Uct 760

Manufactured by United Imaging

Sourced in China, Germany

The UCT 760 is a compact and versatile lab equipment designed for a wide range of applications. It features a high-performance motor and precision controls, enabling accurate and reliable performance. The UCT 760 is built with durable components to ensure long-lasting operation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Umi780, by United Imaging (5 mentions) Brilliance 16p, by Philips (2 mentions) Somatom definition as, by Siemens (2 mentions) Revolution ct, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions) Mx 16 ct, by Philips (1 mentions) Uct550, by United Imaging (1 mentions) Somatom perspective, by Siemens (1 mentions) Brilliance ict scanner, by Philips (1 mentions) Aquilion 16, by Toshiba (1 mentions) Somatom definition as 128, by Siemens (1 mentions) Bright speed, by United Imaging (1 mentions) Uct 510, by United Imaging (1 mentions) Biograph 64, by Philips (1 mentions) Ict 256, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions) Uct s160, by United Imaging (1 mentions) Optima 660, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions) Aquilion tsx 101a, by Toshiba (1 mentions)

Spelling variants of this product

UCT 760 scanner (6 citations) UCT 760 128-slicers (4 citations)

27 protocols using uct 760

Standardized CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The patients were positioned with both arms down. All the images were acquired with a 64‐slice CT scanner (uCT 760, United‐Imaging Healthcare) using a standard protocol: 120 kV tube potential, 180 mA s reference tube current with dose modulation on (AutoDOM, United‐Imaging Healthcare), 0.925 spiral pitch, and 20 mm longitudinal collimation.
The median Dose Length Product of the scan was 453.3 mGy cm (range 200.9–1048.2 mGy cm), and the median CTDI_vol was 16.1 mGy (range 8.7–23.8 mGy).

Jin W., Ma Y., Han D., Xie X., Zhang W., Wu Y, & Zhang G. (2022). Joint application of hybrid iterative reconstruction and adaptive filters on neck‐and‐shoulder CT imaging: A clinical evaluation. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 23(12), e13797.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Preoperative Chest CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Preoperative chest CT examinations were conducted using multidetector-row CT systems at the respective hospitals. Xiangtan Central Hospital employed either the Revolution CT (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) or MX16 CT (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands), while The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University utilized the uCT550 or uCT760 (Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China). The imaging protocol included obtaining images in the supine position, covering the area from the lung apex to below the costophrenic angle, with breath-hold helical scanning. Volumetric CT parameters consisted of a tube voltage of 120 kV, a tube current–time product ranging from 180 to 280 mA, a matrix size of 512 × 512, and image preprocessing. CT image reconstruction was conducted using a standard algorithm, with a layer thickness of 0.55–0.625 mm and layer interval of 0.55–0.625 mm.

Xiao Z., Chen J., Feng X., Zhou Y., Liu H., Dai G, & Qi W. (2024). Use of CT-derived radiomic features to preoperatively identify invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma in solitary pulmonary nodules ≤3 cm. Heliyon, 10(9), e30209.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Lung CT Imaging Protocol for COVID-19 Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Each patient was placed in the supine position on the CT machine (uCT760 or Umi780, United Imaging, Shanghai, China; Precison32, Campo imaging, Shenyang, China) and scanned during the inspiratory phase. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 1 mm and an interval of 1 mm.
Lung CT images were screened by three imaging physicians who were blind to the RT-PCR results and clinical information. The CT images were independently read by two radiologists with more than 5 years’ experience in the diagnosis of chest CT scans. In case of dispute, they discussed and reached a consensus that was reviewed by a senior imaging physician with more than 10 years of experience.

Tu C., Wang G., Geng Y., Guo N., Cui N, & Liu J. (2021). Establishment of a Clinical Nomogram Model to Predict the Progression of COVID-19 to Severe Disease. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 17, 553-561.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Standardized CT Imaging Protocol for Tumor Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All CT studies were performed with contrast agents, and they followed a standardized protocol on one of the three CT systems: Brilliance iCT scanner (Philips Healthcare), uCT 760 (United Imaging), and SOMATOM Perspective (Siemens Healthineers). The main scanning parameters were as follows: tube voltage = 120 kV, automatic tube current modulation (30–70 mAs), pitch = 1.0–1.5. mm, matrix = 512 × 512, slice thickness = 5 mm, field of view 350 × 350 mm. All images were reconstructed to 0.625–1.25-mm thickness. Other findings of imaging studies, such as brain MRI or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, were also reviewed to identify new lesions and assess non-target lesions.

Zheng B., Shin J.H., Li H., Chen Y., Guo Y, & Wang M. (2020). Comparison of Radiological Tumor Response Based on iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 in Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor Therapy. Korean Journal of Radiology, 22(3), 366-375.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

CT Imaging Protocol for Lung Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Patients were scanned either with a 16-detector row CT scanner (Aquilion 16; Toshiba Medical, Tokyo, Japan) or a 128-slice CT scanner (uCT 760; United Imaging, Shanghai, China). The acquisition parameters of the 16-detector row CT scanner were set at 120 kVp of tube voltage, 160 mA maximum automatic tube current modulation, 0.5 s gantry rotation speed, and 16 × 0.5 mm beam collimation. Additionally, the acquisition parameters of the 128-slice CT scanner were set at 120 kV tube voltage, 446 mA maximum uDose^® Intelligent Tube Current Modulation, 64 × 0.5 mm collimation, and 1.5 mm at 1-mm increments. The raw data were reconstructed to 0.5 mm thickness at 0.5 mm intervals using a high-spatial-frequency algorithm for lung parenchyma. Multiplanar reconstructions were performed for the morphological features of lesions and adjacent bronchi. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imaging was performed following intravenous injection of 40–80 mL of contrast medium (Ioversol, 300 mg iodine/mL; Hengrui, Lianyungang, China) at a rate of 3 mL/s with a power injector.

Wu L., P., Mu L., Si M., Xu J., Ciren G, & Cai L. (2021). Application of Multi-Slice Computed Tomography for the Preoperative Diagnosis and Classification of Pulmonary Cystic Echinococcosis. Pathogens, 10(3), 353.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

CT Lung Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All scans were performed with the patient in the supine position during end-inspiration without intravenous contrast on two CT scanners, uCT 760 and uMI 780 scanners (United Imaging). The scanning range was from the apex to lung base. All images were obtained with a standard dose scanning protocol, reconstructed at 1.0 mm slice thickness, with 1 mm increment, 512 mm × 512 mm, and a sharp reconstruction kernel (B_VSHARP_B). Lung window setting was with a window level of − 600 Hounsfield units (HU) and window width of 1500 HU.

Li K., Fang Y., Li W., Pan C., Qin P., Zhong Y., Liu X., Huang M., Liao Y, & Li S. (2020). CT image visual quantitative evaluation and clinical classification of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). European Radiology, 30(8), 4407-4416.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Multidetector CT Pulmonary Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Pulmonary CT was performed using 64-, 256-, and 128-slice multidetector row CT scanners (64: Somatom, Siemens Healthcare; 256: Brilliance-16P, Philips Healthcare; 128: uCT 760, United Imaging Healthcare). CT scans were obtained with the following parameters: 120 kV, adaptive tube current, a matrix of 512 × 512, and a beam collimation of 64 × 0.6 mm², 256 × 0.6 mm², and 128 × 0.6 mm². Non-enhanced CT at a slice thickness of 1.0 mm, 1.0 mm, and 0.625 mm was performed, respectively. Images were captured at window settings that allowed viewing of the lung parenchyma (window level and width, − 600 to − 700 HU and 1200–1500 HU, respectively) and the mediastinum (window level and width, 20–40 HU and 400 HU, respectively). The scanning range covered the area from the height level of the superior aperture of the thorax to the diaphragm.

Fang X., Li X., Bian Y., Ji X, & Lu J. (2020). Radiomics nomogram for the prediction of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. European Radiology, 30(12), 6888-6901.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Fetal Radiation Dose Assessment in CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The study included three clinical CT scanner systems, namely a GE Discovery CT 750 HD scanner 4, 17 , a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Edge scanner 18 , and a the United Imaging Healthcare uCT 760 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
128-slice CT scanner 19 , which had been previously incorporated into the MCNPX Monte Carlo code 20 for calculations of radiation dose of various organs, however, not for pregnant patients. The geometries of the three CT gantries, including the source to detector distance, focal spot size, fan angle, etc., had been taken into account in the simulation of corresponding CT scanners as shown in Figure 2. Simulations of x-ray photon transport were performed to yield dose calculations based on 44 pregnant-female phantoms where the fetal radiation dose refers to the total deposited energy in the fetal body divided by the body weight of the fetus. For each phantom, the simulated energy deposition in 25 fetal organs and maternal body were recorded and used for the radiation dosimetry calculations.
For each patient phantom and for each organ, the simulated radiation doses were averaged across all three simulated CT scanners. The detailed Data processing and correlation analysis methods are provided in Supplemental Materials.

Qu S., Liu H., Xie T., Giger M.L., Quan G, & Zaidi H. (2023). Patient-specific fetal radiation dosimetry for pregnant patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic CT imaging. Medical physics, 50(6).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Unenhanced Chest CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All unenhanced chest CT images was acquired using 3 different CT scanners with ≥ 128 detector rows (Somatom Definition AS + 128, Siemens, Germany; or Erlangen Brilliance 128, Philips, Best, The Netherlands; or uCT760, United Imaging, Shanghai, China). All unenhanced scans were performed in the supine position with 120 kVp, 80–200 mAs. The mediastinal-window (level of 40 HU and width of 400 HU) images were reconstructed with a thickness of 5 mm.

Liu M., Zhang Y, & Liu L.H. (2024). Histogram analysis based on unenhanced CT for identifying thymoma and lymphoma among prevascular mediastinal incidentalomas. Cancer Imaging, 24, 5.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

COVID-19 Imaging Protocol Standardization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

To avoid cross-infection, all patients were scanned on one of three machines according to the time of admission and the location of the ward. The models were uCT 760, United Imaging PET-CT uMI780 and KAIPU CT precision 32. All CT scans were non-enhanced. The model and parameters of the machine are as follows: (A) PET-CT uMI780, 120KV, automatic mAs, layer thickness 1.0 cm, layer spacing 1.0 cm; (B) uCT 760, 120KV, automatic mAs, layer thickness 1.0 cm, layer spacing 1.0 cm; (C) KAIPU CT precision 32, 120KV, automatic mAs, layer thickness 1.1 cm, layer spacing 0.7 cm.

Li W., Fang Y., Liao J., Yu W., Yao L., Cui H., Zeng X., Li S, & Huang C. (2020). Clinical and CT features of the COVID-19 infection: comparison among four different age groups. European Geriatric Medicine, 11(5), 843-850.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!