The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chemiluminescent reagent

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

Chemiluminescent reagents are a class of laboratory reagents used for the detection and quantification of target analytes in various biological and chemical assays. These reagents emit light upon a chemical reaction, which can be measured and used to infer the presence and concentration of the target molecule. The core function of chemiluminescent reagents is to provide a sensitive and reliable method for signal detection in various analytical techniques, such as Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and nucleic acid detection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using chemiluminescent reagent

1

Tat-Endophilin A1 Delivery and Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tat-endophilin A1 was synthesized by cloning human endophilin A1 cDNA in a TA vector and Tat-1 expression vector. To visualize and compare the effects of endophilin A1 with and without the Tat-1 expression vector, the expression vector of endophilin A1 was constructed with a polyhistidine tag. Tat-SH3GL2 and Control-SH3GL2 plasmids were amplified and purified proteins were obtained as described previously [17 (link),18 (link)]. Purified proteins were confirmed by Western blot analysis using polyhistidine antibody (1:3000, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) wherein the tagged protein was detected with chemiluminescent reagent as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Amersham, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
Different concentrations of Tat-SH3GL2 and Control-SH3GL2 (0.5 to 5.0 μM) were incubated over a period of time (15 to 60 min) with 3 μM protein to observe the time- and concentration-dependent delivery of protein into HT22 cells. In addition, Tat-SH3GL2 was incubated for 60 h to elucidate the intracellular stability and degradation of Tat-SH3GL2 in HT22 cells. Intracellular delivery was confirmed by Western blot analysis using the specific antibody against the target protein as described previously [17 (link),18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the time of anlaysis, cell lysates were collected in lysis buffer (0.2 ml of 200 mM Tris, pH 8.8, 20% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM DTT, 5% SDS, and 0.02% bromophenol blue) by boiling at 95 °C and shearing through G21 needles (Sterican). Proteins were resolved in polyacrylamide gels and transferred to a polyvinyldifluoride membrane (Amersham). Blocking of unspecific protein-binding sites of the membrane was done with 5% milk powder. Primary antibody incubation was performed at 4 °C, followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-tagged secondary antibody incubation at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized by incubation with chemiluminescent reagent (Amersham) and the Amersham Imager 600.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Nuclear and Cytosolic β-Catenin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells and tissues were lysed with lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Nuclear and cytosolic fractions of β-catenin were separated using nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Blots were hybridized with the appropriate primary IgG, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary IgG. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The IgGs used in the experiment are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Densitometry was performed using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

VEGFR2 Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells and retinal tissues were lysed with lysis buffer supplemented with a proteinase inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitors, and the lysates were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Blots were hybridized with the appropriate primary IgG; antibodies against the following were used: phosphorylated VEGF receptor 2 (p-VEGFR2, Y1214: OriGene, Rockville, MD; Y1175: Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; Y1054: Millipore, Billerica, MA), phosphorylated Src (p-Src, Cell Signaling Technology), phosphorylated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p-p38 MAPK, Cell Signaling Technology), phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (p-FAK, Cell Signaling Technology), phosphorylated caveolin-1 (p-caveolin-1, BD Bioscience), VEGFR2 (Cell Signaling Technology), Src (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX), p38 MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology), FAK (Cell Signaling Technology), caveolin-1 (R&D Systems), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich). This was followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary immunoglobulin G (IgG). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Densitometry was performed using ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were separated using SDS-PAGE. The blots were hybridized with the appropriate primary IgGs: phospho-cKit (p-cKit; R&D Systems), cKit (R&D Systems), phospho-endothelial nitric oxide synthase (p-eNOS; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers MA, USA), eNOS (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and b-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary IgGs. Then, immunoreactive bands were visualized with a chemiluminescent reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Cytosolic and Nuclear β-catenin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with lysis buffer supplemented with a proteinase inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitors. Nuclear and cytosolic fractions of β-catenin were separated using nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions, respectively. Proteins were separated SDS-PAGE and blots were hybridized with the appropriate primary IgG, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary IgG. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The IgGs used in the experiment are listed in the Major Resources Table in the online-only Data Supplement. Densitometry was performed using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of LGR5 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIPA (Radio-Immunoprecipitation Assay) lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to extract proteins from cells, and protein concentration was established by Bradford method (Sigma–Aldrich, Madrid, Spain). Separation of proteins was carried out in 8% SDS-PAGE gels in which 40 µg of proteins of each sample were loaded previously heated at 65 °C for 20 minutes. Then, proteins were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (45 µm pore size) (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and blocked for 1 hour in 5% milk in TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After several washes in TBS-T, the incubation of the anti-LGR5 primary antibody (1:750) (Anti-LGR5 (OTI2A2): MA5-25,644; Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was performed overnight at 4 °C. Then, a secondary antibody (m-IgGκBP-HRP: sc-516,102; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, EEUU) was added (1:2000) for 1 hour at room temperature. Chemiluminescent reagents (Amersham Biosciences, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were used for the detection of membrane-bound antibodies. Besides, anti-β-actin IgG (A3854, Sigma Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) (1:25,000 dilution) was used as an endogenous control. The open-source Fiji image analysis software was used to quantify the bands obtained to calculate relative protein expression.28 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoblotting Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as described previously 4 (link). Protein samples were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to poly-vinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA), and finally immunoblotted with primary antibodies. Primer antibodies were used at 1:500 to 1:1000 dilution. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse and rabbit secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) were performed at 1:5000 dilution. Protein signals were detected by chemiluminescent reagents (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (12 (link)). Primary antibodies against intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; sc-1511), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1; sc-1504) (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), fractalkine (TP-213; Torrey Pines BioLabs, Houston, TX, USA), phosphorylated (p)-p65 (#3033) and p65 (#4764; both from Cell Signaling Technology) were used. The membranes were reblotted with anti-actin antibody to verify the equal loading of protein in each lane. All signals were visualized using chemiluminescent reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, London, UK) and analyzed using a densitometric scanner (LAS-3000; FujiFilm, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of equal amount of proteins were separated with 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 140 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.5) for 1 h and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies at room temperatures. The indicated protein bands were detected using chemiluminescent reagents (Amersham, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) (22) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Chemiluminescent reagent »