The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using mupirocin

1

Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. aureus isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonic GmBH, Bremen, Germany), and MRSA isolates were detected by antibiotic susceptibility testing using the agar disk diffusion method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [18 ]. The antibiotics tested were penicillin, cefoxitin, gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampin, linezolid, and mupirocin (BD, Sparks, USA). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin and teicoplanin was determined using the E-test (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of SAR Bari Strain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the SAR Bari strain was determined by a BD PHOENIX 100 instrument (Becton Dickinson, Franklyn Lake, NJ). Data were elaborated by the BD Epicenter Expert System according to EUCAST rules (http://www.eucast.org). The PMIC/ID-88 (BD) panel was used to test susceptibility to ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftaroline, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, daptomycin, erythro-mycin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, imipenem, linezolid, moxifloxacin, mupirocin, nitro-furantoin, oxacillin, penicillin, rifampin, teicoplanin, tetracyclin, tigecycline, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. The Epsilometer Test (ETest) was used for testing resistance to ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, moxifloxacin, tetracyclin, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin (bioMérieux, Marcy-L’Étolie, France and Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). All tests were repeated on four independent technical replicates. MIC interpretative breakpoints were defined according to EUCAST recommendations. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of CA-MRSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All S. aureus isolates were identified by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, Biotyper, Bruker Daltonic GmBH, Bremen, Germany). The susceptibility of CA-MRSA isolates was tested against 16 antimicrobial agents using the disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (13 ). The antibiotics tested were penicillin, cefoxitin, vancomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, kanamycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, rifampin, linezolid, mupirocin and fusidic acid (BD, Maryland, USA). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of oxacillin was performed using the E-test (bioMerieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of MRSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility patterns of the MRSA isolates were performed by the agar disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (15 , 16 ). The antibiotics tested were penicillin, cefoxitin, gentamicin, tobramycin, kanamycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, rifampin, linezolid, mupirocin and fusidic acid (BD, Sparks, USA). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of oxacillin, cefoxitin and vancomycin was performed using the E-test (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Staphylococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility assay was performed on all staphylococci according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [44 ]. Sixteen antimicrobial agents were utilized for disc diffusion assays on Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA, Difco Laboratories): ampicillin (AMP, 10 μg), cefoxitin (FOX, 30 μg), penicillin (PEN, 10 μg), chloramphenicol (CHL, 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg), enrofloxacin (ENR, 5 μg), levofloxacin (LEV, 5 μg), clindamycin (CLI, 2 μg), erythromycin (ERY, 15 μg), gentamicin (GEN, 10 μg), mupirocin (MUP, 200 μg), rifampicin (RIF, 5 μg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT, 23.75/1.25 μg), quinupristin-dalfopristin (SYN, 15 μg), and tetracycline (TET, 30 μg). mupirocin was purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK), and the rest of the antimicrobial agents were purchased from BD BBLTM (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of oxacillin (OXA), TET, CIP, and ENR were determined for all the study strains by using the standard two-fold broth microdilution [44 ]. The MICs of the study strains to vancomycin (VAN) and linezolid (LZD) were determined by standard Etest (AB Biodisk, Dalvagen, Sweden). S. aureus MW2 and S. aureus ATCC 29213 strains were used as reference strains for the antimicrobial susceptibility tests. All antimicrobial susceptibility tests were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Disc Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The disc diffusion method was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (bioMerieux) with following antibiotic paper discs - disc content (μg): cefoxitin (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), mupirocin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) (1.25/23.75 μg), (Becton Dickinson, USA). Tests were performed and interpreted according to the guidelines of the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [16 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!