The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using anti cd45 30 f11

1

Quantifying Tumor Immune Infiltrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors obtained at necropsy were digested in media containing 1 mg/mL collagenase and 20 μg/mL DNAse I (Sigma) for 2 hours at 37°C, and passed through a 100 μm screen to obtain a single-cell suspension. CD8+ T cells were isolated (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC Canada) and then stained with anti-CD3 (17A2, eBioscience), anti-CD8 (53-6.7, eBioscience) and anti-CD69 (H1.2F3, eBioscience) antibodies and DAPI. For PD-L1 quantification, tumor suspensions were stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD Bioscience), anti-CD11b (M1/70, eBioscience), anti-GR1 (1A8, BD Bioscience), anti-F4/80 (BM8.1, Tonbo Biosciences), anti-PD-L1 (MIH5, eBioscience) and DAPI.
For PD-1 quantification on antigen-specific T cells, splenocytes obtained from immunized animals were enriched for CD8+ T cells and stained as above, along with tetramers specific for the SSX2 p41 or p103 epitopes (NIH Tetramer Core Facility, Atlanta GA), anti-PD-1 (J43, BD Bioscience, San Jose CA) and Ghost Dye–780 (Tonbo Bioscience, San Diego, CA).
For in vitro culture studies, cells were treated for 18 hours with 1 μg/mL recombinant mIFNγ (Shenandoah Biotechnology, Warwick PA), or cultured for 48 hours with CD8+ splenocytes isolated from immunized animals, and then collected using non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma), and stained as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tumor Immune Cell Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were excised, weighed, and mechanically minced. Minced tumors were placed in gentle MACS Dissociator with Tumor Dissociation Kit for mouse tissues (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA, United States) to isolate immune and tumor cell subsets in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions. The cell suspension was passed through a 40-μm cell strainer (Falcon 352340) and washed twice. The responded cells were lysed with red blood cell lysis buffer (ACK) and incubated with mouse immunoglobulin G in FACS buffer for 15 min at 4°C. Tumor-infiltrating cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated anti–mouse antibodies, as well as appropriate isotype control antibodies. The following monoclonal antibodies and reagents were obtained from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA, United States): anti-CD45 (30-F11, 1:200 dilution), anti-CD3 (clone 145-2c11, 1:200 dilution), anti-CD4 (GK1.5, 1:200 dilution), and anti-CD8 (clone 53–6.7, 1:200 dilution). Flow cytometry was carried out with LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (v.10.4; Tree Star, San Carlos, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of Stromal Vascular Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SVF was prepared as reported55 (link),59 (link),60 (link). Briefly, inguinal SAT or VAT were isolated from euthanized mice, minced and digested for 60 min in DMEM containing collagenase type I (2 mg/ml per gram of tissue; Invitrogen) at 37°C. Cell suspensions were then filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer and the SVF was collected as a pellet after centrifugation at 500g for 5 min. After RBC lysis, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD), anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, BioLegend), anti-CD11b (M1/70, BD), anti-CD11c (HL3, BD), anti-CD206 (c06802, BioLegend; MR5D3, Acris), anti-TNF (MP6-XT22, BioLegend), anti-iNOS (CXNFT, eBioscience) and anti-CD49d [clone PS/2, AbD Serotec or clone 9C10(MFR4.B), BioLegend]. Cells were analyzed in a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of Stromal Vascular Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SVF was prepared as reported55 (link),59 (link),60 (link). Briefly, inguinal SAT or VAT were isolated from euthanized mice, minced and digested for 60 min in DMEM containing collagenase type I (2 mg/ml per gram of tissue; Invitrogen) at 37°C. Cell suspensions were then filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer and the SVF was collected as a pellet after centrifugation at 500g for 5 min. After RBC lysis, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD), anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, BioLegend), anti-CD11b (M1/70, BD), anti-CD11c (HL3, BD), anti-CD206 (c06802, BioLegend; MR5D3, Acris), anti-TNF (MP6-XT22, BioLegend), anti-iNOS (CXNFT, eBioscience) and anti-CD49d [clone PS/2, AbD Serotec or clone 9C10(MFR4.B), BioLegend]. Cells were analyzed in a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The harvested spleens were mashed and single-cell suspensions of the spleens were stained with the following surface antibodies: anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD Biosciences), LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue cell stain (Invitrogen), anti-CD19 (ID3, BD Biosciences), anti-CD8a (53-6.7, BioLegend), anti-CD27 (LG7F9, eBioscience), anti-CD11b (M1/70, BioLegend), anti-CD11c (HL3, BD Biosciences), anti-CD86 (GL1, BioLegend), anti-NK1.1 (PK136, BioLegend), anti-NKp46 (29A1.4, BioLegend), anti-MHC Class II (M5/114.15.2, BD Biosciences), anti-F4/80 (BM8, BioLegend), anti-CD80 (16-10A1), anti-CD3 (17A2, BioLegend), anti-CD4 (RM4-5, Invitrogen), anti-CTLA-4 (UC10-4B9, BioLegend), anti-PD-1 (29F.1A12, eBioscience), anti-CD28 (37.51, BioLegend), anti-CD44 (IM7, BD Biosciences), anti-CD43 (1B11, BioLegend), anti-CD47 (miap301, BioLegend), anti-CD62L (MEL-14, BioLegend), anti-CD25 (PC61.5, eBioscience), and anti-CD107a (1D4B, BioLegend). Intracellular staining was then performed with a FOXP3 permeabilization and fixation kit (eBioscience) according to manufacturer’s recommendations using the following antibodies: Ki-67 (B56; BD Biosciences) and GrB (QA16A02, BioLegend). Flow cytometric data were collected with a Beckman Coulter Cytoflex LX (6-L NUV) flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Microglia and Macrophages by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infiltrating macrophages and microglia were enumerated by flow cytometry as previously described [28 (link)]. Briefly, at d30 p.i., brains from mice perfused with ice-cold PBS were individually homogenized in 4 ml of RPMI medium containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, using chilled Tenbroeck tissue grinders. To separate myelin debris, homogenates were resuspended in 30% Percoll (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), underlaid with 1 ml 70% Percoll, and isolated from the 30/70% interface following centrifugation at 800×g for 30 min at 4 °C. Following washing of cells, non-specific antibody binding was prevented by incubation in FACS buffer supplemented with anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and 10% of mixture of normal goat, human, mouse, and rat serum for 15 min on ice. Cells were stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD Biosciences) APC and anti-CD11b (M1/70, BD Biosciences) PE mAb for 25 min on ice. Flow cytometric analysis was performed using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Samples were analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR). CD45int CD11b+ microglia were distinguished from CD45hi CD11b+ macrophages based on their differential CD45 expression as shown previously [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Tumor Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to analyze the tumor immune microenvironment. All tumor tissue samples per group were collected. Cells from the tumors were counted and cell surface markers were stained with the following fluorescently conjugated antibodies: anti-CD45 (30F11, BD Biosciences), anti-CD4 (RM4-5, BD Biosciences), anti-CD8 (53-6.7, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD3 (17A2, BD Biosciences), antiCD11b (M1/70, Invitrogen), anti-PD-1 (10F.9G2, BioLegend), anti-CD25 (PC61, Biolegend), anti-CD49b (DX5, BD Biosciences), anti-Granzyme b/Cryofix (GB11, Invitrogen), Viability UV Zombie. Flow cytometry data were acquired on the BD LSRFortessa X20 cytometer and FlowJo software (Ashland, OR, USA) was used for analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Skin Biopsy and Cell Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biopsies of 0.6 cm in diameter were taken of the injection site, and skin was mechanically disrupted using a sterile scalpel in PBS containing 2 mM EDTA. The resulting cell suspension was stained in 0.5% FBS/PBS 2 mM EDTA using anti-B220 (RA3-6B2, BD Pharmingen), anti-Cd11c (N418, eBiosciences), anti-Cd45 (30-F11, BD Pharmingen), anti-Pdca1 (927, BioLegend), anti-Cd31 (390, eBiosciences), anti-Ki67 (SolA15, eBiosciences), and anti-BrdU (Bu20A, eBiosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Analysis of Implantation Site Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Implantation sites were harvested as described above. Each site was cut into 12 pieces and placed in RPMI 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). These pieces were digested in RPMI containing 5% FBS, 300 μg/ml collagenase F (Sigma-Aldrich), 200 μg/ml collagenase L (Sigma-Aldrich), 500 μg/ml Dispase (Gibco), and 2 U/ml DNase-1 (Roche) at 37°C for 30 to 45 min with a magnetic stir bar for agitation. Cells were passed over a 70 μm strainer (BD) to create a single cell suspension. Implantation sites were washed in DPBS, 1% FBS, 25 mM EDTA. Cells were stained for FACS with anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD), anti-CD11b (M1/70, BD), anti-Gr-1 (RB6-8C5, BD), and rabbit anti-Crry followed by a donkey anti-rabbit DyLight 488 (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Blocking for FACS was carried out employing DPBS, 1% FBS, 25 mM EDTA with 5% donkey serum and 5% mouse serum. Cells were examined employing a FACScan (BD) retrofitted with a Cytek Upgrade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell sorting and flow cytometry analysis, cell suspension were prepared as described above, incubated with fixable viability dye and subsequently stained with following fluorophore-conjugated monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD45 (30-F11, BD Biosciences), anti-CD45.2 (104, Biolegend), anti-CD90.2 (thy1.2) (53–2.1, Biolegend), anti-CD3 (17A2, Biolegend), anti-CD4 (Biolegend, RM4–5), anti-CD8 (53–6.7, Biolegend), anti-CD11b (M1/70; Biolegend), anti-CD11c (N418, Biolegend), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4, Biolegend), anti-Ly6G (1A8, BD Biosciences), anti-Siglec-F (E50–2440, BD Bioscience), anti-mouse MHC Class II (I-A/I-E) (M5/114.15.2, eBioscience), anti-NK1.1 (PK136, Biolegend), anti-CD19 (6D5, Biolegend), anti-T1/ST2 (DJ8, MD Biosciences), anti-KLRG1 (2F1, Biolegend), anti-FoxP3 (FJK-16S, eBiosciences), anti-Ki-67 (16A8, Biolegend), anti-Gata3 (TWAJ, eBioscience), anti-IL13 (eBio13A, eBioscience), anti-IFNgR1 (XMG1.2, BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!