The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using sodium dihydrogen phosphate

1

Analytical Method for Fenofibrate and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals used in this study were obtained from commercial suppliers. Fenofibrate, (2-[4-(4-chlorobenzoyl) phenoxy]-2-methylpropionic acid 1-methylethyl ester) and its metabolite, fenofibric acid (FA, purity >99.5%), were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). The internal standard fluvastatin was obtained from Riyadh Pharma Industry Ltd. (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). Details of the lipids (oils and nonionic surfactants), their compositions, and suppliers are provided in Table 1. All excipients were used without further purification. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade methanol, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and sodium chloride were purchased from BDH Laboratory Supplies (Poole, UK). The 1 M HCl, which was diluted to obtain 0.1 M solution, was provided by Avonchem (Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK). Rat plasma containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as anticoagulant was collected in-house. Water used in this study was obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Sartorius, Geottingen, Germany). All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical purity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sericin Extraction from Raw Silk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Australian merino wool tops were purchased from Misr Company for Spinning and Weaving, Egypt. The mean fibre diameter of the used fibre was 20.2 µm. The acid dye, C.I. Acid Blue 203, was kindly supplied by Egypt Colors Company, Cairo, Egypt. Absolute ethanol and nutrient agar were provided by Fluka Switzerland. Agar was purchased from SD Fine chemicals, Mumbai. Glucose, magnesium sulphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate were purchased from BDH chemicals LTD, England. Folin’s reagent was supplied by Loba Chemie. All other used chemicals were of laboratory grade and used as they were supplied. Sericin was extracted from raw silk according to Oh et al. (2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fenofibrate Lipid-based Formulation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals/materials used in the studies were obtained from well-known commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Fenofibrate, (2-[4-(4-chlorobezoyl) phenoxy]-2-methylpropionic acid 1-methylethyl ester) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co, St. Louis, MO, United States. All lipids (oils, non-ionic surfactants), their compositions and suppliers’ details are given in Table 1. HPLC grade methanol and lipolysis buffer contents, i.e., saline solution, sodium dihydrogen phosphate and sodium chloride were purchased from BDH laboratory supplies (BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole, United Kingdom). Simulated Intestinal Fluid (SIF) powder, was obtained from biorelevant.com (Corydon, Surrey, CR2 0BS, United Kingdom) to make fasted and fed state intestinal fluid (FaSSIF and FeSSIF). Porcine pancreatin (8_USP specifications activity) were from Sigma Chemical Co. St Louis, MO, United States. Digestion inhibitor, 4 bromophenylboronic acid (4-BPBA) was obtained from Aldrich Chemicals Co. St Louis, MO, United States. 1 M sodium hydroxide (Titrisol), was purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. High purity Milli-Q water was obtained through a Milli-Q pure lab flex (Veolia water).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluation of Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STZ (Streptozotocin) and 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) (Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), α-amylase (Blulux Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Faridaban, India), Acarbose (Bayer, Germany), Aluminum chloride, sodium carbonate, sodium nitrate, starch, sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate, disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate (BDH Laboratory Supplies Ltd, England), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazine (DPPH), Galic acid, qurcetin and Folin-Ciocalteu's reagent (Sigm Chemicals Co, St. Louis, MO, USA), glibenclamide (Sanof–Aventis, USA) and glucose (Munchen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Grade Chemicals for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals used during the experiments were of analytical grade and were not further purified before usage. Graphite rods (6 mm diameter, 99.995% purity); potassium chloride (KCl, 99.98%); sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4, 100%) and di-sodium hydrogen phosphate anhydrous (Na2HPO4, 99.7%) were supplied by VWR Chemicals (Leuven, Belgium). Sodium acetate anhydrous (CH3COONa, ≥99.0%); ammonium sulphate ((NH4)2SO4, ≥99.0%), sodium chloride (NaCl, 99.5%); sodium carbonate anhydrous (Na2CO3, 99.3%), magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2∙6H2O, 99–102%); magnesium sulphate (MgSO4, 99%); magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)2∙6H2O, 99%) were provided by REACTIVUL Bucuresti (Bucharest, Romania). Potassium ferrocyanide K4[Fe(CN)6] and L(+)-Ascorbic acid (C6H8O6, AA, ≥99%) were acquired from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Sodium acetate anhydrous (CH3COONa, ≥99.0%) was purchased from ChimReactiv SRL (Bucharest, Romania). N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was acquired from Fluka Chemie GmbH (Buchs, Switzerland), while boric acid (H3BO3, 99%) was provided by Andra Chim SRL (Bucharest, Romania). The MQuant® Nitrite Test (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was employed for UV-Vis investigation of nitrite solutions. Deionized water with a resistivity of at least 18.2 MΩ × cm was used to prepare all solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chromatographic Analysis of Pharmaceuticals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acetonitrile used as solvent was purchased from VWR (Radnor, United States). The ion-pair reagents used were methanesulphonic acid anhydrous ≥ 98%, 1-pentanesulphonic acid anhydrous ≥ 98% from Loba Chemie (Mumbai, India) and 1-octanesulphonic acid monohydrate from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). Regarding buffering agents used, sodium dihydrogen phosphate ≥ 99.0% and orthophosphoric acid 85% were purchased from VWR (Radnor, United States); sodium hydroxide ≥ 97% and hydrogen peroxide 30% were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); hydrochloric acid 37% was purchased from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany); and sulfuric acid 96% was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The water used for all analyses came from the purification equipment 08.1205 from TKA Germany (Niederelbert, Germany). Buffered solution adjusted to pH 2.5–3.5 using sulfuric acid was used as diluent. All sample solutions were filtered before injecting into the chromatograph using nylon syringes filters (0.22 μm) from YETI Merz Brothers GmbH (Haid, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Okra Genotypes Disintegrant Formulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pods of five okra genotypes (Abelmoschus esculentus L), namely, Penkrumah, Agbagoma, Asha, Sengavi, and Balabi, (PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4, and PC5) were obtained from the Ghanaian market and authenticated at the Department of Horticulture, KNUST, Ghana. Maize starch BP (UK Chemicals) was used as the reference disintegrant in formulations coded F6, F12, and F18. Tragacanth BP (Sigma-Aldrich), paracetamol BP (Xi'an Henrikang Biotech Co., China), lactose, talc, disodium hydrogen phosphate, and sodium dihydrogen phosphate (VWR Chemicals, UK) were used. All other reagents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Moxifloxacin-based Antimicrobial Ocular Formulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MOX (>99% purity) was purchased from LC Labs (Woburn, MA). Formalin, PAM, sodium oleate, sodium laurate, and sodium chloride were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). High‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐grade acetonitrile, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and triethylamine were obtained from VWR International (Radnor, PA). Vigamox® (0.5% moxifloxacin eye drops, Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX) was obtained from the Johns Hopkins Pharmacy. Zirconium oxide beads (0.5 mm in diameter) were purchased from Next Advance (Averill Park, NY). Sterile cell strainers (100 μm) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH). Pluronic F127 (Poloxamer 407) was obtained as free samples from BASF Corporation (Tarrytown, NY). Tryptic soy agar, tryptic soy broth, sterile cotton‐tipped applicator, sterile disposable petri plates, and sterile phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) and 20‐G needles were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Walthum, MA). Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Proparacaine eye drops were obtained from Bausch and Lomb Inc. (Tampa, FL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrochemical Exfoliation of Graphite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High purity (99.995%) graphite rods (10 cm length; 6 mm diameter) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sternheim, Germany) and were employed during electrochemical exfoliation. Ammonium sulphate was bought from Reactivul Bucuresti (Bucharest, Romania), while the ammonia solution (25%) was purchased from POCH SA (Gliwice, Poland). Azithromycin (AZT) was purchased from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Limited (Mumbai, India), uric acid (≥99%, UA), dopamine hydrochloride (99%, DA), and dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Alfa-Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany), while L-tyrosine (Tyr) was purchased from Fluka BioChemika (Buchs, Switzerland). Glacial acetic acid (99.5%) was purchased from CHEMICAL COMPANY (Iași, Romania) and sodium acetate was purchased from Reactivul Bucuresti (Bucharest, Romania). Sodium dihydrogen phosphate (99.7%) and di-sodium hydrogen phosphate anhydrous (100%) were purchased from VWR Chemicals (Leuven, Belgium). Acetate buffer was employed for the preparation of the solutions with pH 3.6, 4.4, and 5. Phosphate buffer was employed for the preparation of the solutions with pH 6 and 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Wheat Gluten and Soy Glycinin Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gluten [83.2% protein, on dry matter (dm) basis] from wheat (cultivar Paragon, RAGT, Ickleton, United Kingdom) and soy glycinin (98.1% dm protein) from soy flour (L.I. Frank, Twello, The Netherlands) were isolated as in Lambrecht et al. (2015) . Gliadin was extracted from gluten (20.0 g) with 70% (v/v) ethanol (250 ml). After centrifugation (10 000 g, 10 min), ethanol was evaporated (Rotavapor R3000, Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) from the supernatant. Gliadin (87.7% dm protein) was freeze dried, ground in a laboratory mill (IKA, Staufen, Germany), and passed through a 250 µm sieve. BSA (fraction V for biochemistry, 98.2% dm protein) was from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium).
All chemicals were at least of analytical grade and from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany) unless specified otherwise. Dithiothreitol (DTT), disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate were from VWR International (Leuven, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!