The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using ultimate 3000 rslc nanolc

1

Acetylated Protein Quantification via PRM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To further verify the expression levels of acetylated proteins taking part in ROS and acetylation, candidate proteins were measured using parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) method following the previous procedures28 . The main steps were as follow: The peptides of hyphae and sclerotia were prepared with the final concentrations of 1 μg/μL. Peptides were separated by two dimensional chromatographic systems, and then the PRM data were acquired on UltiMate3000 RSLC nano LC (Dionex, CA) and Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, CA) mass spectrometry system. Parameters or settings for PRM acquisition and processing were consistent with the previous study28 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UHPLC analysis was achieved using an UltiMate 3000RSLC nano-LC (Dionex, Benelux, Amsterdam, Netherlands) furnished with a binary rapid separation capillary flow pump and a ternary separation loading pump (NCP-3200RS UltiMate3000). Only the loading pump was employed in this study. The complete configuration of the system includes a thermostated column compartment and a four-channel variable wavelength detector (VWD-3400RS UltiMate 3000) with a 2.5 µL flow cell and a manual VICI Valco injector (Valco Instruments, Houston, TX, USA). The UV detector was set at a time constant of 0.10 s and a data collection rate of 100 Hz. UV detection was performed at 214 nm. The temperature of the column oven was set at 50 °C. The flow rate was set at 0.2 mL/min for those columns with 2.1 mm I.D., 0.5 mL/min for that with 3.0 mm I.D., and 1.0 mL/min for that with 4.6 mm I.D.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanospray Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The above digests (0.2 μg)
were analyzed on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC Nano LC with an Acclaim
pepmap100 column with a nanospray source connected to one of two mass
spectrometers: a Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer
or an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Waltham, MA) in the positive ion mode. Mobile phase A consisted of
0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic
acid in ACN. The peptides were eluted by increasing mobile phase B
from 1% to 90% over 120 min. Data was collected using a data-dependent
mode with a dynamic exclusion of 20 s. The top 10 most abundant precursor
ions were selected from a 250 m/z to 1850 m/z full scan for HCD and ion trap fragmentation (FT-CID)
with normalized collisional energy (NCE) parameters (NCE of 16, 20,
24, 32, and 36). The resolution of full MS scan and MS/MS scan was
set at 120,000 and 30,000 on the Fusion Lumos and at 70,000 and 17,500
on the Q Exactive, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Identification of Human Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptide mixture was subjected to the Ultimate 3000 RSLC nanoLC, separated by online reversed-phase chromatography, and then injected into the Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) via Nano-ESI source. MS data was firstly converted to mgf file by ProteoWizard and then retrieved by Mascot software (Matrix Science), using the protein database of Home sapiens from Swissport. The search parameters were set as follows: Enzyme: Trypsin/P; Allow up to: 2 missed cleavages; Fixed modifications: Carbamidomethyl (C); Variable modifications: Oxidation (M); MS tol.: 10 PPM, MS/MS tol.: 0.02 Da. The PSM (peptide-spectrum-match) hit was re-scored by Percolator, and the retrieval results were filtered using the Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo) under the following conditions: FDR < 1%, Number of peptides matched ≥ 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Cellular Protein Abundance via MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In solution, fractionation mass spectrometry (MS) was used to estimate the number of protein copies per cell based on the method described in Liu et al. (2019) (link). Cells were harvested and lysed in 600 µL solution containing 4% SDS, 100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.6, and 0.1 M DTT. The lysate was incubated at 95°C for 5 min and then sonicated (20% power, 20 sec, 2 pulses). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 16,000g at room temperature for 5 min. Then 200 µL of cell lysate was prepared using the filter-aided sample preparation method. An Ultracel-10K (UFC501024; Millipore) filter was used for protein purification and trypsin digestion.
Mass spectrometry of the trypsinized peptides was performed by UT Southwestern proteomic core. An Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano-LC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in-line connected to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for MS analysis. In brief, the sample was fractionated into 10 injections and peptides were loaded onto a reverse-phase column (Easy Spray column, either 75 µm × 50 cm or 75 µm × 75 cm, 2 µ beads). Raw files were processed using MaxQuant and used the latest human database from Uniprot. We then used the label-free quantization (LFQ, normalized intensity) data and histone signal to calculate the number of protein copies per cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Phosphoproteomics of T-Loop

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The QuantaKinome platform was applied to measure T-loop phosphopeptides by using a targeted LC-MS approach which is based on the method described in Schmidlin et al. Briefly, frozen biopsy were lysed in SDC lysis buffer, proteins were extracted and 200 μg of protein was digested with LysC for 2 h (1:50 enzyme to protein ratio) and trypsin overnight (1:50 enzyme to protein ratio) (method is described in more detail previously by Schmidlin et al.14 (link)). Peptides were desalted and phosphorylated peptides were enriched using an automated platform (Agilent Bravo) as described previously (Post et al.). Samples were dried and stored at −80°C until LC-MS analysis, performed on a TSQ Altis (Thermo Scientific) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 ((Thermo Scientific) equipped with a ES802 analytical LC column. Next, half of the processed samples were measured in randomized order using the targeted LC-MS assay. Samples were dissolved in 2% FA and loaded on an ES802 column on an Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano LC coupled to a TSQ Altis (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Peptide Separation and Identification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cleaned peptide mixtures were dried completely and resuspended in 20 μl of loading solvent [0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water/acetonitrile, 2/98 (v/v)]. Two microliters of the peptide mixtures were analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)–MS/MS on an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano LC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) in-line connected to a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated with a linear gradient at 300 nl/min from 98% solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) to 55% solvent B [0.1% formic acid in water/acetonitrile, 20/80 (v/v)] in 120 min before ultimately reaching 99% solvent B. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent, positive ionization mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS acquisition for the 10 most abundant peaks in a given MS spectrum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Mouse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC/MS analysis was performed using an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano LC system coupled on-line to an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reversed-phase separation was performed using a 50 cm analytical column (in-house packed with Poroshell 120 EC-C18, 2.7 µm, Agilent Technologies) with a 120 min gradient. Label-free quantification was performed using MaxQuant (version 1.6.1.0) using the following parameters: MS ion mass tolerance: 4.5 ppm; MS2 ion mass tolerance: 0.5 Da; variable modification: Cys carbamidomethyl, Cys Propionamide, Met oxidation; protease: Trypsin (R,K); allowed number of mis-cleavage: 2; database: SwissProt database of Mouse (2016 oktuniprot-proteome, number of sequences: 22,136); label free quantification and match between runs were enabled. Results were reported at 1% FDR at the protein level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
30 μg of total protein of each sample (in triplicate) was prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis with the S-Trap® Micro Spin Column (ProtiFi, Farmingdale, NY, USA) digestion protocol according to the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modifications. 2 μg of purified peptides of each sample was then injected on an Ultimate 3000 RSLC nanoLC (Thermo Scientific®, Bremen, Germany) in-line connected to an LTQ-Orbitrap Elite (Thermo Fisher®). Detailed sample processing methodology and the mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [41] (link) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD025633.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Identification of Z. mobilis Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyacrylamide gel bands containing protein were digested with trypsin. To identify proteins, LC-MS/MS was performed using the Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano LC coupled to the Thermo Orbitrap Elite with a 2 h run time at the ICMB Proteomics Facility using published methods (Shevchenko et al., 2006 (link)). Proteins were searched against the Uniprot Z. mobilis ATCC ZM4 database (April 27, 2016) using Sequest HT in Proteome Discoverer 1.4. The identifications were validated with Scaffold v4.4.1 (Proteome Software) with greater than 99.0% probability and with a minimum of two peptides at 99.0% peptide probability. In Scaffold, peptide and protein false discovery rates were both calculated as 0.0%. The experiments for each strain/condition were performed in two replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!