The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tsq quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan

The TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer is a high-performance analytical instrument used for the detection and quantification of various chemical compounds. It features a triple quadrupole configuration, which allows for the selective and sensitive analysis of target analytes in complex sample matrices.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using tsq quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

1

Plasma Xanthine Oxidoreductase Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma XOR activity was measured using frozen samples that were maintained at −80 °C until the time of assay and was measured using the recently established assay using stable isotope-labelled [13C2,15N2] xanthine with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (Nano Space SI-2 LC system, Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) and a TSQ-Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Bremen, Germany) [17 (link),18 (link)]. The calibration curve of [13C2,15N2] UA showed linearity over the range of 4–4000 nM (r2 > 0.995) with a lower limit of quantitation of 4 nM. The lower detection limit of XOR activity was 6.67 pmol/h/mL plasma, and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of human plasma XOR activity were 6.5% and 9.1%, respectively [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Fentanyl and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fentanyl, acetylfentanyl and their metabolites in the culture medium were tentatively quantified as reported previously [7 (link)]. Briefly, a 25 µL sample of the culture medium was treated with β-glucuronidase/aryl sulfatase as described above. Ten microliters of internal standard (IS) solution (50 ng of cis-3-methylfentanyl hydrochloride dissolved in 10 µL of water) was added to the reaction mixture, and then it was deproteinized with 0.25 mL of acetonitrile. After centrifugation (10,000 × g for 5 min), a portion of the supernatant was diluted five times with 0.1% formic acid. This sample was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min, and then the supernatant was analyzed by LC/MS. The conditions of analysis were as follows: apparatus, a NANOSPACE SI-2 LC system (Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific); column, mobile phase composition, flow rate, and MS interface were the same as for the identification of the metabolites; analysis mode, selected reaction monitoring (SRM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Redox Homeostasis in Candida albicans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

C. albicans cells were harvested [82 (link)] and protein extracts prepared in 0.5 M citrate, pH 5.0) as GSNO was found to be unstable at pH 8.0. For GSNO assays, 5 μL of 1 mM NADH and 10 μL of 250 μM GSNO were added to 10 μL of protein extract, and samples were derivatized at 0, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min. For GSSG assays, 5 μL of 1 mM NADPH and 10 μL of 250 μM GSSG were added to 10 μL of protein extract, and samples were derivatized at 0, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min. The derivatization and analysis were performed as previously described [93 (link)] using a Thermo Surveyor LC system coupled to a TSQ Quantum, triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, UK). The following SRM transitions were used for quantification; Glu-Glu (internal standard) m/z 277–241, GSNO m/z 337–307, GSNEM m/z 433–304 and GSSG m/z 613–355. Peak integration and quantification was performed using Xcalibur software (Version 2.0.7.SP2). GSH, GSSG and GSNO concentrations were then calculated relative to authentic standards. Data were normalised against total protein. Data represent the means and standard deviations from at least three independent experiments.
The redox potential was calculated using the GSH and GSSG concentrations calculated using the following equation based on the Nernst equation [20 (link)].
(30°C, pH 7.4)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Finnigan TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was connected to a Surveyor HPLC via ESI interface (ThermoFisher). High purity nitrogen was used as the sheath and auxiliary gas; Ultra-high purity argon was used as the collision gas (1.5 mTorr). Q1 and Q3 quadrupoles were set at unit resolution. Samples were separated on a Waters XTerra MS-C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm) protected with an XTerra MS-C18 guard column (3.9 × 20 mm, 5 μm). The column temperature was 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile containing 2% (v/v) methanol (A) and water containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (B). A linear gradient elution program was used as follows: 0 min, 5% A; 8 min, 25% A; 12 min, 25% A; 15 min, 40% A; 23 min, 80% A; 25 min, 95% A; 30 min, 95% A. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. An aliquot of 5 μL was injected for analysis. UV spectra were obtained by scanning from 200 to 400 nm. The mass spectrometer was operated in the (+)-ESI mode. The optimized parameters were as follows: sheath gas (N2), 50 arb; auxiliary gas (N2), 5 arb; spray voltage, 4.0 kV; capillary temperature, 330°C; collision energy, see Table S1. Analytes were detected in the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. Data were processed by Xcalibur 2.0.7 software (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sphingomyelin Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endogenous sphingomyelin molecular species were performed on a Thermo-Fisher TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operating in a Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) positive ionization mode, as described previously [24 (link),25 (link)]. Total cells, fortified with internal standards, were extracted with ethyl acetate/iso-propanol/water (60/30/10 v/v), evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in 100 μl of methanol. The reconstituted samples were injected on the Surveyor/TSQ Quantum LC/MS system and gradient eluted from the BDS Hypersil C8 column (150 × 3.2 mm, 3 μm particle size) with 1.0 mM methanolic ammonium formate/2 mM aqueous ammonium formate mobile phase system. The peaks for the target analytes and internal standards were collected and processed using the Xcalibur software. Calibration curves were constructed by plotting peak area ratios of synthetic standards, representing each target analyte, to the corresponding internal standard. The target analyte peak area ratios from the samples were similarly normalized to their respective internal standards and compared with the calibration curves using a linear regression model. The levels of sphingolipids of samples were normalized against cellular protein, and expressed as pmol/μg protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Biological Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC/ESI-MS/MS experiments were performed on TSQ Quantum Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, United States) equipped with an electrospray ionization interface. This instrument was coupled to Dionex 3000 (Dionex, United States) ULPC system. Data acquisition and processing were accomplished using Xcalibur data collection and integration software. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile with an addition of 0.1% formic acid (Solvent A) and water with an addition of 0.1% formic acid (Solvent B) was set at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min in gradient elution. Sample preparations were carried out by precipitation procedure using acetonitrile after the addition of the internal standard [IS, 2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-4-phenylquinazoline]. The dried residue was reconstituted in the mobile phase and injected onto an Acclaim Polar Advantage Column (1.8 μm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm, Dionex).
The method was validated according to validation procedures, parameters and acceptance criteria based on USP XXIII guidelines and FDA criterion 20/15.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Triple quadrupole MS protocol for HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Finnigan TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was connected to the HPLC via ESI interface (ThermoFisher, CA, USA). The mass spectrometer was operated in the negative and positive ion modes. High purity nitrogen was used as the sheath and auxiliary gas; high purity argon was used as the collision gas (1.5 mTorr). Q1 and Q3 quadrupoles were set at unit resolution. Tune parameters and NL/PRE ions were described in Table 5S.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Glutathione Redox Potential Quantification in Candida albicans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glutathione (GSH) and glutathione disulphide (GSSG) levels were assayed by LC-MS/MS by adapting previously described procedures [71 (link)]. Briefly, mid-exponential C. albicans cells (above) were harvested at the specified time points, and proteins extracted in 0.5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris.HCl, pH 8.0. The extracts were then derivatised for 60 min at room temperature and then subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis [71 (link)] with a Thermo Surveyor LC system coupled to a TSQ Quantum, triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK). The 150 x 2.0 mm Stability 100 BS-C17 column (Hichrom, Reading, UK) was run at 45°C with 50% 15 mM ammonium acetate, pH 2.4 and 50% methanol at flow rates of 200 μl/minute. Total run times were 4 minutes. Electrospray ionisation was performed in positive ion mode with single reaction monitoring (SRM) of parent ions glu-glu (m/z 277—m/z 241), GSH-NEM (m/z 433—m/z 304) and GSSG (m/z 613—m/z 355). Quantification of GSH and GSSG concentrations was performed relative to calibration curves using Xcalibur software (Version 2.0.7.SP2), and the technical errors were less than 10%. The redox potential (ΔE) was calculated for cells at 30°C and pH 7.4 using the following equation [59 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bile Acids Quantification by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bile acids from tissue and fecal extracts were injected in volumes of 5 μL and gradient eluted onto a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (3.2 × 8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) Ascentis Express HPLC C18 column (25 cm × 2.1 mm, 5 μm particle size, Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Mobile phase A consisted of H2O with 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Bile acids were eluted on a linear gradient of 20%–60% B for 15 minutes, followed by 60%–100% B for 15 minutes, and 100%–20% B for 30 minutes at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. All analytes were measured on a TSQ Quantum Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with an identity transition. Optimal collision energies were determined empirically before each experiment. Quantification was determined using a calibration curve from 5 μL injections of 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 μM bile acid standards using Xcaliber Quant Browser (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bile Acids Quantification by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bile acids from tissue and fecal extracts were injected in volumes of 5 μL and gradient eluted onto a SecurityGuard C18 guard column (3.2 × 8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) Ascentis Express HPLC C18 column (25 cm × 2.1 mm, 5 μm particle size, Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Mobile phase A consisted of H2O with 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Bile acids were eluted on a linear gradient of 20%–60% B for 15 minutes, followed by 60%–100% B for 15 minutes, and 100%–20% B for 30 minutes at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. All analytes were measured on a TSQ Quantum Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with an identity transition. Optimal collision energies were determined empirically before each experiment. Quantification was determined using a calibration curve from 5 μL injections of 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 μM bile acid standards using Xcaliber Quant Browser (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!