The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

57 protocols using quikchange method

1

Recombinant GHSR Expression Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For CF expression of GHSR, the pIVEX2.3d vector (biotechrabbit GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany) was used. To avoid translation of the protein starting at the ATG codon of the NcoI site of this plasmid, ATG was mutated to a GCG codon using the QuikChange method from Stratagene and the PfuUltra II fusion HS DNA polymerase (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). The cDNA coding for GHSR was subcloned via NdeI and XmaI (NEB, Frankfurt, Germany) sites into the modified pIVEX2.3d vector using a standard PCR protocol as well as Phusion® High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, Frankfurt, Germany), the forward primer 5’-CGA TAC CAT ATG AAA TCA TCA TCA TCA TCA TGGAACGCGACGCCCAGC-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-CGT ATA CCC GGGTGTATTAATACTAGATTC-3’ (each with the restriction sites in bold letters and the annealing part underlined; purchased from Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). Constructs were validated by sequencing. Large amounts of plasmid DNA with concentrations between 600 and 1000 ng/µl were produced using the QIAGEN Plasmid Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
The expressed proteins consisted of the native amino acid sequence with the N-terminal tag inserted between the start methionine and the native residue Trp2 as well as an additional PGGGS sequence and a hexahistidine tag at the C-terminus (Figure 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All site-directed mutagenesis was carried out using the QuikChange method (Agilent). All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Overexpression and Characterization of E26T/D34M/A150E Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gene encoding E26T/D34M/A150E (synthesized by GenScript, NJ) was cloned into a modified pET28b vector, which contains a C-terminal cleavable deca- rather than hexa-histidine tag. The mutations studied in this work were introduced into the gene encoding E26T/D34M/A150E by the QuikChange method (Agilent Technologies), which were subsequently confirmed by DNA sequencing. For membrane transporter overexpression, the E. coli BL21 (DE3) ΔacrABΔmacABΔyojHI cells53 (link) were transformed with the expression vectors containing the genes encoding the E26T/D34M/A150E variants. The bacteria were cultured in LB media and grew to an OD of 0.6 at 600 nm (OD600), at which point they were induced for protein expression with 0.5 mM IPTG at 30 °C for 4 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transient Expression and Purification of T1r Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transient expression of T1rLBD proteins in S2 cells was carried out by the calcium phosphate method as described previously22 (link), or by using FuGENE HD (Roche) with 1 μg each T1r2aLBD and T1r3LBD expression vectors for 1 × 106 cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were cultivated at 300 K for 4 days. Mutations were introduced using the QuikChange method (Agilent Technologies).
The cell culture supernatant was mixed with ANTI-FLAG M2 affinity gel (SIGMA) and rotated at 277 K. After washing with 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, the proteins retained on the beads were eluted with 2 × SDS–PAGE sample buffer (100 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.002% bromophenol blue, pH6.8), followed by heating at 368 K for 5 min. The eluents were divided into two equal parts, further incubated at 368 K for 5 min with or without 100 mM DTT, and subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by electrophoretic transfer onto membranes, using an iBlot apparatus (Life Technologies). T1rLBDs were detected using anti-DDDDK tag-HRP (1:2,000) (Cat. # PM020-7, Medical and Biological Laboratories) and Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore). The images were obtained using a ChemiDoc Imager (Bio-Rad). The uncropped original images of the blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Hermes Transposition Mechanism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the ability of Hermes to carry out discrete steps of the transposition reaction, several assays were used. To assess cleavage, purified Hermes was incubated with plasmids containing either the full Hermes LE and RE (pHL2577 and variants) or the final 30 bp of each end (pRX1-Her). When mutated ends were used, changes were introduced using the QuikChange method (Agilent). After incubation, DNA was isolated and subjected to restriction digest to generate DNA fragments that could be identified after separation on an agarose gel. Cleavage assays were also carried out using oligonucleotides containing 60 bp of Hermes LE and 11 bp of flanking DNA.
To assess the ability of Hermes to generate hairpins when supplied with a pre- nicked LE, protein was incubated with a 71 bp oligonucleotide containing an intact bottom strand with a nicked top strand. For strand transfer, Hermes was incubated with oligonucleotides representing various lengths of pre-cleaved LE sequence and a pUC19 target plasmid.
For in vitro transposition into pGDV1, nuclear extracts of a Drosophila S2 cell line stably expressing Hermes were incubated with a Hermes donor plasmid and pGDV1. Recovered plasmid DNA was transformed into E. coli and the transposition events characterized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Cloning of Human MPS1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human MPS1 was amplified from human testis cDNA (Marathon cDNA; Takara Bio) using Pfu polymerase (Agilent Technologies). MPS1 expression constructs were made using pcDNA5/FRT/TO vectors (Invitrogen) modified to encode the EGFP or FLAG reading frames. Mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange method (Agilent Technologies). DNA primers were obtained from Invitrogen. siRNA duplexes targeting PPP family phosphatase subunits BUBR1 and MPS1 have been described previously (Zeng et al., 2010 (link); Espert et al., 2014 (link); Hayward et al., 2019 (link)). On-target SMARTPools were obtained from Dharmacon Horizon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Expressing and Characterizing MATE Transporter Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Full-length DinF-BH and NorM-NG were expressed with cleavable hexa- and deca-histidine tags at their C-termini, respectively7 (link),9 (link). Mutations were introduced into the dinF-BH and norM-NG genes by using the QuikChange method (Agilent Technologies) and were confirmed by DNA sequencing7 (link),9 (link). Escherichia coli sBL21 (DE3) ΔacrABΔmacABΔyojHI cells34 (link) were transformed with pET-15b vector containing the inserted genes encoding the DinF-BH and NorM-NG mutants.
The membrane expression levels of DinF-BH and NorM-NG were not affected by the mutations described in this study, as judged by western blot using an antibody against the His-tag (Supplementary Fig. 5). For the western blot, the antibody (Qiagen #34460) was diluted 2,500-fold before being mixed with the transfer membranes, and each sample examined on the gel was derived from cell membranes isolated from 80 µg E. coli BL21 (DE3) ΔacrABΔmacABΔyojHI cells expressing the MATE variants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cloning and Mutagenesis of TfuA and YcaO Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MBP-fusion proteins used in this study were cloned from as reported before12 (link) into the pET28 vector with an N-terminal MBP-His tag. The MtTfuA was cloned into the pETDuet-1 vector with an N-terminal His tag. The AzoTfuA and AzoYcaO were cloned into the first and second multiple cloning sites (MCSs) in pETDuet-1 vector, respectively, with an N-terminal His tag preceding the first MCS. These constructs were used for protein expression and as the templates for site-directed mutagenesis. Mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange method (Agilent) with Q5 Polymerase (NEB). The primers used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table 1. All mutagenesis was verified by DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Homotransfer FRET GCK Sensor Construction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mCerulean fluorescent protein (FP) in a previous two-color FRET sensor17 (link) was replaced with an mVenus FP using NheI and BglII restriction sites to create the homotransfer FRET GCK reporter. Point mutagenesis utilized the QuikChange method (Agilent) with the following primers; GCK(A456V), sense (5′-GGTCTCTGCGGTGGTCTGCAAGAAGGCTT-3′) and antisense (5′-AAGCCTTCTTGCAGACCACCGCAGAGACC-3′); GCK(K414E), sense (5′-CTCGGGTGCAGCTCGTACACGGAGCCA-3′) and antisense (5′-TGGCTCCGTGTACGAGCTGCACCCGAG-3′). The mVenus tandem dimer was constructed by removing GCK from the FRET GCK sensor using the BglII and BamHI restriction sites. The two mVenus FPs were ligated with a 10-amino acid linker sequence (SGLRSPPVAT) remaining between them. DNA sequencing (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ) was used to verify successful construction of all sensors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Site-Directed Mutagenesis using QuikChange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out using the QuikChange method (Agilent). Mutations and all plasmid constructs were confirmed by sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!