The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using anti dmp1

1

Immunofluorescent Labeling of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hMSCs and mMSCs were fixed with formaldehyde (4% in PBS), permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.4% in PBS), incubated with blocking buffer (10% donkey serum in PBS), and stained with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Then, cells were treated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) was used for nuclear DNA staining. The antibodies used are as follows: anti-RANK (ab12008, 1:100), anti-CD90 (Abcam, ab21624, 1:200), anti-DMP1 (Santa Cruz, sc-17320, 1:100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DPCs were isolated by differential digestion as described above, after which total protein was extracted and normalized according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primary antibodies were anti-APE1 (1:1,000; abcam, USA), anti-DMP1 (1:1,000; Santa cruz, USA), anti-DSP1-H (1:1,000; Santa cruz, USA), anti-OPN (1:1000; abcam, USA), anti-ALP (1:1,000; abcam, USA), anti-OSX (1:1,000; abcam, USA), anti-Axin (1:1000; abcam, USA), anti-Lef1 (1:1000; abcam, USA), anti-non-p (active) β-catenin (1:1000; CST, USA), anti-p-GSK-3β (1:1000; CST, USA), anti-P21 (1:1000; abcam, USA), anti-cyclin-D1 (1:1,000; Santa cruz, USA) and anti-GAPDH (1:10,000; Zen, China) used as internal control. Then, the membranes were rinsed with TBST (0.1% Tween-20 in 0.01 mol/L TBS), incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:5000 (Santa Cruz, USA) at room temperature for additional 2 h, visualized by Image Quant LAS 4000 mini (GE, UK). Densitometry analysis on the bands was performed using the NIH image J software and normalizing the data to total protein levels (Supplementary Fig. 1. and Supplementary Fig. 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining of Dental Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The paraffin slices of teeth were permeabilized with 0.1% triton, blocked with normal goat serum, and then incubated with anti‐DMP1 (Santa Cruz biotechnology, #sc‐73633), and anti‐BSP II (Santa cruz biotechnology, #sc‐73630) primary antibody for 1 h. After washed thrice with TBST, the slices were incubated with FICT or FRITC conjugated goat secondary antibody for 1 h, respectively. Finally, the slices were washed thrice with TBST, stained with DAPI before sealing the surface, and observed on the upright fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Neural and Dental Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections or cells were fixed, washed and blocked, and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-Nestin (1/200; Abcam), anti-NF200 (1/200; Abcam), anti-MBP101 (1/200; Abcam), anti-Active β-catenin (1/200; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-DSPP (1/200; Zen Bioscience), anti-DMP1 (1/200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CD31 (1/200; Zen Bioscience), and anti-VEGF (1/200; Abcam). The goat anti-rabbit 488 (1/200; Invitrogen) and goat anti mouse 488 (1/200; Invitrogen) secondary antibodies were used. Sections or cells were counterstained with DAPI, mounted with fluorescent mounting media and visualized using a fluorescence confocal microscope (Olympus FV1200, Olympus). Accordingly, quantitative analysis of the staining was conducted by measuring the average optical density using the ImageJ software. At least 3 replicates were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Osteogenic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 4% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature. Proteins were detected with primary antibodies anti-DMP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-RUNX2 (MBL, Woburn, MA, USA), anti-BMP2 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-OCN (Abcam), and anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Enzo Life Sciences, Minneapolis, MN, USA). It was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Signals were detected using a Fusion Solo X (Vilber, Paris, France). The protein expression levels were normalized to that of β-actin. All Western blot analyses were repeated three times under the same conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Dental Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glass coverslips were sterilized by dipping them in 90% ethanol, and then carefully drying them over a flame. Then, a coverslip was placed in each well of a sterile 6-well tissue culture plate. Cell suspensions containing 1 × 104 cells/mL were added to each coverslip. After incubating the cells for 24 h, the medium was switched to material extract. After exposure to the extract medium for 7 days, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Then, they were incubated in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min. After blocking with 10% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature, cells were incubated for 2 h with monoclonal mouse anti-DSPP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-DMP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or anti-ON (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1:100) in 10% goat serum. Then, the cells were incubated with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse-FITC) for 2 h at room temperature. Coverslips were mounted onto slides using mounting solution. Fluorescent images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histology and Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histology and immunohistochemistry analysis, sections of 6 µm were made for hematoxylin/eosin staining. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described 35 (link). Primary anti-DSPP (1/200; Zen Bioscience), anti-DMP1 (1/200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-OCN (1/200; Zen Bioscience) antibodies were used. Detection of crossreacted secondary antibodies was performed using the DAB kit (Gene Tech, China). Accordingly, quantitative analysis of the staining was conducted by measuring the average optical density using the ImageJ software. At least 3 serial sections from each sample were examined, and at least 3 samples were included in each group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Western Blot Analysis of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The automated western blot was performed using Simple Wes (Protein Simple, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 1.5 μg of protein from the cell lysates or exosomes was added to the standard fluorescent mastermix, then was loaded into corresponding wells of the prefilled Wes assay plate, along with antibody diluent (Protein Simple, USA), anti-DSP (Santa Cruz, USA), anti-DMP1, anti-RUNX2, anti-ALP, anti-CD9, anti-CD63, anti-TGFβ1, anti-TGFR1, anti-Smad2/3, anti-p-Smad2/3, anti-Smad4, anti-β-Tublin (Affinity, USA), anti-LTBP1 (Affinity, USA), anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Protein Simple, USA), and Streptavidin-HRP, followed by luminal peroxide mix. The imaging and analysis were done with compass software (Protein Simple, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!