The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

867 protocols using topspin 3

1

Alginate NMR Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1D 1H NMR spectroscopy was used to analyze the degree of substitution as well as the uronic acid composition of the alginates. The samples were subjected to mild acid hydrolysis as previously described [53 ] to reduce the viscosity prior to the NMR analysis. 6–10 mg of the samples were then dissolved in 600 µL D2O (99.9%) and added 5 µL 3-(Trimethylsilyl)propionic 2,2,3,3-d4 acid (TSP, Sigma-Aldrich, Oslo, Norway) as an internal standard and 15 µL Triethylenetetraamine-hexaacetic acid (TTHA, Sigma Aldrich) as a chelating agent for residual divalent ions. The latter was not added to samples already added EDTA (analysis of leaked alginate). 1D 1H spectra were recorded at 90 °C on a Bruker Ascend 400 MHz Avance III HD spectrometer, equipped with a 5-mm SmartProbe z-gradient probe and SampleCase (Bruker BioSpin AG, Fällanden, Switzerland). The spectra were recorded using TopSpin 3.2 software (Bruker BioSpin, Fällanden, Switzerland) and processed and analyzed with TopSpin 3.5 software (Bruker BioSpin).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

NMR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were received in MeOH and transferred to pre-weighed scintillation vials, rinsing the ampoules with MeOH (3 × 0.5 mL). The solvent was evaporated under a stream of dry N2, weighed, dissolved in CD3OD (750 µL, 99.5 atom % D; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover, MA, USA), and transferred to NMR tubes (5 mm i.d.). 1H NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker DRX-500 NMR spectrometer at 500.13 MHz (64 scans, 20 °C) using Icon NMR in Bruker TopSpin 3.2, and data were processed with TopSpin 3.6.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive NMR Metabolite Profiling of CSF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze metabolites, one-dimensional 1H-NOESY NMR spectrum was obtained at 298 K on a Bruker ASCEND III 600 spectrometer equipped with a cryoprobe. The NOESY pulse sequence (noesygppr1d) was applied with presaturation to suppress the residual water signal. 1H-NMR spectrum for each sample consisted of 256 scans with following parameters: spectral width = 12,019.2 Hz, spectral size = 65,536 points, pulse width (90) = 12.2 μs, relaxation delay (RD) = 5.0 s, and a mixing time of 10 ms.
For quantitative profiling of CSF samples, spectra were processed and analyzed with Bruker topspin 3.1 (Bruker GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and Chenomx NMR suite 7.7 (Chenomx Inc., Edmonton, Canada). Each free induction decay (FID) was zero-filled to 64,000 points and transformed with line broadening (LB) = 0.3 Hz. NMR spectra were initially phased in Bruker topspin 3.1 and the final baseline was corrected using Chenomx NMR suite 7.7. The baseline model was built in each spectrum using the algorithm of multipoint baseline correction. The chemical shifts were referenced against the resonance of TSP as 0.0 ppm. Metabolites were identified using the database stored in Chenomx NMR suite 7.7 and were quantified from the comparison of the internal standard (TSP). A total of 31 metabolites identified from the CSF samples. The identified metabolites were evaluated in 1H-13C HSQC and 2D 1H-TOCSY spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NMR Characterization of PPARγ-RXRα Heterodimer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR data were collected at 298K on a 700 MHz Bruker NMR instrument equipped with a conventional TXI triple resonance probe and on a 800 MHz Varian NMR instrument equipped with a cryogenically cooled triple resonance probe. Ligands that were added to proteins were dissolved in DMSO-d6. NMR experiments were performed using pulse sequences and standard experimental parameters provided with Bruker Topspin 3.0. RXRα LBD chemical shift assignments37 (link) were validated and/or transferred to various complexed states using standard 2D and 3D NMR TROSY-based methods, including HSQC, HNCO, HNCA, HN(CO)CA and HN(CA)CB and 15 (link)N-NOESY-HSQC experiments. Data were processed using Bruker Topspin 3.0 or NMRPipe58 (link) and analyzed with NMRViewJ59 (link). NMR chemical shift perturbations (ΔδCSP) for PPARγ LBD in the monomer form and heterodimerized to RXRα LBD were calculated from published values51 (link) as follows: ΔδCSP = |ΔδHN| + (0.154 * |ΔδN|) + (0.341 * |ΔδC’|); with ΔδHN , ΔδN and ΔδC’ as the backbone 1 (link)HN, 15 (link)N and 13 (link)C’ (carbonyl) NMR chemical shift differences between monomer and heterodimer, respectively, and mapped onto the PPARγ LBD crystal structure (PDB 2PRG).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

NMR Characterization of PPARγ-RXRα Heterodimer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR data were collected at 298 K on a 700 MHz Bruker NMR instrument equipped with a conventional TXI triple resonance probe and on a 800-MHz Varian NMR instrument equipped with a cryogenically cooled triple resonance probe. Ligands that were added to proteins were dissolved in DMSO-d6. NMR experiments were performed using pulse sequences and standard experimental parameters provided with Bruker Topspin 3.0. RXRα LBD chemical shift assignments37 (link) were validated and/or transferred to various complexed states using standard 2D and 3D NMR TROSY-based methods, including HSQC, HNCO, HNCA, HN(CO)CA and HN(CA)CB and 15N-NOESY-HSQC experiments. Data were processed using Bruker Topspin 3.0 or NMRPipe58 (link) and analysed with NMRViewJ59 (link). NMR chemical shift perturbations (ΔδCSP) for PPARγ LBD in the monomer form and heterodimerized to RXRα LBD were calculated from published values51 (link) as follows: ΔδCSP=|ΔδHN|+(0.154 × |ΔδN|)+(0.341 × |ΔδC′|); with ΔδHN, ΔδN and ΔδC′ as the backbone 1HN, 15N and 13C′ (carbonyl) NMR chemical shift differences between monomer and heterodimer, respectively, and mapped onto the PPARγ LBD crystal structure (PDB 2PRG).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

NMR Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 SR-Peptide and Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-dimensional (1D) 1H NMR experiments and two-dimensional (2D) 1H-1H TOCSY, NOESY, and 1H-15N/1H-13C heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) experiments of the SR-peptide (residues A182-S197) of NSARS-CoV-2 were acquired at 5 °C on a Bruker 700 MHz spectrometer equipped with a triple-resonance 5 mm cryogenic probe using the software Top Spin 3.5 (Bruker). The peptide concentration was 4 mM for resonance assignment and 200 µM for the interaction analysis with polyU (800 kDa). Samples were in 50 mM NaP, 0.01% NaN3 and 5% D2O. Spectra were processed with TopSpin 3.6 (Bruker) and analyzed using Sparky35 (link). Secondary structure was analyzed subjecting experimental HA, HN, N, CA and CB chemical shifts to TALOS+36 (link). The chemical shift perturbation (CSP) for the peptide residues is the one of the NH protons from the TOCSY experiment. The CSP error is based on the resolution of the spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural Characterization of G623R Fibrils via Solid-State NMR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3D NCACX, NCOCX and CANCO and 2D 13C-13C DARR (Dipolar Assisted Rotational Resonance), NCA and NCO experiments of the G623R fibrils were performed on an 18.8 T Bruker Advance III instrument equipped with a 1.9 mm HCN MAS probe (Table S6). These experiments were setup with reference to paper by Shi et al.52 (link). The MAS spinning frequency was 17.857 kHz and variable temperature was set such that the actual temperature was 12 °C. Chemical shifts were referenced using the DSS scale with adamantane as a secondary standard for 13C (downfield signal at 40.48 ppm)53 (link) and were indirectly calculated for 15N. ssNMR data were processed in Topspin 3.5 (Bruker Corporation) and then analyzed using the Sparky software (T. D. Goddard and D. G. Kneller, SPARKY 3, University of California, San Francisco). For the G623R fibrils and L-PGDS complex sample, 1D 13C CP (Cross-Polarisation) spectrum and 2D DARR (mixing time = 20 ms and 75 ms) were collected. The ssNMR data were then processed in Topspin 3.5 (Bruker Corporation) and then compared with the previously obtained spectrum of G623R fibrils using the Sparky software54 (link). The equation used for the chemical shift perturbations is as described previously37 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

2D-TROSY NMR Spectroscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2-dimensional [15N, 1H]-transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy (TROSY) (Pervushin et al., 1997 (link)) correlation spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance II 800 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5-mm TXI-HCN probe running Topspin 3.1 (Bruker Biospin). Experiments were recorded at 307 Kelvin, and the sample temperature was calibrated using a standard commercial sample (4% methanol in methanol-d4). Chemical shifts were referenced to an internal DSS standard and correlated with earlier studies (Eddy et al., 2018b (link)). TROSY spectra were measured with acquisition periods of 98 ms in 1H, 22.5 ms in 15N, and a 1 s recycle delay for a total acquisition time of approximately 18 hours per experiment. NMR data were processed identically in Topspin 3.6.1 (Bruker Biospin) with the following parameters: prior to Fourier transformation, the data matrices were zero filled to 1024 (t1) x 4096 (t2) complex points and multiplied by a Gaussian window function in the direct acquisition dimension and a 75°-shifted sine bell window function in the indirect dimension.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative NMR Analysis of Polar Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for qNMR analysis were prepared as follows: 30 mg dried polar extract was weighed out precisely, re-dissolved in 1 mL of methanol-d4, and the container of the sample was sealed. Subsequently, the compounds were dissolved using vortex-shaking and centrifuged for 3 min (3000 r/min) to remove the suspended matter. A 600-μL aliquot of the supernatant solution was transferred into an NMR tube and analyzed immediately by 1H-NMR. The same operation was performed for salicylic acid, which was used as an external standard. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
1H-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 600 NMR spectrometer. Topspin 3.5 software (Bruker, Germany) was used. The 1H-NMR quantitative experimental parameters were set based on those described by Tapiolas et al. [32 (link)]. Quantification was performed using the magnetic resonance quantitative tool-ERETIC2 (Electronic Reference To access In vivo Concentrations) based on Topspin 3.5 software (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, German) [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-field NMR protocol with automated setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The spectrometer contained a Bruker AVANCE III HD (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) console combined with a 14.1-T magnet for 1H 600 MHz. It was equipped with a 5-mm inverse triple resonance CryoProbe (1H/13C/15N) with cold preamplifiers for 1H and 13C and a z-axis gradient with automated tuning and matching. The spectrometer contained a Bruker SampleJet system (Bruker Bipspin AG, Fällanden, Switzerland) set to 5-mm shuttle mode with a cooling rack for keeping samples at 279 K. The data were acquired and processed using Topspin 3.2 (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany), and experiments were run under automation using the IconNMR program (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany). The experiments were conducted using standard pulse sequences, namely noesygppr1d, cpmgpr1d, and zg30 (Topspin 3.2, Bruker Biospin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!