The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using zen 2012 blue edition software

1

Fluorescence Microscopy of Fluorescent Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
YFP, GFP, and RFP fluorescence was observed with an Axio Imager.M2 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) with an epifluorescence HXP 120 illuminator (Zeiss) at 2–3 days post-infiltration (dpif). A GFP filter (Zeiss) with bandpass 470/40 nm for excitation and 525/50 nm for emission was used for GFP and YFP, and an RFP filter with bandpass 546/12 nm for excitation and 575–640 nm for emission was used for RFP. Images were acquired with an AxioCamMR3 controlled by ZEN 2012 blue edition software (Zeiss).
Confocal microscopy was carried out 3 dpif with a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS device using a 63× water immersion objective at the Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, as described [25 (link)], and the resulting images were analyzed using Leica LAS AF Lite.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Fixation, Staining, and Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C and subsequently were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin as previously described56 (link). Tissues were rehydrated and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma–Aldrich, USA). Slides were mounted with Fluka Eukitt quick-hardening mounting medium (Sigma–Aldrich, USA). Images were obtained using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope with a Zeiss FLUAR 10x/0.5 NA objective and PALMRobo V4.3 software (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
The TUNEL assay was performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche). For immunofluorescence analyses, tissue sections were rehydrated and incubated in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) for 1 h and then incubated with the primary antibodies in 3% NGS overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, sections were washed and then incubated with respective secondary Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated antibodies (Invitrogen) for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were then mounted with Hoechst 33342 dye (Life Technologies, USA). Images were obtained using a LSM 710 confocal microscope with a Zeiss EC Plan-NEOFLUAR 20x/0.5 NA objective and were analyzed using ZEN 2012 Blue Edition software (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative and Qualitative Microglia Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the quantitative and qualitative analysis of microglia cells and the immunohistochemical analysis of 5-Lox, confocal microscopy images were taken with the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (LSM 700, Zeiss). For the analysis of 5-Lox expression and microglia cell numbers, confocal z-stacks were taken with the ZEN 2011 (black edition) software (Zeiss, version 3.3). Fluorescence images of three different brain slices were taken from five Y, AU, and AI animals per group (n = 5/group). Images with 20× and 63× magnification and 0.5 zoom were taken, the obtained z-stack was then combined and merged as maximum intensity projection. For each animal we used four representative areas of the brain that correspond to learning and memory, the hippocampus and the cortex. For all obtained images, the same microscope settings were used, pre-defined on a randomly picked animal of the AI group. The different brain areas were localized by eye.
All confocal images were edited and processed with the ZEN 2012 (blue edition) software (Zeiss, version 3.3), ImageJ (Fiji), Microsoft PowerPoint (2016) and for 3 dimensional (3D) image analysis and co-localization analysis the IMARIS software (version 9.1.2, Bitplane) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Brightfield and Confocal Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brightfield images were obtained using an EPI-SCOPE1 (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a 10x objective. Image processing, such as stitching of low magnification photographs, was done with the ZEN 2012 Blue edition software (Carl Zeiss). Fluorescent images were taken using a LSM700 Zeiss confocal microscope with a 20x Plan-Apochromat objective. Stack images were collected by sequential scanning and maximum intensity projections of acquired z-stacks was done in ImageJ. Image analyses were performed in a blinded manner using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing AtVCCN-GFP in Protoplasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protoplasts were prepared using the Tape-Arabidopsis Sandwich procedure from leaves of transgenic plants (T2 generation) expressing AtVCCN-GFP40 (link). Protoplasts were mounted in W1 solution (0.5 M mannitol, 20 mM KCl, 4 mM MES-KOH, pH 5.7) and observed using a LSM 700 inverted Axio Observer Z1 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) equipped with a LD C-Apochromat water immersion objective lens (× 40/1.1 NA). GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence were both excited at 488 nm and emitted signals were collected above 640 nm for chlorophyll fluorescence (long-pass filter) and below 548 nm for GFP fluorescence (variable secondary dichroic beamsplitter). Images were analysed with Zen 2012 blue edition software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescent Visualization of Osteoclast Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effects of the different inhibitor treatments on osteoclast differentiation on bovine bone slices were studied by fluorescent staining of nuclei and F-actin rings. First, osteoclasts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.01% Tween-20 in PBS on ice for 5 min, and non-specific binding was blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min. Cells were stained with STAR635 phalloidin (Abberior GmbH, Gottingen, Germany; catalogue number 2-0205-002-5) in 1:100 dilution to visualize F-actin and with Hoechst 33342 at a 1:10000 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS to visualize the nuclei, both for 1 h at room temperature. Glass coverslips were embedded with 30% glycerol in PBS and imaged with Carl Zeiss Axioimager microscope and Carl Zeiss Zen 2012 (blue edition) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bacterial Viability Assay using LIVE/DEAD BacLight

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate if cell membranes of non-culturable bacteria remained intact after exposure to the respective antimicrobial treatment, we used the LIVE/DEADTMBacLightTM bacterial viability kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, United States). Therefore, 100 μl of the bacterial sample was removed from the respective wells, centrifuged at 8,000 ×g for 5 min, washed with PBS twice, and diluted 1:100. Then 1.5 μl of SYTO 9 dye and 1.5 μl of propidium iodide were added to the sample, followed by vortexing and 15 min incubation in the dark. After incubation, cells were trapped with a 0.2-μm polycarbonate membrane filter (Sterlitech, Kent, WA, United States), which were subsequently placed between a slide and a coverslip and used for fluorescence microscopy. Viable cells with intact membranes will appear green by fluorescent SYTO 9, which permeates intact or damaged plasma membrane, while propidium iodide can only permeate damaged and disrupted plasma membranes and competes with SYTO 9 for DNA-binding sites. Therefore, cells with intact membranes show green fluorescence while cells with damaged membranes appear with red fluorescence. Those were considered to be dead. Pictures were taken with the Zeiss Observer Z1 inverted widefield microscope and ZEN 2012 (blue edition) software (Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of YAP in Bovine Ovaries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation, bovine ovaries were selected as described above. Entire ovaries were then fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution for 24 h, rinsed, and dehydrated in alcohol until they were embedded in paraffin. Serial sections were prepared (at a thickness of 3 µm), followed by deparaffinization, rehydration, sodium citrate heat-mediated antigen retrieval, peroxidase block, and protein blocking (10% goat for 30 min), and then slides were probed with primary antibody against total and phosphorylated forms of YAP (Table 1) overnight at 4 °C. Protein detection was then performed with the Vectastain Elite ABC HRP Kit (VECTPK6101, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and stained with the DAB substrate kit (VECTSK4100, Vector Laboratories). Slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin and dehydrated with graded alcohols prior to mounting. Negative controls were included in the IHC analysis and consisted of slides for which the primary antibodies (for both total and phosphorylated YAP) were omitted. The results confirmed the specificity of our second antibody (not shown). Photomicrographs were taken using a Carl Zeiss Axio Imager M1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Toronto, ON, Canada) at ×1000 magnification and using the Zen 2012 blue edition software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Cerebellar Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired on an LSM 900 confocal microscope equipped with an Airyscan 2 detector and Zen 2012 (blue edition) software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Göttingen, Germany). For morphometric evaluation of MOG labeling, images of 3–4 individual lobules within the cerebellar cortex of each OSC, and from two OSCs per animal, were evaluated, after background subtraction, by calculating the percentage of immunopositive areas in frames of 350 × 350 μm using ImageJ Software (Fiji, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland). The numbers of IBA-1 and ARG-1 immunopositive cells within the white matter and the internal granular cell layer of a cerebellar lobule were quantified in 3–4 lobules per OSC and from two OSCs per animal, using the bioimaging analysis platform QuPath (Bankhead et al., 2017 (link)), in which cells were segmented and subsequently classified. The cell segmentation model was trained under visual control on a set of five images per condition using the deep learning-based StarDist library (Schmidt et al., 2018 ).
Immunopositive cells in OPC cultures were counted at 20x magnification using an Olympus BX41 fluorescence microscope and cellSens software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Jejunum Histomorphometry in Poultry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 21 and 35 days of age, two birds from each replicate were randomly dissected to collect small intestinal samples. The middle of jejunum samples was sectioned horizontally in 2 cm lengths [14 ]. All samples were fixed in 10% formalin. After fixation, the samples were dehydrated by increasing the concentration of alcohol and embedded in paraffin. Embedded tissue samples were sectioned at a 5 mm thickness using an auto-microtome (Leica RM 2155, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Nussloch, Germany). The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The villus height and crypt depth were determined in cross-section using Axiolab inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Hamburg, Germany) equipped with an HBO 50 camera to capture images and subsequently analyzed using Zen 2012 (blue edition) software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The measurements were examined on 10 villi and 10 crypts for each segment. The villus height-to-crypt depth ratios were then calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!