The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Titanium curettes

Manufactured by Hu-Friedy
Sourced in United States

Titanium curettes are a type of dental instrument designed for scaling and root planing procedures. They feature a durable titanium construction and are available in various shapes and sizes to accommodate different clinical needs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using titanium curettes

1

Peri-implant and Periodontal Treatment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peri-apical radiographs were obtained using the parallel technique, and the peri-implant bone levels were evaluated. Patients received a full mouth examination one week after supragingival scaling. Periodontal parameters, including pocket probing depth (PPD), bleeding index (BI) (Mazza et al., 1981 (link)), and plaque index (PLI) (Silness and Loe, 1964 (link)), were recorded at all six sites (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual, and disto-lingual) for each tooth. All clinical examinations were performed by the same clinician, and the treatment procedure was performed by another clinician.
Before treatment, oral hygiene instructions were provided to improve the plaque control. Under appropriate anesthesia, debridement with titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) and irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine were performed for the diseased peri-implant sites. For periodontitis sites, scaling and root planing using an ultrasonic device and a metal curette (Gracey curette, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) were performed before peri-implant mechanical debridement. A re-examination was performed eight weeks after the treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peri-Implantitis Surgical Treatment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surgical peri-implantitis treatment was performed using local anaesthetics. After performing an incision ≥1 mm apical of the mucosal margin, in order to better facilitate the removal of the inflamed soft tissue collar and create pocket reduction, a full-thickness flap was raised buccally and lingually, and the implant surface was exposed. Granulation tissue was removed using titanium curettes (Hu Friedy®, Chicago, IL, USA). Calculus, if present, was carefully removed with a scaler tip. The implant surface was cleaned using an air-polishing device with erythritol-based powder and hand instruments combined with gauzes soaked in saline solution until the implant surface was deemed to be clean by the surgeon. After repositioning the mucosal flap with single interrupted sutures, the patient was given postoperative instructions. Patients were instructed to use an antiseptic mouthwash (0.2% chlorhexidine, Orasol®, ICM Pharma Pte. Ltd., Singapore) for 2 weeks after surgery, two times daily. Two weeks after surgery, the sutures were removed, and further oral hygiene instructions were given (twice daily use of an electric toothbrush and use of interdental brushes). The patients were recalled 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the treatment for a re-examination and peri-implant maintenance therapy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Implant Pocket Debridement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An unblinded centre‐specific operator (IP, AL, and GB) performed a full‐mouth supra‐marginal and supra‐gingival instrumentation in both groups using ultrasonic and hand instruments, followed by the use of rubber cups and polishing paste. In the same appointment, only patients of the control group also received a complete non‐surgical sub‐marginal instrumentation of the study implants under local anaesthesia. In brief, after removing the screw‐retained supra‐constructions, overdentures, and, when possible, cement‐retained implant restorations, the study implants and their restorations underwent a deep sub‐marginal instrumentation by means of titanium curettes (Hu‐Friedy, Chicago, IL), followed by three irrigations of the peri‐implant pockets with a solution of 0.12% chlorhexidine + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (DentAid, Barcelona, Spain), and the sub‐marginal application of the same active principles in gel formulation (DentAid), before reconnecting the removed restorations. Thereafter, implants of the control group received surgical therapy 6 weeks after supra‐ and sub‐marginal instrumentation, while the ones of the test group received the surgical therapy 2 weeks after the supra‐marginal instrumentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surgical Decontamination and Titanium Grafting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A non-submerged surgical technique was used for both test and control sites.
Following administration of local anaesthesia flap elevation procedure included an intra-crevicular incision around the implant. Full thickness mucoperiosteal flaps were raised on the buccal and lingual aspect to gain access to the complete peri-implant defect and to the implant surface. The size of the flap was determined by supracrestal incisions extending mesial and distal of the implant site. Vertical incisions into the vestibule at a distance of at least one tooth/implant from the implant were performed as necessary for adequate access. Granulation tissue was removed using titanium curettes (HuFriedy®, Chicago, IL, USA) and the exposed implant surfaces were cleaned mechanically by using a rotary titanium brush (Tigran PeriBrush™, Tigran Technologies, Malmö, Sweden) and decontaminated chemically with 3% H 2 O 2 for 1 minute followed by rinsing with saline for 60 seconds (2 x 20 ml).
Following treatment allocation in accordance to randomization, titanium granules (Tigran™, Tigran Technologies, Malmö, Sweden) were applied into the intraosseous defects of the test sites. After insertion of the granules, excess material was carefully removed. Flaps were then repositioned and sutured back into position using
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!