The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

C18 reversed phase analytical column

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The C18 reversed-phase analytical column is a common laboratory equipment used for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) separations. It is designed to separate and analyze a wide range of organic compounds, including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and environmental contaminants. The column features a hydrophobic C18 stationary phase that interacts with the analytes based on their polarity, allowing for efficient separation and purification of complex mixtures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using c18 reversed phase analytical column

1

Peptide Separation and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were separated on C18 cartridges and then concentrated and dried by vacuum centrifugation. The peptide content was accessed by UV light spectral density at 280 nm. LC-MS/MS analysis was conducted on a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Easy nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific); 2 μg of the peptide was loaded on the C18 reversed-phase analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific). MS data were acquired by up to 20 data-dependent methods with higher energy collision dissociation. The ions with a charge state between 2 and 6 and a minimum intensity of 2e3 were qualified for fragmentation. Dynamic exclusion time was set as 30 s. The normalized collision energy was 27 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Labeled Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractions were analyzed using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Santa Clara, California, USA) was used for LC–MS/MS analysis of labeled peptides, which was coupled with Easy nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 90 min. The labeled peptides were then transferred to a reversed-phase trap column (Thermo Scientific), and a C18 reversed-phase analytical column (Thermo Scientific) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid) with a linear gradient separation in buffer B (84% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. Peptide identification mode was enabled, using a data-dependent top-10 method to acquire mass spectrometry data, selecting the most abundant precursor ions from the survey scan (300–1800 m/z) followed by HCD fragmentation. The resolution of the HCD spectra was set to 17,500 at m/z 200 and the isolation width was 2 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis Using Q Exactive Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methods of sample preparation for proteomic analysis were reported in Supplementary data. The prepared samples were performed on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer that was coupled to Easy nanoLC (Thermo Scientific, USA). Samples were loaded onto a reverse-phase trap column (Thermo Scientific, USA) connected to the C18-reversed-phase analytical column (Thermo Scientific, USA) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid) and separated with a linear gradient of buffer B (84% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid). The MS data were analyzed using MaxQuant software version 1.3.0.5 (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany). The cutoff of global false discovery rate (FDR) for peptide and protein identification was set to 0.01. Label-free quantification was carried out in MaxQuant. Protein abundance was calculated on the basis of the normalized spectral protein intensity. The mass spectrometry results were forwarded to statistical analysis. The detailed methods of proteomic profiling were illustrated in Supplementary data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phosphorylated Peptide Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphorylated peptide samples were injected onto a reverse phase trap column (Thermo Scientific) connected with a C18-reversed phase analytical column (Thermo Scientific). The mobile phase buffers were Buffer A (0.1% Formic acid) and Buffer B (84% acetonitrile and 0.1% Formic acid) with a gradient of: 0–35% mobile Phase B from 0–50 min, 35–100% mobile Phase B from 50–55 min, and 100% mobile Phase B from 55–60 min.
The LC-MS/MS experiment was conducted on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled with Easy nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Positive ion mode was selected. MS data were acquired using the data-dependent top 10 method. The most abundant precursor ions from the survey scan (300–1800 m/z) were dynamically selected for HCD fragmentation. The AGC target was set to 3e6 and the maximum injection time was set to 10 ms. Forty seconds was selected as the dynamic exclusion duration. A measurement scan was obtained at m/z 200 with a resolution of 70,000, and the resolution of the HCD spectrum was set to 17,500 at m/z 200, and the isolation width was set to 2 m/z. 30 eV was set as the normalized collision energy. The underfill rate was stated as 0.1%. The instrument was run in peptide recognition mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-pH Reversed-Phase Fractionation and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMT-labelled peptides were fractionated into 10 fractions through an incremental acetonitrile step-gradient elution according to the instructions of the Pierce high pH reversed-phase fractionation kit (Thermo scientific, United States). Each fraction was injected for nano liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis performed on an EASY nLC and Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo scientific, United States). Formic acid in 0.1% aqueous solution was used as buffer A, and 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile aqueous solution (84% acetonitrile) was used as buffer B. The samples were separated on a trap column (Thermo, 100 μm × 2 cm) connected to a C18 reversed-phase analytical column (Thermo, 75 μm × 10 cm). The flow rate was 300 nl/min. The liquid phase gradient was set as follows: 0–55% buffer B for 80 min, 55–100% buffer B for 5 min, and 100% buffer B for 5 min. On-line mass spectrometry analysis was performed by a Q Exactive mass spectrometer in positive ion mode. The normalized collision energy was 30 eV. The scanning range was 300–1800 m/z. The automatic gain control target was set to 3e6, and the maximum injection time was set to 10 milliseconds. The dynamic exclusion time was 40.0 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Workflow for Peptide Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein solution was firstly digested into a peptide mixture with protease (Ragelle et al., 2017 (link)). Then, LC-MS/MS was performed using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer coupled with an Easy nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The peptide sample was loaded onto the C18-reversed phase analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid in HPLC grade water), and separated with a linear gradient of buffer B (80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) with a flow rate at 300 nL/min. The linear chromatographic gradient was achieved with linear increase of buffer B percentage. After that, the peptide entered into the Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The MS analysis was set for 60 min in a positive ion mode. MS data was acquired using a data-dependent top10 method dynamically choosing the most abundant precursor ions from the full scan (350–1,800 m/z) for HCD fragmentation. The raw data obtained was then imported into Proteome Discoverer 2.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) for protein identification, then embedded Mascot 2.6 engines was used for database searches. Protein identification was performed using reviewed database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS measurements were carried out using a liquid chromatography Thermo Scientific/ Dionex Ultimate 3000 system equipped with C18 reversed-phase analytical column (2.6 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, Thermo-Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The LC method employed a binary gradient of acetonitrile and water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. Separation was achieved with a gradient of 7–60% of acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min for 42 min. This UHPLC system was coupled to a hybrid QTOF mass spectrometer (Impact HD, Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). The ions were generated by electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive mode. MS/MS fragmentation mass spectra were produced by collisions (CID, collision-induced dissociation) with nitrogen gas in the Q2 section of the spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Throughput Peptide Separation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was separated by HPLC liquid phase system EasynLC with nano-liter flow rate. The peptides were loaded onto a reverse phase trap column (100 μm × 2 cm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), connected to the C18-reversed phase analytical column (length: 10 cm, inner diameter: 75 μm) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid), and then separated with a linear gradient of buffer B (84% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min controlled by IntelliFlow technology (Cholewa et al., 2014 (link)). After chromatographic separation, the samples were analyzed by Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The mass spectrometer was operated in the form of positive ions, with the scan range of the precursor ion 300 to 1,800 m/z and the related parameters as follow: automatic gain control target: 3e6, the maximum inject time: 10 ms, dynamic exclusion duration: 40.0 s, resolution of survey scans: 70,000 at m/z 200, resolution for HCD spectra: 17,500 at m/z 200, isolation width: 2 m/z, normalized collision energy: 30 eV, and underfelt ratio (specifies the minimum percentage of the target value likely to be reached at maximum fill time) of 0.1%. The peptide recognition mode of the instrument was selected, and 20 fragments was collected after each full scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High pH Reverse-Phase HPLC Peptide Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using a Thermo Betasil C18 column (5 μm particles, 10 mm ID, 250 mm length), peptides were fractionated via high pH reverse-phase HPLC. Briefly, 8% to 32% acetonitrile was used to gradient separate the peptides over 60 min and divide them into 60 fractions. Then, we combined the peptides into six fractions and dried them by vacuum centrifuge. The peptides were combined in 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and directly loaded onto a reversed-phase C18 analytical column (Thermo Scientific, 15 cm length, 75 μm i.d., Waltham, MA, USA). The gradient included solvent B (0.1% formic acid, 98% acetonitrile) from 6% to 80% for 40 min, and the flow rate of EASY-nLC 1000 UPLC system was 400 nL/min.
Proteomics based on LC-MS/MS was performed by PTM BioLab Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) as described previously [17 (link)]. In a Q Exactive TM Plus connected online to the UPLC, the peptides were submitted to an NSI source followed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). With an NCE setting of 28, peptides were chosen for MS/MS analysis, and fragments were found in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 17,500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Equilibrium Solubility of Valsartan Solid Dispersions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the effects of the prepared solid dispersions on the solubility of VPN, the equilibrium solubility was determined as previously reported.6 (link) An excess amount of either pure drug or the prepared solid dispersions was added to screw-capped vials containing 10 mL of distilled water. The vials were placed in a thermostatically controlled shaking water bath (Model 1031; GFL Corporation, Burgwedel, Germany) at 25°C±0.5°C for 48 hours. Samples from the vials were taken and analyzed for VPN concentrations every day until equilibrium was reached (the drug solubility values on two consecutive days did not vary by more than 5%). Aliquots withdrawn were filtered through a 0.22 µm pore size Millipore filter and assayed for drug content using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method mentioned earlier by Ding et al,36 except for slight modifications. An isocratic HPLC method was performed using Agilent 1200 series equipped with UV diode array detector. Reversed phase C18 analytical column (4×250 mm, 5 µm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used. The mobile phase composed of a mixture of methanol and 0.05 ammonium acetate buffer of pH 5.5, 80:20 (v/v). The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1 mL/min, the injection volume was 20 µL, and the detection wavelength was 273 nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!