The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in United States, Austria

R version 4.1.0 is the latest stable release of the R Project for Statistical Computing. R is a free and open-source software environment for statistical computing and graphics. It provides a wide variety of statistical and graphical techniques, and is highly extensible.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

47 protocols using r ver 4

1

Nafamostat Mesylate Dosing and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data are presented as mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR) where appropriate, and absolute numbers are presented with percentages. The probability of filter patency over time, adjusted for bleeding risk and haemofiltration, was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model. The analysis categorised the patient population into two groups based on the dosage of nafamostat mesylate: a high-dose group (≥ 20 mg/h) and a low-dose group (< 20 mg/h). The grouping was made at the median value within the range of actual administered doses.
The association between nafamostat mesylate dose and secondary outcomes were also assessed using generalised linear regression analysis or generalised logistic regression analysis. Variables used for the adjustment of confounding factors are reported in the eTable 2.
Given the nature of the observational study to explore the association in clinical settings, sample size calculation was not performed, and all data that were available from electronic health record were used for this study.
All statistical analyses were performed using R ver.4.0.5 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis Techniques in R

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test for the means±standard deviations for normally distributed continuous variables. The chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables. All analyses were performed using RStudio ver. 1.4.1106 (RStudio, Boston, MA, USA), which runs R ver. 4.0.5 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.r-project.org). Results with p-values <0.001 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Estimating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Effectiveness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences in the characteristics between the infected and uninfected groups were estimated using the chi-square test for categorical variables, and the 2-sample t-test for continuous variables. A p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. R ver. 4.1.0 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria; https://www.r-project.org/) was used to perform the statistical analysis. Regarding vaccination history, the RR of vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was calculated and compared to determine the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and VE was evaluated based on the calculated RR reduction using the following formula [19 (link)]:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Predicting Acute Myocardial Infarction in Chest Pain Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample size was calculated based on a negative predictive value of 97.5%, as established previously [7 (link)]. The sensitivity, specificity, α error, β error, and prevalence rate were set as 84%, 88%, 0.05, 0.10, and 10%, respectively. The prevalence of AMI in adults who visit the ED for nontraumatic chest pain differs in the literature and is reported to range from 4% to 17% [3 (link),18 (link)]. The study sample size was calculated based on a 10% prevalence rate. However, based on a dropout rate of 10%, 8,814 participants will be ultimately required. This calculation is based on the “bdpv” library of R ver. 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and a corresponding study [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Glycometabolic Characteristics Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characteristics of each glycometabolic category and the OGTT values were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons [24 ]. For the insulinogenic index and disposition index, outliers were excluded by Smirnov–Grubbs test. Spearman's correlation test was used to calculate the relationships between the variables. A p value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software package R ver. 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Research Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the variables in the study. The range and median were reported for continuous variables, and the frequency and proportion (%) were reported for categorical variables. For multiple group comparison, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied for pairwise comparison. A p-value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R ver. 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics, presented as percentages, were utilized to examine differences in demographic, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics among the 48 confirmed cases identified during the epidemiological investigation of this outbreak. Risk factors for infection were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with adjustments for potential confounding variables of SARS-CoV-2 infection among the 80 attendees of the 3rd to 5th screenings. In line with the Republic of Korea vaccination policy at the time, minors (those under 19 years old) were not eligible for vaccination. Consequently, we categorized the study population into 2 groups based on this age cutoff. Contacts were classified based on the criteria for determining contacts of individuals with airborne-transmitted tuberculosis during flights. Specifically, attendees seated in the same row as the index case, as well as those in the 2 rows in front of and the single row behind that individual, were designated as close contacts. All other attendees were deemed casual contacts [20 ,21 ]. R ver. 4.1.0 (The R Foundation) was used for statistical analysis, and an alpha level of 0.05 was employed to determine statistical significance. Values were presented along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Factors Influencing ASD and Mechanical Failure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed the Shapiro-Wilk test to determine if continuous variables followed a normal distribution, which showed a normal distribution. The average values and standard deviations are used to present these variables. On the other hand, categorical variables are presented them as counts and percentages (%). To compare groups, we performed PSM, based on the patient demographics (age, body mass index, and bone mineral density) and preoperative spinal condition (surgical level, pedicle diameter, and articular degeneration). Those factors are known to be associated with accuracy, ASD, and mechanical failure [20 (link)-23 (link)]. We used appropriate statistical methods such as analysis of variance and the chi-square test. Survival analysis and log-rank test were employed to account for the difference in follow-up periods between ASD rate and mechanical failure, ensuring an examination of the disparities in each group. We conducted Cox regression analyses not only for comparisons among groups but also for the entire patient cohort. We aimed to identify potential factors influencing radiological and clinical ASD, and mechanical failure by hazard ratios (HRs).
Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided p-value less than 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using R ver. 4.1.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Survival and Recurrence Analysis for Prognostic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test. Survival and cumulative incidence of recurrence by risk group were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted using a Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify prognostic factors that may affect survival. Risk factors for PCs were analyzed using binary logistic regression. Variables with a p-value ≤0.1 were included in the multivariable analyses. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R ver. 4.1.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.r-project.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Online Survey of Public Perceptions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The survey was conducted online. Participants were briefed on the study, agreed to participate, and read the vignette described above. We did not set a time limit for reading the vignette and asked the participants to move forward when they fully understood the contents. Subsequently, they responded to the four items, confirming that they had read the vignette correctly (see OSF). Data from participants who answered even one of these incorrectly were not used in the analysis. The participants responded to the items of social acceptance, trust in the city government, perceived benefit, perceived necessity, perceived risk, concern about interventions for individuals, perceived health competence, and demographics.
The statistical software R (ver. 4.1.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used for the analysis. The statistical significance level was set to α = 0.05. No missing values were found in the data obtained in this study. The data and R scripts used in the analysis were posted on the OSF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!