The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ethyl methanesulfonate ems

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) is a chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It functions as a mutagenic agent, capable of inducing genetic mutations in biological systems. The core purpose of EMS is to facilitate the study of genetic processes and the evaluation of the effects of chemical compounds on genetic material.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using ethyl methanesulfonate ems

1

Genotoxicity Evaluation with EMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, unless differently specified in the text. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Ireland, and used according to manufacturer’s specification. EMS was diluted in cell culture medium and used at a concentration of 15 mM as the genotoxic positive control for experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Subacute In Vivo Genotoxicity Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The subacute combined peripheral blood erythrocyte micronucleus (MN) and alkaline pH>13 comet assay was conducted at Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc. (Durham, NC) (Recio et al. 2010 (link); Witt et al. 2010 (link)). Tissues sampled in the comet assay included forestomach, liver, colon, and blood leukocytes. The MN test measures chromosomal damage in the form of structural and/or numerical changes, while the alkaline comet assay measures primary DNA damage in the form of strand breaks, adducts, and alkali labile sites. Briefly, male B6C3F1/N mice (Charles River Laboratories, Portage, MI, 8–16 wk of age) were exposed to the vehicle control (corn oil), MNA (500, 1000, 1500 or 2000 mg MNA/kg/day), or the positive control (100 mg/kg/day ethyl methanesulfonate, EMS, Sigma-Aldrich) daily for 4 days by oral gavage (N=5). The dose limit for both assays, in the absence of overt toxicity, is 2000 mg/kg/day (OECD 489 2016 ; OECD 2016 ). Four hours after the final treatment with MNA, the mice were euthanized via carbon dioxide asphyxiation. Slides from peripheral blood and bone marrow were immediately prepared, fixed, and stained with acridine orange for MN analysis; tissue samples for the comet assay were collected, processed, flash frozen, and stored in a −80°C freezer until thawed for analysis, as previously described (Recio et al. 2010 (link); Witt et al. 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phytochemical Profiling of Aloe ferox Juice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried Aloe ferox juice was kindly supplied by Erbofrut s.n.c., Roccavione (Italy). The characterization of dried Aloe ferox juice (provided by Indena, SpA, Milan, Italy) is reported in Table 1. Anthraquinones were identified by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography, chromones by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis, and mono- and disaccharides (fructose, galactose, glucose, fructose, lactose, maltose) by using a gas chromatographic method after derivatization. A Karl Fisher system was used to detect water, and total amino acids were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Metals were assayed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, while inorganic and organic anions were assayed by ionic chromatography.

Composition of dried Aloe ferox juice.

Table 1
Antraquinones%Chromones%Other analytes%
Aloin (A+B)8.30Aloesin28.70Glucose0.30
Aloe-emodin0.20Aloeresin32.20Water6.70
Rhein0.03Total amino acids0.55
Emodin0.01Metals0.12
Chrysophanol0.01Inorganic anions0.05
Physcionn.d.Organic ions0.27

The % represents w/w. The sum is 77.44 %.

Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS, Sigma) was used as a positive control and prepared in water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chlorophyll and Mutagen Dose Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2-Amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx, C11H11N5, CAS No. 77500-04-0) was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals; chlorophyll a (C55H72N4O5Mg, CAS No. 479-61-8), chlorophyll b (C55H70MgN4O6, CAS No. 519-62-0), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, CAS No. 67-68-5), ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS; CAS No. 62-50-0) were purchased from Sigma. Chlorophyll a and b were dissolved in DMSO at 0.5% and diluted in distilled water to obtain the test concentrations (0.5, and 1 µM). Mutagen was dissolved in DMSO at 0.5% and diluted in distilled water to obtain the test concentrations (4.69, 9.38 and 23.45 µM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vivo Genotoxicity Assessment of CGTase and Sodium Sulfate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GLP studies were conducted in compliance with OECD TG 474 [19] and in general accordance with OECD TG 489 [20] . Dose range finding studies were conducted to identify appropriate dose levels. Male and female mice were administered CGTase or sodium sulfate via oral gavage up to and including dose levels of 2000 mg/kg/day (test guideline limit dose) for three consecutive days. No marked changes in body weights were measured nor adverse clinical observations found in mice administered either chemical and there were no abnormal gross necropsy organ observations. Therefore, for the definitive studies, male and female B6C3F1 mice (5 animals/dose group) were administered CGTase or sodium sulfate at 1000, 1500, or 2000 mg/kg/day, vehicle (deionized water), or the positive control compound, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 0.9% saline (Ricca Chemical Company, Arlington, TX) at 150 mg/kg/day, daily for three days by oral gavage. Three hours after the final dose, peripheral blood was collected for flow cytometric analysis of MN, and liver, duodenum, and stomach tissues were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at ‐80 °C until analysis by the comet assay [24] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dose-dependent Cytotoxic Effects of Alkylating Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alkylating agents, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) (CAS number 66-27-3), and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) (CAS number 62-50-0) were obtained from Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO, USA, and colchicine (CAS number 64-86-8) was obtained from Himedia, Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. Giemsa stain and other chemicals of analytical grade were commercially available. EMS and MMS were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl to obtain the required concentrations. Freshly prepared solutions of these agents were used each time. The conditioning and challenging doses of EMS (80 and 240 mg/kg body weight) and MMS (50 and 150 mg/kg body weight) were selected from the earlier experiments [28 (link), 29 (link)]. Even though these were selected from treated normal animals, the effect of these along with the range (namely, 25–160 mg/kg body weight of MMS and 50–300 mg/kg body weight of EMS) of doses was analyzed in EAC cells by preliminary pilot toxicity studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Alkaline Comet Assay for DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess SSB, SKOV3, and COV362, cells were exposed to NE at the timepoints required for each experiment: 1 h or 24 h. After NE exposure, the cells were collected and processed to perform the alkaline version of the CometAssay® as described by the manufacturer (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The nuclei were stained with Yoyo-1® and visualized using the EVOS™ M7000 Imaging System (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Fifty nuclei were randomly selected and analyzed for percentage of DNA in tail using the Comet Analysis Software (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a positive control at a concentration of 12 mM for 4 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!