The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Denmark, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Australia, Israel

Stata is a general-purpose statistical software package that provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, management, and visualization. It offers a wide range of statistical methods, including regression analysis, time series analysis, and multilevel modeling, among others. Stata is designed to facilitate the analysis of complex data sets and support the entire research process, from data import to report generation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 799 protocols using stata

1

Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of circRNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using Meta-DiSc (version 1.4; https://meta-disc.software.informer.com/1.4) and Stata (version
16; Stata.com/Stata16/">https://www.Stata.com/Stata16/) statistical software. Cochran’s
Q test and I2 statistics were applied to test the
heterogeneity to assess whether eligible study data could be integrated.15
Heterogeneity was considered statistically significant when
P < 0.05. I2 ≤ 25% and
P > 0.1 was considered to indicate no statistical
heterogeneity, in which case, data were analysed with a fixed-effects model;
otherwise, a random-effects model was applied. The following indicators of
circRNAs were measured: sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio
(LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and area
under the summary ROC curve.16 (link)
Effective sample size-based funnel plots and associated regression tests
of asymmetry were used to determine the presence of potential publication bias.17 (link)
Sensitivity, goodness-of-fit, bivariate normality, and outliers were
determined using the Stata software, version 16. Subgroup analysis was conducted
using Meta-DiSc software, version 1.4. Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test was
used for quantitative analysis of all publication biases using Stata software,
version 16. An asymmetric distribution indicated the existence of a publication
bias.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Predicting Candidemia Risk in ICU Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using the Stata software (v15.1; College Station, TX, USA). Factors associated with candidemia and mortality were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression models. A backward stepwise logistic regression was used to select variables entered in the multivariate models, using a cutoff p value of 0.10. New scores to predict the risk of candidemia were developed for patients in and outside the ICU. Scores were obtained by rounding the β-coefficients. Receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn using rocreg implemented in Stata®, after adjustment for matching covariates [32 (link)]. Test efficiencies were calculated using the dtroc softwares (Stata®). The best cutoff point was established according to standard methods (Youdden’s approach to determine the cutoff with the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity; the method of Zweig and Campbell, maximizing efficiency) [33 (link), 34 (link)] by using cutpt (Stata®).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Robust statistical analysis of zFACE measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A minimum of 28 images were analyzed per stage/condition to provide adequate power for statistical comparison. For statistical analysis of each zFACE measurement, the GraphPad Prism analysis function was used to run one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni correction for 39 tests was applied, and P<0.00128 was considered significant.
Multivariate analysis of the zFACE measurements was performed in Stata (StataCorp) and GraphPad Prism. Data were standardized and PCA was performed. Multiple models were run to thoroughly identify/evaluate the most robust model in Stata, in which data were rotated and PC loadings could be calculated. Once modeling was determined in Stata, a rapid and streamlined analysis was rerun in GraphPad Prism, producing similar results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of Non-Pharmacological OAB Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pairwise meta‐analysis. Pairwise meta‐analysis for direct comparisons will be conducted by STATA. Given that our outcomes are continuous data, the effect size of the non‐pharmacological interventions will assess with the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity across studies will be evaluated with P and I2 statistics. If the p‐value is ≥0.1 and I2 ≤50%, a fixed model will be synthesized. If not, the random‐effects model will be used. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis will be carried out if it is necessary.
Network meta‐analysis. Bayesian network meta‐analysis will be used in our study. All data will be analysed by Open BUGS, R and STATA. Node splitting analysis by R is used to estimate the appropriateness of the model. STATA will be designed for surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) and league figure to rank the non‐pharmacological interventions in OAB after SMD or OR calculated by Open BUGS. Direct and pooled I2 will be assessed by R. Potential publication bias will also be evaluated through funnel plots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Public Transport Use and SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because of the small losses to follow-up and the low percentage of SARS-CoV-2 infected [10 , 11 ], cumulative incidence was used. The association between the use of public transport before and after the initial lockdown period and subsequent contraction of SARS-CoV-2 was investigated using logistic regression. All individuals who had not contracted SARS-CoV-2 by January 27, 2021, were included as controls. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for age, calendar time, gender, municipality, smoking habits, income level, fitness and underlying medical conditions. Trend test was performed by fitting ordinal values corresponding to exposure categories and testing whether the slope coefficient differed from zero. All analyses were performed using Stata (Stata Statistical Software, release 16, Stata Corp., College Station, TX) and R (version 3.6.2). A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses were performed in health care workers and in non-health care workers, and by sex.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Micronutrients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Risk ratios/relative risks (RRs) of adverse pregnancy outcomes by multiple micronutrient supplementation were analyzed using logistic regression. Potential confounding of significant associations by dietary intakes were investigated by adjusting these models for food frequency intakes. Continuous variables were analyzed in statistical models using linear regression, adjusted for confounders where appropriate. Where the dependent variable residuals were skewed, the models were analyzed with prior transformation of the data so that the residuals were normally distributed. Other categorical variables were analyzed using a χ2-test, Fisher’s exact test (as appropriate), or logistic regression. RRs were calculated using the Stata binreg function. Missing data were dealt with using case or listwise deletions, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout. The statistical analyses were performed using either Stata (version 13.1; Stata Corp., from Timberlake Consultants Ltd., Richmond, Surrey, UK) or R (version 3.6.1; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Meta-analysis of Time Efficiency Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed pooled studies in a random-effects model using the statistical method of Inverse Variance with Review Manager, and calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was quantified with Review Manager using the I2 statistic; I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% represented low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the statistical method of meta-based Influence Analysis with STATA to assess the general effects after specific studies were omitted. A descriptive statistics analysis of TET, which included normality tests, percentiles distribution and frequency histogram, was conducted with SPSS for dividing groups of studies into “short time”, “medium time” and “long time”. Subgroup analyses of the TET and disease categories (HFrEF and HFpEF) were performed with Review Manager to assess part of potential source of heterogeneity. A funnel plot and contour-enhanced funnel plot were made with STATA to identify publication bias. A two-tailed P value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Review Manager (Version 5.4), SPSS (Version 21.0) and STATA (Version 16.0) were the software used in the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Neonatal Gut Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used Visual Basic 6.0/ASP.net and Oracle 8i to manage the data, with stringent range, consistency, and logical checks. To ensure data quality and accuracy, real time data entry was done using netbook. Data were analyzed separately for the hospital and community births using Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA, SPSS, Version 19.0 for Windows) and Stata (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA, Intercooled Stata 12.0 Version), P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviation) were calculated. We examined the characteristics of newborns and mothers across the allocated groups on a range of variables to determine the degree of balance achieved by the randomization. We analyzed colonization positivity data by intervention groups and follow-up time. Among those that were positive, we further estimated distribution of colony counts by intervention groups and follow-up time. A paired analysis comparing the baseline positivity/colony count of the child with his 2- and 48-hours post intervention positivity/counts was performed to study any group differences as well as changes over follow-up time within group. The chi square, t- test and OR with 95 % CI were used to estimate statistics and significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Myopia Severity Estimation and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The definition of high myopia was spherical equivalent (SE) -6.00 D or less. SE was calculated as sum of sphere and 1/2 cylinder. Quantile regression, a type of regression model estimating conditional quantile functions, was adopted to construct the reference centile curves on the RESC cross-sectional data.
To validate the accuracy of the age-specific severity estimation in predicting high myopia, baseline centiles and refraction at age 15 years of first-born twins were used as test and outcome variables to conduct diagnostic test. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and Mathew’s correlation coefficient (MCC) were calculated. Predictions were made by locating a subject into regions between the quantile curves based on his/her age and SE, to identify if he/she would develop high myopia by the age of 15. All the statistical analysis was performed with Stata (Stata version 12.0, Stata Corp., College Station, TX)[21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Vegetable Purchase Behavior Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Logistic regression with robust standard errors was used to evaluate relationships between metrics on purchase of vegetables in the last 7 days (binary outcome). These results are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Multiple regression with robust standard errors was used for analysis of FE with vegetable purchase diversity, energy intake (kcal), WHR, and BMI. Two sensitivity analyses were conducted: (1) Different buffer sizes for clusters under the dispersion metrics; (2) FE metrics on energy intake adjusted for bodyweight (Kg). Descriptive statistics are presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQR). Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata, visualized in R Studio and Stata, and mapped in Geoda and QGIS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!