The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using ab181255

1

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted by RIPA lysis buffer (Keygen). After detection of protein concentration, extracted protein was separated with SDS‐PAGE (Beyotime). After transferring onto PVDF membranes (Millipore), the membranes were blocked in non‐fat dried milk (Yili). After that, the membranes were probed with unique primary antibodies: KI67 (ab181255; 1:5000; Abcam), Bax (ab32503; 1:3000; Abcam), multidrug resistance protein (MRP1; ab76464; 1:1000; Abcam), CRABP2 (ab181255; 1:3000; Abcam), and β‐actin (ab8226; 1:1000; Abcam), and then secondary antibody was used for combination with primary antibodies. At last, the combined signals were detected by ECL reagent (Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Staining of Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were fixed in formalin solution (10%) and embedded in paraffin, followed by cutting into 4‐μm‐thick section. Afterwards, these sections were probed with the primary antibody: CRABP2 (ab181255; 1:100; Abcam) or Ki67 (ab15580; 1:200; Abcam). Next, these sections were incubated with secondary antibody (ab171870; 1:2000; Abcam). After staining with diaminoaniline (DAB; Maxim, Fuzhou, China) and counterstaining with hematoxylin (Maxim), the sections were observed using a microscopy (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

MPNST Immunohistochemistry in NF1 Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human MPNST specimens from NF1 patients and non-NF1 patients were kindly provided by Prof. W. Paulus (Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany). These experiments were approved by ethics committee at „Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe Münster”(2007-261-f-S). Written informed consent was provided for participation. MPNST cell pellets were frozen at -80°C, fixed in 4% PFA and stored in 70% ethanol until paraffin embedding. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE) of FFPE samples was performed in an automated staining instrument Tissue Tek Glas and Prisma system (Sakura). For immunohistochemistry of FFPE samples, slices were deparaffinised and pre-treated with target retrieval solution (pH 6.1). Immunohistochemistry was performed using the DAKO REAL Detection Kit (K5001) according to the provided protocol and the automated staining instrument AutostainerLink 48 (Dako). Deparaffinised sections were incubated with primary anti-CRABP2 antibody (Abcam ab181255, monoclonal, from rabbit, 1:100). Staining was visualized by DAB staining followed by nuclear counterstaining with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CRABP2 and HIF1α Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In brief, tissue sections were firstly deparaffinized and graded with xylene and alcohol solutions, and then exposed antigen by high pressure heat repair in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and blocked endogenous peroxidase by 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. Then sections were incubated with primary antibody CRABP2 (1:100, Cat#ab181255, abcam) or HIF1α (1:100, Cat#ab51608, abcam) for overnight at 4°C, and incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at 37°C following with DAB staining for 5 min to visualize immunolabeling. The expression levels of CRABP2 or HIF1α were obtained by multiplying the percentage of positive staining score with the staining intensity score. Percentage points is defined as: 1 (0% ~ 25%), 2 (26% ~ 50%), 3 (51% ~ 75%), 4 (76% ~ 100%). Intensity scores were defined as: 0 (no staining), 1 (low staining), 2 (moderate staining), and 3 (high staining). According to the final score, all tissues were divided into high expression group (score ≥6) and low expression group (score < 6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!