The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Optima 2100 dv instrument

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The OPTIMA 2100 DV is an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) optical emission spectrometer (OES) instrument. It is designed to perform elemental analysis by detecting and quantifying the presence of various elements in a sample. The instrument utilizes a plasma source to excite the sample and measures the intensity of the emitted light at specific wavelengths to identify and determine the concentrations of the elements present.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using optima 2100 dv instrument

1

Characterization of Nanomaterial Compositions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was performed on an OPTIMA 2100 DV instrument (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Texture Analysis D8 Advance Diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu Kα radiation. The TEM and HRTEM images were obtained on a 2100F microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an EDX detector INCA x-sight (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural Characterization of Biohybrids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was performed on an OPTIMA 2100 DV instrument (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Texture Analysis D8 Advance Diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with Cu Kα radiation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained on a 2100F microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed on a TM-1000 microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). To recover the biohybrids, a Biocen 22 R (Orto-Alresa, Ajalvir, Spain) refrigerated centrifuge was used. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were determined through a SPECS GmbH electronic spectroscopy system with a UHV system (pressure approx. 10–10 mbar), with a PHOIBOS 150 9MCD energy analyzer, monochromatic X-ray sources. The analysis of the same was carried out using the CasaXPS program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Trace Element Analysis of Freshwater Macroinvertebrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In each site, 23 trace elements (Al, As, Ba, Bi, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Ga, Hg, In, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, Sr, Ti, Tl, V, and Zn) were detected in the whole bodies of macrobenthic invertebrates [35 (link)] by inductively coupled plasma-optic emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) using a Perkin Elmer Optima 2100 DV instrument (PerkinElmer, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA), coupled with a CETAC U5000AT+ ultrasound nebulizer (Cetac Technologies, Inc., Omaha, NE, USA) for mercury. All these elements can affect organisms; thus, it is important to assess their bioavailability in freshwater [30 (link)]. We analyzed the whole-body concentrations (gut contents included), since analysis of tissue concentrations alone does not allow for the detection of trace elements in sites with very low metal concentrations [51 (link)].
All samples were homogenized and microwave-digested using a Milestone ETHOS ONE oven using 4-mL nitric acid and 1-mL hydrogen peroxide. All reagents were from Merck, Darmstadt (Germany); acids were of Suprapur grade [52 (link)]. Analytical results are reported as ug g−1 wet weight (w.w.). Quality assurance tests performed during analysis included the recovery rate and blank and certified material analyses; all quality results were within acceptable ranges. Table S1 presents the limit of detection (LOD), the reference material values, and the percentages of recovery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanohybrid Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Texture
Analysis D8 ADVANCE Diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with
Cu Kα radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging
was performed on a TM-1000 microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM microscopy (HR-TEM)
images were obtained on a 2100F microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped
with an EDX detector INCA x-sight (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).
Interplanar spacing in the nanostructures was calculated by using
the inversed Fourier transform (FT) with the GATAN digital micrograph
program (Corporate Headquarters, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Spectrophotometric
analyses were run on a V-730 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan).
Inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES)
was performed on an OPTIMA 2100 DV instrument (PerkinElmer, Waltham,
MA, USA). To recover the bionanohybrids, a Biocen 22 R (Orto-Alresa,
Ajalvir, Spain) refrigerated centrifuge was used. Chromatographic
analyses were run at 25 °C using a high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) pump PU-4180 (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) and a UV-4075 UV–vis
detector (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Copper Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cu nanoparticles
sizes and morphology were determined by transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). Images were obtained on a 2100F
microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy-dispersive
X-ray (EDX) detector INCA X-sight (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, U.K.).
Interplanar spacing in the nanostructures was calculated using inversed
Fourier transform spectroscopy with the GATAN digital micrograph program
(Corporate Headquarters, Pleasanton, CA). Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) imaging was performed on a TM-1000 microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo,
Japan). Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)
was performed on an OPTIMA 2100 DV instrument (PerkinElmer, Waltham,
MA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Texture
Analysis D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA) with Cu
Kα radiation. To recover the nanobiohybrids, a Biocen 22 R (Orto-Alresa,
Ajalvir, Spain) refrigerated centrifuge was used. Spectrophotometric
analyses were run on a V-730 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan).
A synergy HT (BioTek) plate reader was used for cell viability assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Trace Element Analysis in Bee Pollen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The trace elements contained in the honey bee pollen and in the diets were also determined. Before analysis, the samples (0.5 ± 0.02 g) were placed in a Teflon vessel with 5.0 mL of 65% HNO3 and 2.0 mL of 30% H2O2 (Romil UpA). The vessel was sealed and placed in a microwave digestion system (Milestone, Bergamo, Italy). Microwave-assisted digestion was performed with a mineralization program for 15 min at 200 °C. The vessel was then cooled at 30 °C, the digestion mixture was transferred into a 50.0 mL flask, and the final volume was obtained by adding Milli-Q water [20 (link)]. Trace element concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) technique using an Optima 2100 DV instrument (PerkinElmer Inc., Wellesley, MA, USA) coupled with a CETAC U5000AT (CETAC Technologies, Omaha, NE, USA). The calibration curve and two blanks were run during each set of analyses, to check the purity of the chemicals. A reference material (CRM DORM-4, National Research Council of Canada (NRC-CNRC), Ottawa (Ontario), Canada) was also included for quality control. All the values of the reference materials were within the certified limits.
The instrumental detection limits are expressed as wet weight (w.w.) and were determined following the protocol described by Perkin Elmer ICP, application study number 57 [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!