The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ph paper

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States

PH paper is a type of litmus paper used to measure the pH level of a solution. It is a simple and inexpensive tool for quickly determining the acidity or basicity of a liquid. PH paper changes color depending on the pH of the solution it is dipped in, providing a visual indication of the pH value.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using ph paper

1

Preparation of [99mTc(H2O)3(CO)3]+ Labeling Precursor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Isolink kit (Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland) to prepare the labeling precursor ([99mTc(H2O)3 (CO)3]+) contained the following lyophilized ingredients: 8.5 mg sodium tartrate, 2.85 mg sodium tetraborate decahydrate, 7.15 mg of sodium carbonate and 4.5 mg sodium bicarbonate. Freshly eluted 99mTcO4 from a commercial General Electric Healthcare, UK generator (~2 GBq) in 1 mL saline buffer was added to the kit vial and incubated at 100°C for 20 min. The vial was then allowed to cool to RT and the solution neutralized by adding stepwise 1M HCl to pH ~7 and then checked on pH paper (Merck Millipore, Milan, Italy). The radiochemical purity (RCP) of the product was analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and RPC was greater than 95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Radioiodine Labeling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For patient release, different release criteria are set regarding the final activity, RCY and RCP. Intermediate activity measurements during- and after labelling are performed using the dose calibrator with validated geometries. To determine the RCY, radio-(I)TLC is used. An ITLC-SG strip [0.5 × 10 cm, dried 20 min at 160 °C from Agilent Technologies (Folsom, CA, United States) is spotted with 3 µL labelling solution, at 1 cm from the bottom of the strip and is dried for 30 s before placement in 250 µL 1 M Sodium-Citrate solution (pH 5). After separation, the strip is dried for 10 min, thereafter sealed in parafilm. For measurements, standardized settings for the drop point, endpoint, scanning time and regions of interest (ROI) for the ITLC-SG strip are used. The ITLC strip is cut at a retention factor (RF) of 0.7, each part is measured in the gamma counter. The pH is determined using pH paper from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). An HPLC is prepared with and activity of 6 MBq/100 µL and was injected at time points t = 0 (directly after labelling), 4, 24 and 48 h, analysis is performed according to the earlier described settings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Radiochemical Characterization of PET Tracers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The appearance test was performed visually by checking the product vial for particles or turbulence in the final volume. The pH of the product was determined using Merck pH paper (pH 4–9). The radiochemical purity, radiochemical identity, and radiochemical stability of [11C]flumazenil and [11C]L-deprenyl were analyzed by Agilent analytical high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). This HPLC is equipped with a quaternary pump G1311A, manual injector, ultraviolet (UV) detector G1314D, and radio detector. An analytical HPLC column from Xbridge (C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm particle size) was used, and an isocratic mobile phase of 25% of acetonitrile and 75% of 10 mM phosphoric acid was used for [11C]flumazenil. A mobile phase of 50% acetonitrile and 50% ammonium phosphate buffer pH–9 was used for [11C]L-deprenyl. The flow rate was 2 mL/min. The identification of products was determined by co-injecting with the corresponding reference standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Melamine Detection in Milk via SERS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The milk samples with 0.5 % fat content (Dansk Maelk, Jacobs Douwe Egberts Professional, København, Denmark) were purchased from a local commercial supplier. The samples, spiked with melamine, were pretreated prior to SERS measurement, using a gel filtration column (NAP-25, GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) as also described by A. Kim et al. 61 (link) In short, 2.5 ml milk samples, spiked with various melamine concentrations (0.3 ppm -2.5 ppm) using the pH 7.4 stock solutions, were loaded into the saturated filtration column. The milk was allowed to sink into the column and subsequently eluted in 2.5 ml fractions with PBS pH 7.4. For SERS measurements the pH of the fractions were adjusted with 10 % HCl to a pH value between 3 to 4, which was verified with pH paper (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Zinc Acetate Concentration and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A stock solution of 160 mM Zn(CH3CO2)2 was prepared, then diluted to a final concentration of 3.2 mM. A stock solution of ammonium hydroxide at 1 M was also prepared. Sample was run through a C18 column at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Before electrospray, a neutralizing solution of 1 M ammonium hydroxide was added at a flow rate of 5 μl/min, then the solution of 3.2 mM zinc acetate was added at a flow rate of 5 μl/min. Post-LC pH was verified by collecting the flow through and spotting on pH paper (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

NMR Characterization of 2OX Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H NMR spectra were recorded on either a Varian Mercury 400 MHz or Bruker DRX 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Massachusetts, USA). Diffusion Ordered Spectroscopy (DOSY) experiments were performed using a longitudinal encode-decode (LED) pulse sequence with a 5–95% varying gradient strength over 19 points.
2OX was dissolved in buffers adjusted to a known pH (+/− 0.2 pH units) as measured using either pH paper (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) or a pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Ohio, USA). Buffers used were 0.5 M pH 5 sodium acetate, pH 7 sodium phosphate or pH 9 sodium carbonate. Buffers were prepared at the appropriate pH in water, then exchanged 3 × in 99.8% D2O under vacuum. Reactions were held at constant temperature in a thermostatted oven for periods of up to 6 months.
NMR measurements of 2OX were recorded starting from concentrations of 2, 20 or 200 mM using ~ 0.5 mL volumes in Wilmad NMR tubes (Wilmad Lab Glass, New Jersey, USA) capped under air. Samples were measured periodically, and the kinetics measured by comparison of proton integrations. Results reported in Figure SI4 were conducted at 25° C or 40° C as noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RT-LAMP Assay for Rapid Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-LAMP assays were assembled in a total reaction volume of 20 μl, each 10 μl iLACO reactions contained: 2 μl of home-made 10X buffer (100 mM (NH4)2SO4, 500 mM KCl, 80 mM MgSO4, and 1% v/v Tween-20), 2.8 μl of dNTP mix (10mM each, TianGen), l μl of Bst 2.0 WarmStart DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) or Bst V7.16, 0.5 μl of RTx reverse transcriptase (New England Biolabs) or home-made RT, 1 μl of a combination of dyes (both 0.5 μl of phenol red and azure II, 2mM of each dye), and above components were mixed in DEPC H2O up to 10 μl, then adjusted pH to 7.5 with 1M KOH and measured by pH paper (Supelco). In addition to the above, 2 μl of 10X LAMP primer mix (2 μM F3, 2 μM B3, 16 μM FIP, 16 μM BIP, 4 μM LF and 4 μM LB), 1 μl sample and DEPC H2O up to 20 μl were required.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of iLACO-dual for SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1 Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We first tested the performance of iLACO-dual with in vitro transcribed virus RNA fragments for SARS-CoV-2 and 2009 H1N1 influenza virus [7 , 30 ]. When the RT-LAMP assays were performed with Bst 2.0 WarmStart DNA polymerase, each reaction condition (20 μL) consisted of 2 μL Isothermal Amplification Buffer (New England Biolabs), 2.8 μL dNTP Mix (10 mM), 0.5 μL WarmStart RTx Reverse Transcriptase (New England Biolabs), 1 μL Bst 2.0 WarmStart DNA polymerase, 2 μL RT-LAMP primer mix (0.8 μM FIP, 0.8 μM Q-FIP: Fd, 1.6 μM BIP, 0.2 μM F3/B3, 0.4 μM LF/LB), 1 μL RNA mix of SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1, 10.7 μL DEPC water. Bst 3.0 DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, USA) was the same as Bst 2.0 WarmStart DNA polymerase, except the KCl is 150 mM in Isothermal Amplification Buffer instead of 50 mM for Bst 2.0.
For homemade Bst variant Bst v7.16, the Isothermal Amplification Buffer contains 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 50 mM KCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Tween 20, and all components were mixed in DEPC water, then adjusted pH to 7.5 with 1M KOH and measured by pH paper (Supelco). The other reagents of the reaction condition (20 μL) were the same as Bst 2.0 and Bst 3.0 DNA polymerase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!