The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dfc490

Manufactured by Leica Microsystems
Sourced in Germany

The DFC490 is a digital camera designed for microscopy applications. It features a high-resolution sensor and supports a range of image formats.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using dfc490

1

Quantification of c-Fos Positive Nuclei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification was performed by systematically sampling each selected region using counting frames superimposed over the region with a microscope (Leica Microsystems DFC490, Germany) coupled to a computer with the Leica Application Suite X software (Leica Microsystems, Germany) with a total magnification of 192X. The sizes of the counting frames were 250,000 μm for CG, PL and IL and 72,000 μm for CA1, CA3 and DG. The total area sampled by these frames per region in each section was: 500,000 μm for CG, PL and IL; 144,000 μm for CA1 and CA3 and finally, 72,000 μm for DG. c-Fos-positive nuclei were defined based on homogenous gray-black stained elements with a well-defined border. Finally, the mean c-Fos positive nuclei count in two sections was calculated for each subject and region.
The regions of interest and their distances (mm) counted from bregma according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (2007) were: +3.24 mm for the cingulate cortex (CG), prelimbic cortex (PL) and infralimbic cortex (IL) and -3.24 mm for the CA1, CA3, and the dentate gyrus (DG) sub-fields of the dorsal hippocampus. In these regions, we quantified the number of c-Fos positive nuclei in two alternate sections 30 μm apart. The slides were coded so that the researcher who performed the entire analysis did not know the treatment of the individual subjects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histochemical GUS Staining and TCP13 Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histochemical GUS staining was performed as described previously (Urano et al. 2004 (link)), and GUS was observed using an M205C stereomicroscope equipped with a DFC490 digital color camera (Leica Microsystems). To determine the subcellular localization of TCP13, plasmid DNA (5 μg) isolated from 35Spro::TCP13-sGFP plants was transfected into Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts, and GFP was detected under a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510; Zeiss). Arabidopsis protoplast isolation and PEG-calcium transfection were performed as described previously (Yoo et al. 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Optic Nerve Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After culture, NR explants were fixed for 2 hours in 4% paraformaldehyde (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) and processed in an automatic tissue processor (Leica ASP300; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). One paraffin block per NR was made and 5 μm thick sections were obtained with a microtome (Microm HM340E; Microm International GmbH part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Walldorf, Germany).
For NR histological characterization, sections were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in a series of descending alcohols, rinsed in deionized distilled water, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H-E) (Sigma-Aldrich®). Stained sections were dehydrated in a series of ascending alcohols, cleared in xylene, mounted, and cover-slipped. NR samples were analyzed with a light microscope (DM4000B; Leica Microsystems), and images were acquired with a digital camera (DFC490; Leica Microsystems). Brightness and contrast were minimally adjusted, and the final figures were composed with Pixelmator 3.8 Phoenix (Pixelmator Team, Vilnius, Lithuania).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antifungal Evaluation of OLE-loaded CTNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the antifungal activity of OLE-loaded CTNPs, the V. dahliae (AACC0021) strain was used. The isolation and identification of the strain were described in a previous study [33 ]. This strain was sub-cultured on potato dextrose broth (PDB) and incubated in darkness at 24 °C for 21 days. Briefly, 20 µL of the suspension was taken to prepare the slides using a Malassez cell. The samples were observed under an optical microscope (DMRB Leica Microsystems, Milan, Italy) at 400× magnification, equipped with a digital camera (DFC490 Leica Microsystems) and conidiospores were quantified. Thereafter, the samples were divided into 1.5 mL aliquots and stored at −80 °C in 25% of glycerol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Seed Viability and Dormancy Using Tetrazolium Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seed viability was assessed with tetrazolium staining as described in the Tetrazolium Testing Handbook (2000). In each experiment, 4 batches of 20 seeds were separated from their florets and imbibed in distilled water at room temperature overnight. Seeds were bisected longitudinally through the embryo and both halves were retained for staining in a 1% tetrazolium solution for 24 h in the dark. Samples were then observed with a Leica MZ16FA stereomicroscope equipped with a DFC490 camera (Leica Microsystems Ltd., Heerbrugg). Seeds were declared viable or dead according to the staining pattern of the embryo (Association of Official Seed Analysts, 2000 ). To assess the level of seed dormancy, the percentage of seeds that had germinated after 10 days was compared to the percentage of viable seeds (see statistical analyses section). Samples were identified as having some dormant seeds when the percentage of viable seeds was statistically significantly higher than percentages of germinated seeds. Germination tests were done on 4 replicates of 20 naked seeds and 4 batches of in-floret-seeds to rule out any glume-imposed seed dormancy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Sweat Gland Innervation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All identifying information on the slides was masked before quantification. Sections were observed under a ×20 objective on a DM2500 light microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a DFC490 charge‐coupled device (Leica Microsystems). The acquired image was then opened with Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) to quantitate sweat gland innervation. The areas of PGP 9.5+ nerve fibers and Congo red–stained sweat glands were measured on each section. We designated SGII of the selected sweat gland according to the formula: SGII = nerve fiber area/sweat gland area × 100%, which represented the area of nerve fibers normalized to the area of the sweat gland according to our previous report of quantifying sweat gland innervations.9 The mean of all SGIIs (3–7 sweat glands from 3 different sections for each subject) was defined as the SGII of a given subject. The normative values of SGII based on PGP 9.5 staining (SGIIPGP 9.5; mean ± standard deviation [SD], 5th percentile) from our laboratory were 4.33% ± 1.32%, 2.36% for males and 5.33% ± 1.41%, 2.69% for females.9 SGIIPGP 9.5 was classified as abnormal if SGIIPGP 9.5 was <2.36% and <2.69% for males and females, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing TCP13 Subcellular Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histochemical GUS staining was performed as described previously (Urano et al. 2004 ), and GUS was observed using an M205C stereomicroscope equipped with a DFC490 digital color camera (Leica Microsystems). To determine the subcellular localization of TCP13, plasmid DNA (5 μg) isolated from 35Spro::TCP13-sGFP plants was transfected into Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts, and GFP was detected under a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510; Zeiss). Arabidopsis protoplast isolation and PEG-calcium transfection were performed as described previously (Yoo et al. 2007) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!