The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 16.0 statistical package

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 16.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, including data management, statistical modeling, and reporting. The software is designed to handle a wide range of data types and can be used for a variety of statistical analyses, such as regression, correlation, and hypothesis testing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using spss version 16.0 statistical package

1

Genetic Variation Analysis in Cancer Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotype frequencies of each SNP in the control subjects were checked using the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Power analysis was carried out using the online calculator at http://sampsize.sourceforge.net/iface/s3.html. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel. P < 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance. Differences in the distribution were analyzed using logistic regression. The genotype frequencies of cases and controls were calculated using a χ2 test [15 (link), 16 (link)]. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were tested using unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and gender [17 (link)]. The allele, overdominant and log-additive models were applied using PLINK software (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/) to assess the association of SNPs with the risk of gastric and colorectal cancers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Analysis of Steroid-Induced ONFH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotype frequencies of each SNP in the control subjects were checked using the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and Microsoft Excel (Chicago, IL). The significance of the difference of alleles and genotype frequencies between the groups was tested using the chi-square method.[21 (link)]P < 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance. Differences in the distribution were analyzed using logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were tested using unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and gender.[22 (link)] The 3 genetic models (Dominant, Recessive, and Additive) were applied by PLINK software (Chicago, IL) (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/) to assess the association of single SNPs with the risk of steroid-induced ONFH. The analyses of linkage disequilibrium (LD), and haplotype construction was used by the Haploview software package (version 4.2) (Chicago, IL).[23 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Association Analysis of Schizophrenia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 16.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel. All p values were two-sided, and values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. The genotype frequencies for each SNP in the control subjects were checked using the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to calculate the allele and genotype frequencies among cases and controls. Associations between the genotypes and schizophrenia risk were estimated by computing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) evaluated in three genetic models (dominant, recessive, additive model) using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age and gender. We determined p values for trend by entering the variable as a single term in the model (i.e., one degree of-freedom) and testing using Wald's test. Finally, the Haploview software package (version 4.2) and SHEsis software platform (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php) were used for estimate the pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD), haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Student's t-test Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS version 16.0 statistical package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) using the Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Variation Analysis in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using the SPSS version 16.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). All probability values (P values) below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Differences in the allelic and genotypic association of each SNP were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Chi-squared test to compare genetic variations between the BC patients and the healthy participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Variants and Disease Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotype frequencies were tested using the Hardy-Weinberg exact test. The significant differences between the controls were calculated using the chi-square test. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated using Fisher's exact test and SPSS version 16.0 statistical package (SPSS, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!