The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using 6 n propylthiouracil

1

Investigating Taste Receptor Signaling in Smooth Muscle Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dextromethorphan hydrobromide, chloroquine, denatonium benzoate, quinine hydrochloride, phenylthiocarbamide (PTC), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), sodium thiocyanate, salicin, nicotine, yohimbine, colchicine, thiamine, caffeine, chloramphenicol and picrotoxinin were purchased from Sigma. Fluo-4 NW calcium assay kit was purchased from Invitrogen. hPASMCs and hASMCs were either purchased from ATCC or were a kind gift from Dr. Andrew Halayko, Dept. of Physiology, University of Manitoba. Cell culture media and hPASMC growth kit were purchased from Cedarlane, Canada. Nucleofection kit for smooth muscle cell transfection was purchased from Lonza. Polyclonal antibodies specific for T2R1, T2R38 and normal IgG specific rabbit antisera were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA) respectively [6] (link), [7] (link). Phospho-MLC-Ser19 monoclonal antibody and MLC polyclonal antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling technology (Danvers, MA, USA). DyNazyme hot start was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Toronto, ON, Canada). The shRNA specific for T2R1 was purchased from Qiagen (Toronto, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Activity Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals used in this study included Ethanol, (±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), Ammonium Acetate, Copper (II) Chloride Dehydrate, Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent, Gallic Acid, Neocuprine, and Sodium Carbonate and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, Sydney, Australia). The DI water was prepared using the Millipore water purification system (Millipore Australia, North Ryde, NSW, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Propylthiouracil Using Spectrophotometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PROP preparation and quantification were performed as described.17 (link) Briefly, 50 mg propylthiouracil (PTU) tablets were purchased from T.O. Chemical manufacturer. No. 1 Whatman filters (3 cm diameter, Sigma-Aldrich) were cut in half and saturated with a 50-mmol/L PROP solution. PROP was eluted from randomly selected saturated disks by incubating each disk in 20 mL methanol overnight at room temperature. The amount of PROP in the impregnated filter paper disks was quantified using spectrophotometry. Pure PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in methanol and used as a standard. The PROP standard was prepared at 6 concentrations (0–0.01 mg/mL). The absorbance of PROP in the methanol solution was measured at a 275-nm wavelength. A calibration curve was constructed and the extracted PROP concentration was determined. We ascertained that the mean amount of PROP per disk was 0.412 ± 0.017 mg, and the percentage coefficient of variation across the disks (n = 3) was 4.2%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring PROP Bitterness Perception

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PROP testing strips were prepared using 8.5 g of 6-n-propylthiouracil (Sigma Catalog #P3755) in 500 mls of distilled water. This mixture was stirred on a hotplate until dissolved. Whatman’s No. 1 filter paper was then briefly and completely submerged into the solution, removed and allowed to dry. Dry PROP papers were cut into 1 cm2 strips and stored at room temperature in a sterile petri dish sealed with Parafilm. For each experiment, subjects were first asked to rinse their mouths with distilled water. The investigator then removed a single PROP testing strip from the petri dish using sterile forceps and placed it on the subject’s palm. The subject placed the PROP strip onto the anterior tip of their tongue for 15 seconds and rated the intensity of the taste using a ratio scale, the general Labeled Magnitude Scale, which was developed for sensory testing including PROP bitterness perception and comparison. This scale ranges from 0 (not detectable) to 100 (strongest imaginable sensation of any kind) [77 (link), 78 ]. Participant responses were recorded by hand and then included in each subject’s coded file.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!