16;
Q test and I2 statistics were applied to test the
heterogeneity to assess whether eligible study data could be integrated.15
Heterogeneity was considered statistically significant when
P < 0.05. I2 ≤ 25% and
P > 0.1 was considered to indicate no statistical
heterogeneity, in which case, data were analysed with a fixed-effects model;
otherwise, a random-effects model was applied. The following indicators of
circRNAs were measured: sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio
(LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and area
under the summary ROC curve.16 (link)
Effective sample size-based funnel plots and associated regression tests
of asymmetry were used to determine the presence of potential publication bias.17 (link)
Sensitivity, goodness-of-fit, bivariate normality, and outliers were
determined using the Stata software, version 16. Subgroup analysis was conducted
using Meta-DiSc software, version 1.4. Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test was
used for quantitative analysis of all publication biases using Stata software,
version 16. An asymmetric distribution indicated the existence of a publication
bias.