoshop 2021 and plates were compiled in CorelDraw 2018. Genitalia figures are not in scale.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multi-modal Imaging of Microfossils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conventional (light) photographs were taken with either a Canon EOS 7D Mark II camera mounted on a BK Lab Plus Lab imaging system (Dun Inc., Charlottesville, VA, USA), a Leica DVM6 microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), or a Nikon D100 digital camera using a standard copy stand. SEM images were taken with a FEI Quanta 650F variable-pressure field-emission SEM (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR). The FEI microscope was operated at 15 kV, with a spot size of 2.45 and working distances of about 12 to 15 mm. Notably, the high conductivity of the rocks from McGraths Flat allowed high-resolution SEM imaging without any coating. All microfossils were imaged in situ (i.e., in the matrix) rather than using acid preparation. Micro x-ray fluorescence (μXRF) was undertaken by directly sampling across the surface of a rock containing a fish spine (AM F.146602) using a benchtop M4 Tornado μXRF (Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA). This allowed us to sample both the fossil and matrix for differences in chemistry. The instrument consists of a Rh anode metal-ceramic x-ray tube. The measurement was carried out under vacuum condition (20 mbar). The following parameters were used for elemental mapping analysis: x-ray tube, 45 kV and 600 μA; area mapping point distance, 60 μm; time/pixel, 600 ms; 1 cycle; maximum energy, 40 keV; and maximum pulse throughput, 130 kilo counts per second.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Yeast Salt Tolerance Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of salt tolerance in yeast was carried out using a yeast expression vector. PCR primers were designed based on the CDS sequence of the PtrDHN-3 gene as follows: forward primer 5’-ACTCACTATAGGGAATATTA ATGGCTGAGGAAAACAAGAGC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-TAATTACATGATGCGGCCCTCTACTGGGAAGCACTCTCCT-3’. The PtrDHN-3 gene was transferred into the yeast expression vector pYES2 (Carlsbad, CA, USA) using the Infusion enzyme (Zhongmei Taihe, c5891-50, Taihe, China). The constructed expression vector pYES2-PtrDHN-3 was then transformed into INVSC1 yeast cells, with an empty pYES2 plasmid used as a control. The transformed cells were cultivated on an SC-U medium containing 2% glucose in an incubator at 30 °C for three days. Positive clones were then identified by PCR detection. Single-clone cells containing the recombinant DNA (pYES2-PtrDHN-3) and control vector cells were then incubated in an SC-U medium with shaking until an OD of 0.6 was reached. Yeast cells were then diluted 10-, 100- and 1000-fold and spotted on an SC-U medium. For the salt tolerance assay, yeast cells were re-suspended in 3 M NaCl for 24 h then spread on an an SC-U medium and inverted in an incubator at 30 °C for three days. Images were then obtained (Canon EOS 7D MARKII, Japan). As a control, the cultured yeast cells were spotted on an SC-U medium without NaCl treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Photographing Dried Specimen Heads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two dried heads were affixed to a minuten pin with superglue, then moved into appropriate position with a Patafix roller on a glass slide.
Images were taken with a Canon EOS 7 D Mark II with a Canon MP-E65 macro lens with a bellows device. Two flashes were used to provide soft light through a transparent plastic cylinder. Image stacks were montaged using Zerene Stacker (Zerene Systems LLC, Richland, WA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!