The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using i21414

1

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Hearts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse hearts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, sectioned, stained, and imaged, following standard immunohistochemistry and fluorescent microscopy methods, as previously described [40 (link),41 (link)]. An extra antigen retrieval step was added in all experiments by heating samples in a Tris-based buffer (pH 9) to 95 °C for 20 min. Primary antibodies against cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (AB8295, Abcam), Ki67 (AB16667, Abcam), GFP (SC-9996, Santa Cruz), FGF23 (SC-16849, Santa Cruz), Klotho (SC-22220, Santa Cruz), and Isolectin B4-biotin (I21414, Invitrogen) were used. Alexa Fluor conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). TUNEL staining was performed using an Apoptosis/Necrosis detection kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Before mounting, the slides were incubated with 1% Sudan black (Sigma-Aldrich) in 75% ethanol at room temperature for 20 min to reduce tissue auto-fluorescence. Confocal images were acquired with an Olympus FLUOVIEW FV10i confocal microscope. Whole heart tissue section scanning was performed using TissueFAXS (TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria). High magnification images of 10 fields of the cardiac tissue were randomly acquired with a light microscope (Olympus BX53). The number of Ki67+ cells or TUNEL+ cells in each image was determined with the Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spinal Cord Immunohistochemistry of Lumbar Region

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinal cords were cut into 18μm sections. Different levels of spinal cord were identified with a 0.1% solution of cresyl violet (Harleco, Cat # 548-62-9) counterstaining guided by the rat spinal cord atlas (Anderson et al., 2009). Sections of levels 4-6 of the lumbar spinal cord which innervates the hindlimbs were stained with anti Iba1 (Iba1, 1:1000, Wako Cat# 019-19741, RRID: AB_839504). Layers of the dorsal horn were identified guided by IB4 neuronal projections with (1:1000, biotin conjugated, Invitrogen, Cat# I21414). All primary and secondary antibodies are listed on Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mice were perfused with PBS (G4202, Servicebio, Wuhan, China) and 4% paraformaldehyde (30525‐89‐4, Nanjing Chemical Reagent, Nanjing, China). After dehydration, permeation and embeddedness, the brain tissues were sliced by 10 μM thickness and placed in the same position of the six glass slides, and three brain slides are pasted on each glass slide. Next, dewaxing and hydration were carried out. The slices were blocked in 10% goat serum / PBST at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4℃. The dilutions of primary antibodies were used in the experiments included as follows: NeuN (1:500, ab177487, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Iba1 (1:500, NB100‐1028, Novus, Centennial, Colorado, USA), CD45 (1:200, ab40763, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Ly6G (1:200, #31469, CST, Boston, USA), IB4 (1:200, I21414, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), NF‐κB (p65) (1:200, ab32536, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Nrf‐2 (1:200, 16396–1‐AP, Proteintech, Chicago, USA) and Fyn (1:300, ab125016, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). The slices were washed by PBST and incubated with secondary antibodies (1:1000 dilution, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1h at room temperature. DAPI (C3619‐PI19B, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) was incubated for 10 minutes. The quantification of images was analysed with Image J software as previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!