The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dig labeling kit

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States, Germany

The DIG-labeling kit is a laboratory product developed by Roche. It is designed for the labeling of nucleic acid probes with digoxigenin (DIG) for use in various molecular biology applications. The kit provides the necessary reagents and protocols to facilitate the DIG-labeling process, allowing researchers to generate labeled probes for techniques such as Northern blotting, Southern blotting, and in situ hybridization. The core function of the DIG-labeling kit is to enable the incorporation of the DIG label into nucleic acid samples, enabling their subsequent detection and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

47 protocols using dig labeling kit

1

Dig-labeled RNA probes for in situ hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA probes were created from in vitro transcription of PCR products carrying the T7 RNA polymerase recognition sequence at one end and synthesized by using a digoxigenin (Dig)-labeling kit (Roche). Wing discs of L3 larvae were hybridized with probes overnight at 56 °C using standard procedures and visualized using anti-Dig-AP (1:1,000; Roche). Primers used for generating PCR templates are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Southern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1–3 μg of genomic DNA (gDNA) was digested with SacI (Promega), separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and treated as previously reported (Sambrook and Russell, 2001 ). DNA was transferred onto a Millipore Immobilon-Ny+ Transfer membrane and UV cross-linked. For detection of ethA/R and ethA KO mutants, a 415 bp DIG-labeled probe was amplified using a set of primers that bind approximately 1.5 kb downstream of ethR, 5′-TGA GTT TAG TTG GGA CCT AGG CC-3′and 5′-CTA GAG TCA CAT CAG AAA CAT TTG A-3′. For detection of mshA and double mshA/ethA/R KO mutants, a 600 bp DIG-labeled probe was amplified using a set of primers that bind immediately upstream of mshA, 5′-CCC GTC CAC TCT GAA ATG CTC G-3′ and 5′-ATC AAC CCT GAA CCG TCA TCG TGT-3′. Probe amplifications were done via PCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DIG-labeling kit, Roche). Hybridization and signal detection were performed using a detection kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. EasyHyb (Roche) was used as the pre-hybridization and hybridization solutions, and CSPD (Roche) was used as the detection substrate for chemical luminescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Total RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from stationary phase cultures grown in different media by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform method33 (link) for Northern Blot, and Roche High Pure RNA purification kit for real time PCR, as per manufacturer’s instructions. For northern blots, total RNA was separated on 6% polyacrylamide/6 M urea gels and electroblotted on to the nylon membrane. The RNA was UV cross-linked to the membrane followed by hybridization with PhrD probe, labelled by Digoxygenin-dUTP using DIG-labeling kit as per manufacturer’s instructions (Roche, USA). DNA fragment released with XbaI-PstI digestion from pHERDphrD was used as a template for PhrD probe preparation. The hybridized probes were immunodetected using anti-digoxygenin-AP, Fab fragments and visualized with the chemiluminescence substrate CSPD (Roche, USA) on X-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromosomal Walking and Inverse PCR in Genomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAC filters were hybridized with probes labeled and detected with CDP-Star (GE Healthcare) or DIG-labeling kit (Roche). Positive signals were confirmed by direct PCR with probe-specific primers on the individual clones. BACs of true positives were column-purified from 5 ml cultures, and end-sequenced with M13 Forward and Reverse primers. Each end sequence is designed for a pair of specific primers, which was used to determine the relative locations of overlapping BACs. Primer pairs from both distal ends were selected to label probes for the next round of chromosomal walking. Inverse PCR (Sambrook and Russell 2001 ) and TAIL-PCR (Liu and Whittier 1995 (link)) were performed to identify flanking sequences when no additional BAC clones could be identified. GpMTD1 probes were the same as those used for the GpMTD1 DNA gel-blot analysis (Hamaji et al. 2009 (link)). The PCR product of GPLEUFATG and GPLEURTAA was labeled to screen for LEU1S alleles (Supplemental Material, Table S1). Two gametologs (WDR57 and DRG1) and their flanking regions, which were not obtained in the MT+ BAC assembly, were obtained by genomic PCR using specific primers based on the MT– alleles. The linkage of MT+ DRG1 was determined by recombination scores as described below. Abundant repetitive regions flanking the MT assembly prevented further chromosomal walking to connect directly to autosomal sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Situ Hybridization of Cartilage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed for perichondrium cambium layer markers Lgals1 and cartilage markers Col2a1 and collagen type X alpha 1 Col10a1 in 3‐day‐old rat proximal tibias and in vitro chondrocyte pellets. DNA templates for riboprobe transcription were amplified by PCR from epiphyseal cDNA using custom‐designed primers (Table 1) containing a T7 (for sense probes) or Sp6 (for antisense probes) promoter.
PCR products were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Single‐stranded riboprobes for in situ hybridization were transcribed using DIG Labeling Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) that incorporates a digoxigenin‐ (DIG‐) conjugated uracil every 20 to 25 nucleotides. Labeled RNA probes were purified using Micro Bio‐Spin 30 Columns (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and quantified using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying TRAP mRNA+ Osteocytes in Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TRAP gene expression was studied by in situ hybridization. A gene sequence for rat TRAP [28 (link)] was amplified by conventional PCR using cDNA from rat bone and oligonucleotide forward and reverse primers: rnTRAP.for 5′-ACGCCAATGACAAGAGGTTC-3′, rnTRAP.rev 5′-ACATAGCCCACACCGTTCTC-3′ (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and cloned in a Dual Promoter TA Cloning Kit (Life Technologies). The cloned insert was sequenced to establish the orientation (Seqlab, Göttingen, Germany). A digoxigenin (DIG)–conjugated complementary RNA probe was synthesized using T7 or Sp6 polymerase to yield the probe in the sense or antisense direction (DIG-labeling kit; Roche Diagnostics, Oslo, Norway). Longitudinal sections from the tibial diaphysis (Ovx-D/sham) and femoral diaphysis (experimental rickets) were subjected to hybridization following our established protocol [29 (link)]. TRAP mRNA+ osteocytes were quantified in cortical bone within 4–10 mm from the proximal EMB by point counting in a squared grid. Three sections were examined from each animal and their means compared between the groups. Tibial diaphyses were examined twice with an interclass correlation of p < 0.001 and Cronbach’s alfa of 0.94. Staining of osteoclasts from the femoral metaphysis in healing for 72 h was used as a positive control. The sense probe did not show any staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole Mount in situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole mount ISH was performed, essentially, as previously described [69 ] except BM purple (Roche) was used as the chromogenic substrate. Briefly, plasmids encoding cDNA for mouse Stat3, Scx, MyoG, or Sox9 were linearized and DIG-labeled complimentary probes were generated using a DIG-labeling kit (Roche). As indicated, probes were hybridized overnight and detected using alkaline phosphatase-labeled anti-DIG antibody with subsequent chromogenic substrate development. For sectioning, embryos stained as above were embedded into paraffin wax after clearing in CitriSolv (Fisher Scientific) and sectioned serially at 16μM by microtome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In Situ Hybridization of Drosophila Chitinases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the manufacturer’s instructions for DIG labeling KIT (Roche), we generated digoxigenin (dig)-labeled RNA sense and antisense probes by in vitro transcription of the cht5 cDNA clone obtained from Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (#1135722; FBcl0236609). Further genes/clones: cht2, LD28264; cht3, LP01426; cht6, IP07037; cht 7, LD 45559; cht12, AT18578; idgf1, RE68533; idgf3, RE62596; idgf6, LD34164. The fixed embryos were washed with PBT and then fixed again for 20 min with PBT: 4% formaldehyde (1:1). We washed embryos with PBT/hybridization buffer (1:1 ratio) three times and finally for 60 min at 60 °C. Hybridization occurred at 60 °C ON. We washed embryos intensively with PBT for standard antibody staining (procedure see above). The dig-labeled RNA was detected with an anti-Dig alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (1:500; Fab fragment; sheep), which we visualized accordingly to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Riboprobe Generation and in situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Riboprobes were generated using a DIG-labeling kit (Roche). Two templates were amplified from cDNA and cloned into pBS (KS). The 5′ template including the signal peptide sequence of nbr was amplified with primers (5′-ATGGTACCTCGCAATGAGTGATTTAC-3′) and (5′-TATGGATCCTGCAGTTGGTTCTCTAGT-3′) generating a 467 base pair probe. The 3′ template from the cytoplasmic part of the gene was amplified with the primers, (5′-ACAAGTCGTCGTACAAGGA-3′) and (5′-GACCACCATTCTTGTTTGTAGGCA-3′) generating a 343 base pair probe. The procedure for in situ hybridization was carried out according to [46 (link)]. A sense probe was used as a negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hox Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acr-Hox gene-specific primer design was performed with the sequence assembling software Geneious 6.1.6 (Biomatters Limited) and primers were purchased from Life Technologies Company (Thermo Fischer Scientific). First strand cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription of RNA pooled from representative developmental stages covering the entire larval and early post-metamorphic development (cDNA synthesis kit, #04379012001, Roche Diagnostics). Hox gene sequences were amplified with the gene-specific primers via standard PCR. PCR products were cloned by insertion into pGEM-T easy vectors (#A1360, Promega) and plasmid minipreps were purified with Qia-miniprep kit (#27106, Qiagen). Antisense and sense probes from linearized plasmid sequences were synthesized with a DIG-labeling kit (#11277073910, Roche Diagnostics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!