The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using meg system

1

MEG Resting-State Protocol for Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants underwent 5-min eyes-closed resting-state MEG, using a 306-channel Elekta Neuromag Oy MEG system, with a sampling frequency of 1250Hz and 0.1Hz high pass and 410Hz antialiasing filters (Supplementary materials). We used cross-validation signal space separation, after which raw data were visually inspected and malfunctioning channels excluded [LD]. The signal was filtered between 0.5-45Hz. We used a 3D digitizer (Fastrak; Polhelmus) to digitize 4–5 head position indicator coils and the scalp-nose surface for co-registration of the MEG data to patients’ anatomical MRIs. A scalar beamformer implementation (Elekta Neuromag Oy, version 2.1.28) source-reconstructed broadband (0.5-45Hz) time series to the 210 BNA centroids [27 (link), 29 (link), 30 (link)]. We selected 15 and 8 epochs for patients and HCs, respectively (3.27s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Magnetoencephalography and Structural MRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recordings were conducted in a magnetically-shielded room with active shielding engaged. With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). MEG data from each participant were individually-corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension39 (link). Each participant’s MEG data were then coregistered with their structural T1-weighted MRI data using BESA MRI (Version 2.0; BESA GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany). These neuroanatomic images were acquired with a Philips Achieva 3T X-series scanner using an eight-channel head coil and a 3D fast field echo sequence with the following parameters: TR: 8.09 ms; TE: 3.7 ms; field of view: 24 cm; matrix: 256 × 256; slice thickness: 1 mm with no gap; in-plane resolution: 0.9375 ×  0.9375 mm; sense factor: 1.5. The structural MRI volumes were aligned parallel to the anterior and posterior commissures and were transformed into standardized space after source imaging (i.e., beamforming)40 (link)41 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed MEG Acquisition and Preprocessing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were performed in a one-layer magnetically shielded room with active shielding engaged for environmental noise compensation. With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta MEG system (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland) with 306 magnetic sensors, including 204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers. Throughout data acquisition, participants were monitored using a real-time audio-video feed from inside the magnetically shielded room. MEG data from each participant were individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link)). Each participant’s MEG data were coregistered with their structural T1-weighted MRI data prior to imaging analyses using BESA MRI (Version 2.0). Structural MRI data were aligned parallel to the anterior and posterior commissures and transformed into standardized space. After beamformer analysis (see below), each subject’s functional images were transformed into standardized space using the transform that was previously applied to the structural MRI volume and spatially resampled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Magnetoencephalography Pipeline for Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In general, the MEG methods detailed in sections 2.3 through 2.6 closely approximate the pipeline established in earlier papers from our group (Heinrichs-Graham & Wilson, 2015 (link); McDermott et al., 2017 (link); Proskovec et al., 2016 (link); Wiesman, Groff, et al., 2018 ; Wiesman et al., 2016 ; Wiesman, Heinrichs-Graham, Proskovec, McDermott, & Wilson, 2017 (link); Wiesman, Mills, et al., 2018 (link); Wiesman, O’Neill, et al., 2018 ; Wilson et al., 2017 (link)). All recordings were conducted in a one-layer magnetically-shielded room with active shielding engaged for environmental noise compensation. Neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz with an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz using a 306-sensor Elekta MEG system (Helsinki, Finland) equipped with 204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers. Participants were monitored during data acquisition via real-time audio–video feeds from inside the shielded room. Each MEG dataset was individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu & Simola, 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Magnetically-Shielded MEG Recording

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were conducted in a one-layer magnetically-shielded room with active shielding engaged for environmental noise compensation. Neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz with an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1– 330 Hz using a 306-sensor Elekta MEG system (Helsinki, Finland) equipped with 204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers. Participants were monitored during data acquisition via real-time audio–video feeds from inside the shielded room. Each MEG dataset was individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Magnetoencephalography for Neuroscience Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuromagnetic responses were acquired within a magnetically-shielded room using an Elekta MEG system with 306 sensors (102 magnetometers and 204 planar gradiometers; Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Signals were sampled at 1 kHz with an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz. Each MEG data set was corrected for head motion, and the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (tSSS; Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link); Taulu et al., 2005 ) was applied for noise reduction. Further details are provided in several recent papers (Embury et al., 2019 (link); Lew et al., 2019 (link); Spooner et al., 2018 (link); Wiesman and Wilson, 2020 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MEG Data Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were conducted in a one-layer MSR with active shielding engaged. With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors, including 102 magnetometers and 204 planar gradiometers (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (v2.2.1; Elekta), MEG data from each subject were individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu et al., 2005 ; Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link)). All analyses for this study were focused on the data collected by the 204 gradiometers. For motion correction, the position of the head throughout the recording was aligned to the individual’s head position when the recording was initiated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Magnetoencephalography Data Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG signals were sampled at 1 kHz with an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz using a 306-sensor Elekta MEG system equipped with 204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers. All data were corrected for head movement, subjected to a noise reduction method (Taulu and Simola, 2006 ), and co-registered to high-resolution structural MRI. For a detailed account of the data acquisition, co-registration, and preprocessing steps used in this study, please refer to the Supplementary material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MEG Recording and Preprocessing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electromagnetic brain activity was recorded using a 102 triple-sensor (two planar gradio-, one magnetometer) MEG system (Elekta Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland). Data was sampled continuously at 1 kHz. Prior to the experiment, the headshape of each participant was measured using a Polhemus FASTRAK 3D digitiser, relative to five coils (two on the left and right mastoid, three coils on the front). Head movement was monitored by passing small currents through these coils before each run. From most participants, an anatomical 3D structural image was obtained using a 4T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner (Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen Germany). All MEG data was analysed using the Matlab-based Fieldtrip toolbox38 (link). Epochs of +/−2000 ms length were extracted around stimulus onset and 1 Hz highpass filtered. Then, the data was visually inspected to identify and remove noisy trials, channel jumps and ocular artefacts. After the artefact rejection, all trials were downsampled to 300 Hz. In all further analyses, an equal number of detected and undetected trials was randomly selected to prevent any bias across conditions39 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Magnetoencephalography Data Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were conducted in a one-layer magnetically-shielded room with active shielding engaged. Neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz with an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (v2.2; Elekta), MEG data from each patient were individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link), Taulu et al., 2005 ). Each participant's MEG data were coregistered with structural T1-weighted MRI data prior to source space analyses using BESA MRI (Version 2.0). Structural MRI data were aligned parallel to the anterior and posterior commissures and transformed into standardized space. After beamformer analysis, each subject's functional images were also transformed into standardized space using the transform applied to the structural MRI volume and spatially resampled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!