The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

53 protocols using centrifuge 5418

1

Optimized Flower Extract Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flower extracts were prepared as described by Grzeszczuk et al. [46 (link)] with modifications. The dried plant material was ground in a grinder, and then the homogenized material (0.5 g) was supplemented with 40 mL of 80% methanol and deionized water in 7:3 ratio (v/v). The samples were placed in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The extracts were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000× g (Centrifuge 5418 Eppendorf, Warsaw, Poland) and filtered through 0.22 µm nylon membrane filters (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). All the extractions were prepared in triplicate. The final extracts were stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fern Leaf Extract Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracts of fern leaves were obtained by solvent extraction, as described by Grzeszczuk et al. [48 (link)]. The solvent was a mixture of methanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with distilled H2O (7:3, v/v). Dried leaves were ground in a laboratory mill, then 0.5 g samples were transferred into 50 mL Falcon tubes (Bionovo, Legnica, Poland) and mixed with 40 mL of the mixture. The solutions were then extracted for 30 min in an ultrasonic cleaner (Elmasonic S30H, Elma Schmidbauer GmbH, Singen, Germany) and centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 rpm (Centrifuge 5418 Eppendorf, Warsaw, Poland). The extracts were filtered through 0.22 µm nylon membrane filters (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Three repetitions of each extract were prepared and stored in a freezer at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparation of Clear Biological Fluids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain clear fluids for analyses the samples were prepared as described elsewhere [11 (link)]. Briefly, the samples were transferred into 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm/min for 10 min at 20 °C (Centrifuge 5418 Eppendorf, Warsaw, Poland). The supernatants of the particular type of sample were mixed and filtered through 0.22-µm nylon membrane filters (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). The obtained clear fluids were used for further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized Xylanase Production Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optimized parameters for each factor from the statistical design experiments were implemented for the scaled-up production of the xylanases. The nutrient salt solution was prepared as previously described (“Medium and cultivation”) and supplemented with the optimized wheat bran and ammonium sulphate concentrations. Erlenmeyer flasks (2 l) containing 400 ml of the medium were each inoculated with two 5 mm fungal plugs from a 5-day-old plate culture and incubated at the optimized parameters in a shaker (New Brunswick Innova 44, Germany). Cultured media were removed after the incubation period and the cell-free supernatant was recovered by centrifuging samples at 16,873 × g for 10 min (Eppendorf centrifuge 5418, Germany). Xylanase activity was determined as described in “Xylanase assay”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Xylanase Activity Determination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The selected xylanase-producing isolates (after primary screening) were inoculated into potato dextrose broth and incubated at 30°C for 7 days at 200 rpm in a shaking incubator (New Brunswick Scientific, incubator shaker series, Innova 44). The cultured media were then centrifuged (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5418, Germany) at 1,6873 × g for 10 min. Using sterile pipette tips, 5 mm wells were made on substrate agar plates as prepared above. The supernatants containing the crude enzymes were dispensed into the wells and the plates incubated at 30°C for 2 to 3 days, after which they were stained, destained, and analysed as described previously in 2.2.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and ESI-DMA-MS Analysis of GSH-Au NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GSH-Au NP samples, quenched at 0 s, 2 s and 5 s were analyzed by ESI-DMA-MS. As excess GSH and boric acid would disturb the detection of the Au clusters, the samples were purified prior to ESI-DMA-MS analysis. The dried samples were dispersed in a washing solution consisting of 20 mL methanol, 25 mL 2-propanol and 5 mL of 20 mM aqueous formic acid by bath sonication for 15 min and then four washing steps were performed. In each washing step the samples were centrifuged at 12 000 rpm (RCF: 12 500g) for two minutes using a “Centrifuge 5418” (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was removed and the sediment was dispersed in the washing solution by bath sonication for 5 min. After the last centrifugation step, the sediment was dispersed in 1 mL aqueous solution of 50 mM ammonium acetate and 10 mM ammonia. Hereby, more than 90% of soluble contaminations were removed. These dispersions were finally transferred to gas phase by electrospray ionization, classified by their mass/charge ratio in the electric field and analyzed by MS. The ESI-DMA-MS setup and technique are described in more details by Lübbert et al.37,38 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Curcumin Encapsulation Efficiency Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The encapsulation efficiency (EE) of CUR-LCNPs was determined by comparing the mass of free, non-encapsulated curcumin to the total mass of curcumin [33 (link)]. An equal volume of acetonitrile was added to the CUR-LCNPs to dissolve them and determine the total mass of curcumin. The sample was then vortexed and sonicated. Next, the sample was diluted and analyzed spectrophotometrically (Multiskan Go, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at λ = 424 nm. The mass of non-encapsulated curcumin was determined after an appropriate volume of CUR-LCNPs was centrifuged at 2000× g (Centrifuge 5418, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) and washed thrice with PBS (pH 7.4). Afterward, the supernatant was removed carefully, and the remaining curcumin was mixed with acetonitrile (1:1 v/v) and analyzed as described above. The following Equation (1) was used to calculate the encapsulation efficiency: EE%=totalmassofcurcuminmgmassoffreecurcuminmgtotalmassofcurcuminmg%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phytophthora infestans Infection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 5–6 weeks of growth, the tomato plants were inoculated with 10 μL of the sporangial suspension of P. infestans at four different sites, two on each side of the midrib of the leaf. 96 h post inoculation, infected tomato leaves were excised and then immediately macerated in liquid nitrogen. 100 mg of the crushed powder were vortexed (Multi Reax, Heidolph, Germany), mixed with 1 mL of methanol for 10 min at room temperature, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000× g at 20 °C (Centrifuge 5418, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatants were stored at −20 °C until analysis [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enzalutamide-Loaded Hybrid Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hybrid nanoparticles were prepared based on our previously reported protocol.15 (link) A mass of 50 mg of excipient-free human IgG was dissolved in 0.01 N HCl containing 20 mg of poloxamer-188 and 1 mg of enzalutamide in 1 mL with 10 mg of sodium tripoliphosphate as a carrier to make 10 mL of total solution in a 50 mL beaker. The final concentration of human IgG in each solution amounted to 5 mg/mL. This solution was then slowly titrated with 0.01 N NaOH to bring the pH of the mixture to 7, which is the isoelectric point (pI) of human IgG as determined in our laboratory using isoelectric focusing. The nanoparticles were continuously mixed on a magnetic stirrer for additional 10 min. At the pI, enzalutamide-loaded hybrid nanoparticles were spontaneously precipitated. The colloidal suspension was then centrifuged with a microcentrifuge (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5418) at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The nanoparticles were rinsed with double distilled deionized water before being redispersed in water and snapfrozen using liquid nitrogen. This was then loaded into a freezedryer (Labconco FreezeZone 4.6), and lyophilization was performed for 48 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimizing Flavonoid and Tannin Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The condition of the total flavonoids and total tannins extracts of SHC were determined by RSM in a preliminary experiment. All samples were sifted through 60 mesh, for the total flavonoids, according to the solvent/sample ratio of 15 (mL/g), 50% ethanol, and ultrasonic (Jp-060s ultrasonic bath, Shenzhen, China) at ∼30 °C for 10 min. For the total tannin, according to a solvent/sample ratio of 25 (mL/g), 39% ethanol, and ultrasonically at ∼30 °C for 91 min. These were centrifuged twice using a high-speed centrifuge (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5418, Shanghai, China) at 13,000 rpm. The SHC extract was stored at 4 °C for use in future experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!