The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using goat anti guinea pig igg hrp

1

Autophagy and Nutrient Sensing Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AMPKα (D5A2) Rabbit mAb (#5831, 1:1000), phospho- AMPKα (Thr172) (40H9) Rabbit mAb (#2535, 1:500), Raptor (24C12) Rabbit mAb (#2280, 1:500), phospho-Raptor (Ser792) Rabbit polyclonal antibody (pAb) (#2083, 1:500), mTOR (7C10) Rabbit mAb (#2983, 1:500), phospho-mTOR (Ser2481) Rabbit pAb (#2974, 1:500), 4E-BP1 (#9452, 1:500), phospho-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) (236B4) Rabbit mAb (#2855, 1:1000), ULK1 (D8H5) Rabbit mAb (#8054, 1:500), FIP200 (D10D11) Rabbit mAb (#12436, 1:250), LC3B Rabbit pAb (#2775, 1:1000) and Rabbit (DA1E) mAb IgG XP® Isotype Control (#3900) were from Cell Signaling Technology. Goat anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP pAb (sc-2004, 1:1000) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. NRBF2 Rabbit pAb (A301-851A) was from Bethyl Laboratories, Inc. P62 Guinea pig pAb (#GP62-C, 1:4000) was from PROGEN. P62 Guinea pig pAb (PM066, 1:4000) was from Medical and Biological Laboratories Co., LTD. (MBL). Goat anti-Mouse IgG-HRP (#A28177, 1:1000), goat anti-Guinea Pig IgG-HRP (#A18775, 1:1000) antibodies were from Thermo Scientific. PSD95 (6G6-1C9) mAb (#MA1–045, 1:1000) was from Thermo Scientific. VAMP2 Rabbit pAb (#104202, 1:5000) was from Synaptic Systems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibody Panel for Viral Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-β-actin (Abcam, # ab8227, WB (1:1,000)), anti-FLAG (Sigma, # F3165, WB (1:1,000), IFA (1:100)), anti-GFP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, # sc-9996, WB (1:2,000)), anti-HA epitope (Sigma, # H3663, WB (1:1,000)), anti-NP (BEI resources, # NR-4282, WB (1:1,000), IFA (1:100)), anti-NP (EMD Millipore, # MAB8800, IFA (1:1,000)), anti-HA from A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) (BEI resources, # NR-42021, IFA (1:100)), anti-influenza A/Aichi/2/68 (BEI resources, # NR-3125, IFA (1:100)), anti-PB1 (BEI resources, # NR-31690, WB (1:1,000)), anti-PB2 (Genetex, # GTX125926, WB (1:1,000)), anti-PA (Genetex, # GTX125932, WB (1:1,000)), anti-PKP2 (Fitzgerald Industries International, # 20R-2656, WB (1:1,000), IFA (1:100)), anti-CPSF4 (Millipore, # MABE620, WB (1:1,000)).
Goat anti-Mouse IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, # sc-2055, WB (1:10,000)), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, # sc-2030, WB (1:10,000)), Goat anti-Guinea Pig IgG-HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, # A18775, WB (1:10,000)), Alexa Fluor 594 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (Life Technologies, # A11005, IFA (1:200)), Alexa Fluor 488 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Life Technologies, # A11034, IFA (1:200)), Alexa Fluor 488 Goat Anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H+L) (Life Technologies, # A11073, IFA (1:200)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Ag-specific Antibodies in Immunized Animals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine Ag-specific antibodies in the immunized and tick immune animals, ELISA was performed as described previously (Narasimhan et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, 96-well plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with 200 ng of saliva or recombinant tick salivary lectin pathway inhibitor (TSLPI) diluted in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6 (Narasimhan et al., 2020 (link)). Plates were washed and blocked in PBS with 3% BSA and 0.02% Tween 20. Guinea pig and mouse sera were serially diluted and incubated in the wells for 2 hours and 37 °C. The sera dilutions utilized for ELISA are indicated on the figures. Wells were washed, and reactivity was detected using goat anti-guinea pig IgG-HRP (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA catalog # A18769; 1:10,000 dilution) or goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA; catalog # 31430; 1:2000 dilution) and TMB substrate (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!