The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tibco statistica 13.3 pl

Manufactured by StatSoft
Sourced in Poland

TIBCO STATISTICA 13.3 PL is a comprehensive statistical analysis software package. It provides a wide range of statistical and data mining techniques for analyzing data. The software includes tools for data manipulation, visualization, and modeling. TIBCO STATISTICA 13.3 PL is designed to handle large datasets and offers a user-friendly interface.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using tibco statistica 13.3 pl

1

Dietary Supplement Usage Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using TIBCO STATISTICA 13.3 PL (StatSoft, Kraków, Poland). Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare the differences in categorical variables between the subgroups of respondents. After excluding the normality with the Shapiro–Wilk test, the U-Mann Whitney (for two compared groups) or Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s post-hoc test and Bonferroni correction (for more than two compared groups) were used to analyze differences between groups in the year of the studies, perceived level of stress, and the level of knowledge about DS (expressed in linear scale) in subgroups of students. Logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of analyzed features (independent factors) on the of use any DS, DS for stress, anxiety, depression, or sleeping problems, DS other than for those indications, and the use of POM (dependent factors). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Experimental Bladder Injury Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To express experimental data on all figures, means ± standard deviations (SD) were used. Statistical analysis of the effects of the substances on the studied parameters was carried out with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The equality of variances was checked by the Brown–Forsythe test and specific comparisons between studied groups were later performed with Tukey’s post hoc test. In the case of inequality of variance (creatinine, hematuria, and histological urinary bladder score), the Kruskal–Wallis test was used as a post hoc test. Hypotheses were positively verified if p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using TIBCO STATISTICA 13.3 PL (StatSoft, Kraków, Poland). Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!