The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evis exera 2

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The EVIS EXERA II is a medical imaging system designed for endoscopic procedures. It provides high-quality video and image capture capabilities for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The system includes a video processor, light source, and other components to support a range of endoscopic instruments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using evis exera 2

1

Ileocolonoscopy and Crohn's Disease Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ileocolonoscopy was performed by two gastroenterologists using endoscopy devices of Olympus evis exera II (Olympus, Japan) and Fujinon VP-4450 HD (Fujinon, Japan). All colonic segments could be passed up to the terminal ileum and visualized adequately (Figure 1). The entire ileocolonic tract was subdivided into five segments: terminal ileum (distal 15–20 cm of ileum), right colon (cecum and ascending colon), transverse colon, left colon (descending colon and sigmoid), and rectum. The severity of CD inflammation in each segment was scored between 0 and 3 by SES-CD as follows: presence and size of ulcers on the mucosal surface, affected ulcerated area, proportion of affected surface, and presence or absence of narrowing [7 (link)]. A segmental SES-CD score ranging between 0–12 was calculated by summing these scores. Finally, a total SES-CD for each patient was calculated from the sum of the segmental scores. Overall disease activity was then inferred from the total SES-CD for each patient based on the following classification: 0–2 inactive, 3–6 mild, 7–15 moderate, >15 severe [24 (link)]. Thus, patients with a SES-CD score ≥ 7 were categorized having moderate to severe disease.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Olympus Colonoscopy Equipment Specifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The colonoscopy equipment and processing unit were manufactured by Olympus® America Inc. (Southborough, Massachusetts), Three colonovideoscope models were used: EVIS EXERA III (CF-HQ190L/I—Sn: 2876181), EVIS EXERA II (PCF-H180AL/I—Sn: 2109101), and EVIS EXERA III (PCF-H190DL/I—Sn: 2840944, 2840948). The Imaging System Video Processor model used is EVIS EXERA III CV-190.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thoracic Tumor Imaging Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A thorax/lung model was developed and built in silicone for the study providing the possibility to perform a completely standardized LAT procedure from administration of local anaesthesia to inspection of the thoracic cavity and biopsy (Figure 2). Five predetermined tumors were distributed in the pleural cavity. All necessary equipment was available including the thoracoscope (LTF-160 and EVIS Exera II, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flexible Bronchoscopy for Diagnostic Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluoroscopy was available for all procedures. FB was performed by four trained pulmonary physicians who were blinded to the echocardiographic findings. Oxygen was administered to all the patients to ensure peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) >90% prior to introduction of the bronchoscope. Continuous pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram, and noninvasive blood pressure monitoring were obtained throughout the procedure. Sedation was achieved using midazolam and analgesic treatment included alfentanil 50–100 μg. Topical anesthesia was obtained using 2% lidocaine. All hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, and O2 saturation were monitored during and after the procedure, until the patient awoke and stabilized.
Bronchoscopy was performed with white light illumination in all patients and narrow band imaging in 47 patients (Olympus EVIS EXERA II, Olympus, Hamburg Germany). Interventions conducted during FB included bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for cytology and cultures in all cases, as well as endobronchial brushings, TBB, endobronchial biopsies, and transbronchial needle aspiration, as indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Endoscopic NIR-FME Evaluation of Colorectal Adenomas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endoscopy was performed after standard bowel preparation, optionally under conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. All procedures were performed with a routine clinical HD video endoscope, which is standard of care during surveillance endoscopies (CF-H180AL/I or GIF-H180J; EVIS EXERA II; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). White light was provided by a standard xenon light source (CLV-180 EVIS EXERA II; Olympus Corporation), in which a short pass filter was installed (<750 nm, E700SP-2P; Chroma, Bellows Falls, VT, USA). When the caecum or ileorectal anastomosis was reached, the NIR-FME probe was introduced in the working channel of the video endoscope (online Figure S1A) 13 (link). During withdrawal, adenomas were concurrently visualized with both the video endoscope and the NIR-FME probe. The NIR-FME images (color, fluorescence and overlay) were displayed on a separate monitor (Figure 2). Subsequently, all large adenomas (≥5 mm; standard clinical care) and a maximum of six small adenomas (<3 mm) were excised. Additionally, four biopsies of normal appearing colorectal mucosa were taken for research purposes only. See supplementary materials for detailed information on tracer production and the technical background of the NIR-FME system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Endoscopic Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the beginning of each study procedure, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with a standard high definition, white light gastroscope (GIF-H180 with Evis Exera II processor; Olympus America, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA) was performed to identify the location and macroscopic extension of BE-associated neoplasia. NBI was used to screen for irregular vascular patterns. Dye spraying (e. g., with acetic acid) was not allowed at this point of the examination in order to avoid visual interference with the subsequent CLE. In patients who had a short BE segment and did not have a large hiatal hernia, a transparent hood was attached to the tip of the endoscope to stabilize its position in the distal esophagus during inspection of the mucosa. Areas with macroscopic features suspicious for neoplasia were numbered consecutively, documented by picture capturing, and marked circumferentially on the pictures by the endoscopist who performed the examination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bronchoscopy Simulation with 3D Lung Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The simulated set-up included an endoscopy tower with a flexible bronchoscope (EVIS Exera II and Q180 flexible bronchoscope, Olympus, Japan). The phantom was a bronchoscopy model equipped with a three-dimensional bronchial tree (CLA Broncho Boy, CLA, Coburg, Germany). The right lung has ten segments (segments #1–#3 in the upper lobe; #4 and #5 in the middle lobe; #6–#10 in the lower lobe), while the left lung has eight segments (#1–#3 in the upper lobe with #1–#2 fused together to form one segment; #4–#5 in lingula; #6–#10 in the lower lobe without a segment #7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Endoscopic Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EGD was performed by using a high-definition standard gastroscope (Evis ExeraII; Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) under conscious sedation (intravenous midazolam). The distance from the upper incisors to the Z-line (squamous-columnar junction) and to the diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus were measured. An upward migration of the Z-line 2 cm (i.e., intrathoracic migration of the gastric sleeve) was considered noteworthy and recorded. Esophageal inflammatory lesions were classified according to the Los Angeles Classification [10] . Biliary-like reflux into the esophagus and cardial continence were also recorded. Cardial incontinence was evaluated during the retroflexion maneuver and was defined by a wide-open cardia allowing the passage of gastric fluid content into the esophagus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection and Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bowel preparation was done using a polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution (Peglec-Powder, Tablets India Limited). Full colonoscopy was performed using a video colonoscope (Q180AL, 2008483, and OLYMPUS EVIS EXERA II). All colonoscopies were performed by the same endoscopist. Tumor sites were classified as the right colon (cecum, ascending, and transverse colon), left colon (descending and sigmoid colon), and rectum (distal 18 cm). Location and size of polyps were noted before removal [Figure 1]. All lesions were removed and/or biopsied. Histopathological examination was performed by independent pathologists blinded to clinical findings. Polyps were classified as neoplastic (adenomas and adenocarcinomas) or nonneoplastic (i.e., hyperplastic polyps).[23 ] No complications occurred during colonoscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Colon Phantom Colonoscopy Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A human-based colon phantom (Kyoto Kaguku, Kyoto, Japan) was placed in standard configuration in a non-magnetic frame in the supine position (
Fig. 2). The phantom was covered with an opaque sheet to prevent participants from visualizing the location of the endoscope within the phantom. A pediatric colonoscope (Olympus PCF-H180AL, Tokyo, Japan) with an Olympus Evis Exera II light source (CLV-180) and video processor (CV-180) (Tokyo, Japan) was used as the conventional colonoscope. The video feed from the MFE and pediatric colonoscope (PCF) were connected to the same external monitor located above the phantom to display the appropriate single feed when in use (
Fig. 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!