The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using ptfe filter

1

Methanol Extraction of Whole Grains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 0.5 g of ground whole grain was extracted with 10 mL of methanol:1 M HCl 85:15 (v/v) and maintained under stirring in the dark for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged at 8000 g for 20 min at 4 °C (Avanti J-25, Beckman Coulter, CA, USA), filtered with a 0.45 μm PTFE filter (VWR International, Fontenay-sous-Boys, Francia), and stored at −20 °C until used. Each extraction was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis of Chromium Cyanide Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation was accomplished by a modification of the literature procedure reported by
Cotton and Murillo et al.43 (link) In a glovebox,
1a·Et2O (100 mg, 0.102 mmol) and TlBF4 (64 mg,
0.21 mmol) were dissolved in CH3CN (15 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight
and then filtered through a PTFE filter (0.2 μm porosity, VWR). To this solution, a
solution of KSCN (22 mg, 0.23 mmol) in CH3CN (5 mL) was added, and a dark green
precipitate formed immediately. The mixture was filtered, and the precipitate was washed
with CH3CN and dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL). The solution
was filtered and layered with n-hexane in a Schlenk tube. After 1 week,
the brownish-green rectangular platelets so-obtained were collected in a glovebox and
washed with n-hexane (65 mg, 64%). Anal. calcd for
C42.4H32.8Cl0.8Cr3N14S2(1b·0.4CH2Cl2, 986.89): C, 51.60; H, 3.35; N,
19.87. Found: C, 51.41; H, 3.45; N, 19.49. IR (ATR):
max (cm–1) 2025m (C≡N),
1605m, 1595s, 1547w, 1463s sh, 1456s, 1420s, 1364s br, 1309m, 1277w, 1153s, 1106w, 1052w,
1013m, 917w, 880m, 856w, 800w, 761s, 737m, 644m.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Polymer Molar Mass Characterization by SEC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molar mass distributions were determined with an Agilent 1260 infinity system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) consisting of an autosampler (Agilent 1260 ALS G1329B), an isocratic HPLC pump (Agilent 1260 Infinity ISO), a PSS-SDV (Polymer Standard Services) precolumn, three PSS-SDV separation columns (8 × 300 mm, particle size 10 µm, pore sizes of 106, 105, and 103 Å) and an RI detector (Agilent 1260 G1362A). The setup was maintained at 35 °C and tetrahydrofuran (THF) was used as the eluent (flow rate of 1 mL·min−1). The system was calibrated via a conventional calibration method using narrowly PMMA standards (PSS, MP = 800 to 1,600,000 g·mol−1) and toluene as internal standard. The molar masses of PMA were obtained using the Mark–Houwink parameters (K = 1.95 × 10−2 mL·g−1, a = 0.660) according to the principle of universal calibration [40 (link),41 (link)]. All polymer samples (4 mg·mL−1) were filtered prior to injection (VWR, PTFE filter, 0.45 µm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lignin Content Analysis by UV-Vis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
100 μL of each sample was diluted 1 : 10 in 50% methanol : water (Honeywell, Chromasolv™) and analysed spectrophotometrically at 280 nm in a 96-well UVStar® plate (Greiner Bio-One) and compared to a standard curve of Sigma Kraft Lignin (Sigma Aldrich, 471003), Fig. S1, to determine the overall aromatic content. Concentrated samples were filtered using a 0.2 μm PTFE filter (VWR) and diluted in 50% methanol : water to obtain a final concentration of 150–175 μg mL−1 lignin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Phenolic Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to analysis, all samples were filtered through a PTFE filter (VWR, Leuven, Belgium). Naringenin and p-coumaric acid were quantified using a Waters Acquity UPLC H-Class system connected to an ACQUITY TUV-detector operating at 30 °C and 290 nm. A Kinetex® 2.6 µm Polar C18 100 Å column (Phenomenex, Utrecht, The Netherlands) was used to separate metabolites using the following method, at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min:
Time (min)Eluent A: 0.1% TFA in water (%)Eluent B: 100% acetonitrile (%)
09010
0.57525
57525
73070
8.53070
109010
Glycerol was quantified on a Shimadzu Prominence-I LC2030c Plus system connected to an RID-20A (Shimadzu) detector operating at 40 °C. A Rezex ROA-Organic Acid H + (8%) – 150 × 7,8 mm column (Phenomenex, Utrecht, The Netherlands) at 60 °C was used to separate metabolites using an isocratic method with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min and 0.005 N H2SO4 in water as eluens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cereulide Extraction from Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were weighed in a 15 ml polypropylene tube (Falcon tubes, VWR International) to achieve a 1/10th dilution and then kept on ice. Cereulide was extracted by using acetonitrile (LC-MS grade, Merck) as described in the ISO 18465 (2017) . An internal marked standard (13C6-cereulide) was added to reach a final concentration of 1.5 ng/ml.
The tube was then vigorously horizontally shaken at room temperature on an Orbital shaker (VXR basic Vibrax, VWR International) for circa 1 h at around 1,800 rpm (until adequate vortexing was achieved). After shaking, the tube was centrifuged (centrifuge Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min at 1,000 G. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.22 μm Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter (PTFE filter, 0.22 μm, 13 mm minispike, VWR International) into a 2 ml amber glass vial (Agilent). The filtered extract was stored at -20°C until the injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Development and Validation of Baclofen Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baclofen reference standards and the impurities A and C were obtained from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), Strasbourg, France. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (> 99% purity), acetonitrile and methanol, HPLC grade (> 99.9% purity), sodium pentanesulfonate (> 99.0% purity), sodium hexanesulfonate (> 98% purity), phosphoric acid and acetic acid were all of analytical grade (> 99% purity) and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, (Darmstadt, Germany). Potassium dihydrogenphosphate for HPLC was purchased from VWR international GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany). Ultra-pure water was freshly produced by a water purification system from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). All solutions were filtered through a 0.2 µm PTFE filter (VWR international GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Biogenic Amines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Supernatants obtained from centrifuged cultures were filtered through 0.2 μm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters (VWR, Barcelona, Spain). BA were derivatized with diethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate (DEEMM) (Sigma–Aldrich). 100 μl of sample were mixed with 175 μl of 1 M borate buffer (1 M boric acid neutralized with NaOH until pH 9.0), 75 μl of methanol (Merck), 2 μl of L-2-aminoadipic acid as internal standard (2 g/L) (Sigma–Aldrich) and 3 μl of DEEMM. The mixture was incubated at 30°C in an ultrasound bath (Selecta, Barcelona, Spain) for 45 min. Samples were then heated at 70°C for 2 h to allow the complete degradation of excess DEEMM and reagent by-products. Samples were filtered through 0.2 μm PTFE membranes (VWR) before injection into the chromatograph system. Samples were diluted, when necessary, with 0.1 N HCl (Merck). BA were separated and quantified by ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (Waters, Milford, MA, United States) with an UPLC®BEH C18 1.7 μm column (Waters), following the method previously described (Redruello et al., 2013 (link)). Empower 2 software (Waters) was used to control the system and to analyze the data. Standards were prepared with agmatine, putrescine dihydrochloride (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), tyrosine and tyramine in Milli-Q water. The BA concentrations provided are the average of three independent cultures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Determination of Molecular Binding Affinities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the binding affinities of the MIP/NIP, rebinding experiments were conducted as follows: to 20 mg of MIP/NIP powder was added 5 mL aliquots of aqueous target/analogue ranging in concentration (0.1–0.7 mM) and the resulting suspension agitated on a rocking table (125 rpm) for 90 min. After agitation, the filtrate (0.45 µm pour size, PTFE filters, VWR, cat number: 514-0065) of each sample was collected and analyzed using a UV-spectrophotometer, analyzing the λmax of the remaining molecular species in solution (Cf). The amount of molecular species bound to the MIP/NIP (Sb) proceeded to be calculated from these observed values and the corresponding binding isotherm plotted. This process was repeated for each of the following species: Amoxicillin, ampicillin, cloxacillin, malachite green, crystal violet, and mordant orange 1.
Note: During the experimentation with malachite green, all samples of crystal violet and mordant orange were diluted (dilution factor 100), ensuring absorbance values within the reliable range on the UV-spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dose-response study of MIP 205 for antibiotics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A dose-response study was constructed by incubating the synthesized dye loaded MIP 205 (40 mg) with 5 mL of aqueous amoxicillin at varying concentrations (0.000–365.0 mg L−1) for 1 min before the filtration (0.45 µm pour size, PTFE filters, VWR, cat number: 514-0065) of the sample. The filtrate proceeded to be analyzed by a UV-spectrophotometer collecting the spectrum for each sample (200–500 nm). The maximum absorbance of each concentration (λmax = 385 nm) was then plotted against the concentration of amoxicillin added, allowing the dose response to graphed. The same process was repeated for the assay in the presence of cloxacillin and ampicillin, testing the selectivity of the assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!