The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

71 protocols using autochem 2 2920

1

Characterization of Nickel Adsorbents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sulfur concentrations of various samples are analyzed by an Antek 9000 total sulfur analyzer.
The crystalline structures of the adsorbents were character-ized through X-ray diffraction (XRD) by using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer with a Cu Kα = 0.154 nm monochromatized radiation source, operating at 40 kV and 100 mA.
The crystal lattice of the adsorbents was surveyed by JEM-2100 transmission electron microscope (TEM).
The dispersity and reducibility of Nickel were undertaken by using the H2/O2 pulse titration (HOPT) with a chemisorption analyzer Autochem II 2920(Micromeritics, USA).
Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) was surveyed by the analyzer Autochem II 2920(Micromeritics, USA).
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was characterized by the multi-function photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALAB 250Xi).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization and Cracking of Ni-Contaminated FCC Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out on a PANalytical X’pert pro diffractometer (Malvern, UK), operating at 40 kV, 40 mA, and scanning from 5° to 75° at a speed of 0.01°/s. Pyridine-adsorption Fourier transform infrared spectra (Py-FTIR) were recorded on a Burker TENSOR 27 instrument (Billerica, MA, USA). All samples were activated at 300 °C for 3 h before pyridine adsorption. NH3 temperature programed desorption (NH3-TPD) was performed on a Micromeritics AUTOCHEM II 2920 chemisorption instrument (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) in the range of 100–500 °C at a heating rate of 15 °C/min. The adsorption of ammonia on the samples was performed at room temperature, followed by removing physically adsorbed ammonia at 100 °C for 1 h in flowing pure nitrogen. H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) was measured on a Micromeritics AUTOCHEM II 2920 chemisorption instrument.
The prepared FCC catalyst was contaminated by nickel (Ni: 7000 ppm) using the incipient-wetness impregnation method with Ni(NO3)2·6H2O as a nickel source. The heavy oil catalytic cracking performance of the FCC catalysts after aging treatment (800 °C, 17 h in 100% steam) was evaluated on an advanced cracking evaluation unit (ACE, Kayser. R+Multi). The properties of the heavy oil feed are listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) was carried out on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE diffractometer fitted with Cu–K radiation to determine the phase identity of the synthesized samples. The specific surface area of each sample was measured by using a Micromeritics ASAP 2460 Surface Area and Porosity Analyzer with the BET method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were examined by using a JEOL model JEM 2010 EX instrument. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) was recorded on a FEI Tecnai G2F20 instrument and operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Surface electronic states were analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with an AXIS ULTRA spectrometer. The amount of catalyst elements was determined using the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES), Perkin-Elmer Optima 3000V. Furthermore, the basic properties of samples were determined using temperature-programmed desorption with CO2 as a probe molecule, which were performed on a Micromeritics AutoChem 2920 II instrument with the temperature-programmed mode. The amount of CO2 desorbed in the temperature range of 100–900 °C was detected by thermal conductivity detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

H2 Reduction Profile of Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This analysis was carried out on a Micromeritics Autochem 2920 II instrument equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). To remove the adsorbed water and impurities, the catalyst powder (∼60 mg) was pretreated in an Ar gas stream (50 mL min−1) at 300 °C for 2 h. After cooling to 30 °C, the sample was heated to 800 °C at a rate of 50 °C min−1 under the flow of H2/Ar (1/9, v/v; 30 mL min−1) gas mixture. The consumed amount of H2 was monitored by a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Calibration of TCD was performed by reduction of standard Ag2O powder.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Platinum Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (ACS grade) and used as received unless otherwise noted. Powder XRD patterns were recorded with a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer by using nickel-filtered Cu-Kα radiation (λ=1.5406 Å). Scanning electron microscope images were taken by a JEOL JSM-7600 field-emission scanning electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. TEM images were taken by a JEOL JEM 2100 TEM at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. ICP spectroscopy was conducted on a Dual-view Optima 5300 DV ICP-OEM system. The pH value of the reaction system was monitored by Mettler Toledo FE-20. The numbers of active sites on the surface of Pt were determined from CO chemisorption using an automated catalyst characterization system (Autochem II 2920) from Micromeritics Instrument Corporation equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. The samples were treated at 423 K for 60 min and then cooled to room temperature in a He flow of 50 ml min−1. The CO chemisorption was measured at 293 K by introducing pulses of 5% CO–He flow (50 ml min−1) until adsorption saturation. Stoichiometric factor (Pt:CO molar ratio in the chemisorption) is taken as 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Advanced Membrane Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were recorded on JSM-6510 microscopy and JEOL FE-SEM 6700 F microscopy. TEM images were obtained on JEOL JEM-2100F. CAs were measured on the Data-Physics OCA20 machine at ambient temperature and each value was obtained by measuring five different positions. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements were carried out at 77.35 K on ASAP2020 after the samples being degassed at 350 °C under vacuum for 10 h. Fourier transform infrared spectrum was recorded from 400 to 4000 cm-1 on a Nicolet Impact 410 FTIR spectrometer. The TPD experiments were performed by using a Micromeritics AutoChem II 2920 automated chemisorption analysis unit with a thermal conductivity detector under helium flow. The separation efficiency was measured by OIL480 infrared spectrometer oil content analyzer. Optical microscopy images were taken on a CMM-55E (Leica, Germany). The mechanical properties of the membranes were measured using a testing device 410R250 (TestResources, Shakopee, MN) and five samples were tested for each stack.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

NH3-TPD Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A chemisorption apparatus (Micromeritics Auto Chem II 2920) with 0.2 g catalyst was used to collect NH3-TPD profiles. Before that, the catalysts were preheated for 1 h at 300 °C in a helium flow and then cooled down to 100 °C for 5% NH3/He 1 h. The physically adsorbed NH3 was removed by purging He for another 1 h. When the samples were heated at a rate of 10°C min−1 from 100 to 500 °C, with aggregation rate of 50 mL min−1 with He, the profiles of the catalysts were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Surface Reducibility of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 9

The surface reducibility of the fresh catalysts was probed via H2-TPR on Micromeritics AutoChem-II 2920 unit equipped with a TCD detector (manufactured by Micromeritics, 4356 Communications Dr. Norcross, GA 30093-2901, U.S.A). 100 mg of catalyst is preheated in a quartz tube to 300° C. under Ar flow regulated at 50 mL/min, and the temperature was maintained for 3 h. Before the temperature reduction analysis, the sample is cooled to room temperature. Subsequently, a mixture of Ar and 10% by volume H2 was flown at the rate of 50 mL/min while linearly heating the sample at the rate of 10° C./min up to 850° C. The signal is recorded with calibrated TCD detector.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Catalyst Morphology Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of each preparation step on the catalyst morphology was investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, SU8020) at an accelerating voltage of 15.0 kV. The surface properties were determined by measuring the water contact angle using the static sessile drop method with a Contact angle analyzer (Phoenix 300, SEO, Suwon, Korea). The contact angle of the prepared catalysts (thickness = about 0.2 cm) was measured within 10 s after dropping water
The crystallinity of and impurities in the catalysts were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan, Ultima IV) with Cu Kα (λ = 0.15406 nm) radiation in the 2θ range of 10° to 80° at a scan rate of 1°/min. The Si and N elements in the catalysts were measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Thermo VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, K Alpha+) with Al Kα radiation; the binding energy of C1s was normalized to 284.8 eV. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 670 FTIR) was carried out over a wavelength range of 400–4000 cm−1.
H2-temperature-programmed reduction was carried out using an AutoChem II 2920 (Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA). The samples were exposed to a current of 10% H2/Ar and measured in the 200–900 °C temperature range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CO2 Adsorption-Desorption Profiling of PEI/SiO2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CO2 adsorption–desorption profiles were collected by a TGA-MS setup (Supplementary Fig. 5). Before the measurements, PEI/SiO2 and nEB-PEI/SiO2 were degassed at 100 °C for 1 h under N2 flow (50 cm3 min−1). CO2 adsorption was carried out using a simulated wet flue gas containing 15% CO2, 3% H2O, 2% Ar (the internal standard for MS calibration) and N2 balance at 40 °C. After 30 min adsorption, the gas was switched to 100% CO2 flow (50 cm3 min−1) and the temperature was increased to 120 °C (ramp: 20 °C min−1). Then the temperature was maintained for 30 min for the desorption process. The adsorption–desorption cycle was repeated 50 times. The adsorbed amount of CO2 was calculated by subtraction of the adsorbed H2O amount (determined with MS) from the total mass increase determined from TGA. To confirm the reliability of the TGA-MS results, CO2 uptake was also cross-checked with an automated chemisorption analyser (Micromeritics, Autochem II 2920) specially equipped with a cold trap for H2O removal in front of a thermal conductivity detector (Supplementary Fig. 6). In all measurements, samples were diluted 10 times by using sand (quartz) as a diluent for avoiding heat-transfer limitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!