The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Opto engine

Manufactured by Thorlabs

The Opto Engine is a compact, high-performance optical engine designed for a variety of applications. It features a semiconductor laser source, collimating optics, and a modular housing for easy integration into custom setups.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using opto engine

1

Optogenetic Stimulation of Neuronal Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were allowed to adapt to the fiber patch cord for at least three days prior to experiments and typically not handled on the day of the experiment. Fiber optic cables (200 m diameter; NA: 0.22, 1 m long; Doric Lenses; or, 0.5m long, ThorLabs) were connected to the implanted fiber optic cannulas with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses) and coupled to lasers via a fiber optic rotary joint (Doric Lenses). We adjusted the light power of the laser (473 nm; Laserglow or Opto Engine) such that the light power (measured with a fiber optic power meter; PM20A; ThorLabs) at the end of the fiber optic cable was ~10 mW. Using an online light transmission calculator for brain tissue (http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php), we estimated the light power at the DMH or RPa between 3 and 6 mW/mm2. This is an upper limit due to possible light loss between the fiber optic cable and the implanted optic fiber. Light pulses were controlled by a waveform generator (Arduino) programmed to deliver light pulses. In most experiments (unless otherwise indicated), stimulation was on for 1 s, followed by 3 s off, pulses were 10 ms delivered at 20 Hz. After the completion of experiments, fiber placement and ChR2 expression were assessed. Animals without ChR2 expression or incorrect placement of optic fibers were excluded from analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optogenetic Stimulation of Neuronal Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were allowed to adapt to the fiber patch cord for at least three days prior to experiments and typically not handled on the day of the experiment. Fiber optic cables (200 m diameter; NA: 0.22, 1 m long; Doric Lenses; or, 0.5m long, ThorLabs) were connected to the implanted fiber optic cannulas with zirconia sleeves (Doric Lenses) and coupled to lasers via a fiber optic rotary joint (Doric Lenses). We adjusted the light power of the laser (473 nm; Laserglow or Opto Engine) such that the light power (measured with a fiber optic power meter; PM20A; ThorLabs) at the end of the fiber optic cable was ~10 mW. Using an online light transmission calculator for brain tissue (http://web.stanford.edu/group/dlab/cgi-bin/graph/chart.php), we estimated the light power at the DMH or RPa between 3 and 6 mW/mm2. This is an upper limit due to possible light loss between the fiber optic cable and the implanted optic fiber. Light pulses were controlled by a waveform generator (Arduino) programmed to deliver light pulses. In most experiments (unless otherwise indicated), stimulation was on for 1 s, followed by 3 s off, pulses were 10 ms delivered at 20 Hz. After the completion of experiments, fiber placement and ChR2 expression were assessed. Animals without ChR2 expression or incorrect placement of optic fibers were excluded from analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optogenetic Dissection of Synaptic Connectivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For CRACM, photostimulation-evoked responses were recorded using a Cs+ based, low Cl internal solution consisting of (in mM): 135 CsMeSO3, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 4 MgCl2, 4 Na2-ATP, 0.4 Na2-GTP, 10 Na2-phosphocreatine (pH 7.3 adjusted with CsOH; 295 mOsm · kg−1; ECl = −70 mV). Light-evoked EPSCs and IPSCs were recorded in whole-cell voltage clamp mode with the membrane potential clamped at Vh = −70 mV and 0 mV, respectively. CNQX and D-AP5 or bicuculline were included to isolate glutamatergic/GABAergic currents as needed. A laser or LED light source (473 nm; Opto Engine; Thorlabs) was used to evoke ChR2-mediated responses. The light output was controlled by a programmable pulse stimulator, Master-8 (A.M.P.I.) and pClamp 10.2 software (Axon Instruments). Photostimulation-evoked EPSCs/IPSCs detection protocol consisted of 4X 5msec blue light laser pulses administered 1s apart during and 8 second sweep, repeated for a total of 30 sweeps. Evoked EPSCs with short latency (≤6 ms) upon light stimulation were considered as light-driven. As discussed by others (Petreanu et al., 2007), such currents are most likely monosynaptic. TTX 5uM was applied in several cells to demonstrate definitive monosynaptic connectivity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!