The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Supor membrane

Manufactured by Avantor
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Supor membrane is a filtration material composed of polyethersulfone (PES) polymer. It is designed to provide high flow rates and excellent particle retention capabilities for a variety of laboratory and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using supor membrane

1

Methanol-based Metabolite Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction protocol used was taken from Bell et al. (2015) (link). Briefly, two experimental replicates of each biological rep (n = 6) were prepared as follows: 40 mg of ground powder was heated in a dry-block at 75°C for 5 min; 1 mL of preheated 70% (v/v) methanol (70°C) was then added to each sample and placed in a water bath for 20 min at 70°C. Samples were centrifuged for 5 min (12,000 rpm, 20°C) to collect loose material into a pellet. The supernatant was then filtered using 0.22 μm Acrodisc syringe filters with Supor membrane (hydrophilic polyethersulfone; VWR, Lutterworth, United Kingdom) into fresh Eppendorf tubes. Samples were frozen at −80°C until analysis by LC–MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction of Turnip Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction method was adapted from [20 (link)]. Three replicates of each batch were prepared as follows: 40 mg of ground steamed-pureed turnip powder was heated in a dry-block at 75 °C for 2 min to ensure inactivation of any remaining active myrosinase enzyme. Preheated 70% (v/v) methanol (1.2 mL; 70 °C) was added and the sample placed in a water bath for 20 min at 70 °C. Samples were then centrifuged for 10 min (10,000 rpm, 18 °C) to collect loose material into a pellet. The supernatant was then filtered through 0.22 μm Acrodisc syringe filters with Supor membrane (hydrophilic polyethersulfone; VWR, Lutterworth, UK) and frozen (−80 °C) in Eppendorf tubes until analysis by LC-MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying 3-Hydroxypropionic Acid Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each strain, at least sixteen single colonies originating from independent transformants were inoculated in 0.5 mL drop-out liquid medium without uracil, histidine, and leucine in a 96 deep-well plate with air-penetrable lid (EnzyScreen, NL). Plates were incubated at 30°C with 300 rpm agitation at 5.1 cm orbit cast overnight (Eppendorf innova 44). 20 μL of the overnight cultures were used to inoculate synthetic fed-batch medium (Feed-In-Time fed-batch medium, m2p-Labs) in a 96 deep-well plate. Fermentation was carried out for 72 hours at the same conditions as above.
At the end of the cultivation OD600 was measured using the microtiter plate reader BioTek Synergy MX (BioTek). The culture broth was filtered (Acroprep 0.2 μm, Supor membrane, VWR) and the supernatant analyzed for 3-hydroxypropionic acid concentration on HPLC. For measuring 3HP on HPLC, 30 μL of the sample was analyzed for 30 min using an Aminex HPX-87H ion exclusion column with a 1 mM H2SO4 flow of 0.6 mL.min-1. The temperature of the column was 60°C. The refractive index at 45°C and the UV absorption at 210 nm were recorded. 3HP quantification was performed based on RI chromatograms. The UV spectrum was recorded with a diode array and the identity of 3-hydroxypropionic acid was additionally verified by comparison with the spectrum of a commercial standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Glucosinolate Extraction and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glucosinolates were extracted and analysed according to the protocol in Bell et al. (2015) (link) with the following alterations: Extracts were filtered with 0.22 μm Arcrodisc syringe filters with Supor membrane (hydrophilic polyethersulfone; VWR, Lutterworth, UK) after extraction. Analysis was performed using an Agilent 1200 Series LC system (Agilent, Stockport, UK) equipped with a variable wavelength detector (GSLs quantified at 229 nm), and coupled with a Bruker HCT ion trap (Bruker, Coventry, UK). A Gemini 3 μm C18 110 Å (150 × 4.6 mm) column was utilised (with Security Guard column, C18; 4 mm × 3 mm; Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK), and separation was optimised for use with the Bell et al. (2015) (link) isocratic gradient, at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. A six point sinigrin hydrate calibration curve was prepared (r2 = 0.977, y = 7.763; Jin et al., 2009 (link)). Compounds were identified using literature ion data and characteristic ion fragments (Table 1). Quantification was performed using Bruker Daltonics HyStar software (Bruker) with relative response factors (Clarke, 2010 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!