The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using uv 3100pc spectrophotometer

1

Phenolic and Flavonoid Content in Mauritia flexuosa Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolic content (TPC) of the Mauritia flexuosa oil was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method [44 (link),45 (link)]. Briefly, 20.0 μL of a dilute solution of oil in ethanol (10.0 μL/mL and 2.5 μL/mL) was mixed with 100.0 μL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The solution was stirred for 1 min and kept at rest for 4 min. After, 75.0 μL of Na2CO3 (10% w/v) was added and stirred for 1 min. After incubation in the dark for 2 h, at room temperature, the absorbance of the solution and the blank were determined by UV-vis at 750 nm (VWR UV-3100 PC Spectrophotometer). The total phenolic content was calculated from a calibration curve, using gallic acid as standard. The result was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of Mauritia flexuosa oil.
To determine the total content of flavonoids in Mauritia flexuosa oil, the aluminum chloride method was used [45 (link),46 (link)]. Briefly, 20.0 μL of a diluted solution of oil in ethanol (10.0 μL/mL and 2.5 μL/mL) was mixed with 210.0 μL of methanol (80%) and 20.0 μL of 2% AlCl3 was added. The solution was mixed and kept in the dark at room temperature for 30 min, and the absorbance of the mixture was monitored by UV-Vis at 427 nm (VWR UV-3100 PC Spectrophotometer). The total flavonoid content was expressed as milligrams of quercetin equivalents per gram of Mauritia flexuosa oil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analytical Techniques for Natural Product Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel (0.06–0.2 mm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Gel filtration was performed on Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Analytical TLC was performed on Merck pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Preparative HPLC, LaChrom System (Merck Hitachi) equipped with a Phenomenex Jupiter column (10 mm, C18, 300 Å, 250 × 21.1 mm) was used for purification of the compounds. Melting points were measured on B-540 melting point apparatus (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland). UV spectra were recorded on a UV-3100PC spectrophotometer (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 380 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). High Resolution ESI-MS was done on a Micromass AC-TOFmicro mass spectrometer (Micromass, Agilent Technologies 1200 series, Tokyo, Japan). CD spectra were measured on a JASCO J-810 CD spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). Optical rotations were measured on a P-1020 polarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). 1D (1H, 13C) NMR and 2D (COSY, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY) NMR spectra were recorded on an Avance 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA, at 500 MHz (1H) and 125 MHz (13C) at 298 K, using the residual solvent peaks (acetone: δH 2.05, δC 29.84; CDCl3: δH 7.26, δC 77.16) as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cysteine-Peptide Conjugation to Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cysteine-containing
peptides were conjugated to the gold nanoparticles
through a ligand exchange reaction (Scheme 1). All three peptides were prepared at the
same concentration. Briefly, 10 μL of 0.05 mM peptide was mixed
with 1 mL of citrate-GNP (0.05 mg mL–1 or 16.6 pM)
colloid solution. The molar ratio of peptide to GNP was calculated
to be 5.2 × 104:1. After 24 h incubation, the colloidal
solution was centrifuged (10 000 rcf, 12 min) and resuspended
in pure water to remove the excessive and unbound peptides. The peptide-conjugated
gold nanoparticles (peptide-GNPs) were reconstituted in 1 mL of water
and stored at 4 °C for later use.
Nanoparticle characterization
was carried out by UV–vis
absorption, dynamic light scattering, and zeta-potential measurements.
UV–vis measurements were performed using a UV-3100PC spectrophotometer
(VWR International, Radnor, PA), coupled with a Deuterium-Tungsten
halogen lamp. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements
were performed using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS system (Malvern, Worcestershire,
U.K.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biomineralization Kinetics of Calcium Carbonate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two solutions were prepared in ultrapure water (Milli‐Q). In solution A, urea (Sigma–Aldrich), calcium chloride dihydrate (Sigma–Aldrich) and hydrochloric acid (Sigma–Aldrich) were dissolved. Solution B contained urease/phosphate (from Canavalia ensiformis (Jack bean) type III, Sigma–Aldrich, 31 430 u g−1, containing phosphate 0.17 mg/u). For experiments in the cuvette, one mL of B was added to one mL of A under constant stirring using a magnetic stirrer (HI‐190M) with a Spinfin® stirrer bar. Experiments were performed at room temperature (20±2 °C). The pH was monitored using a pH microelectrode (Mettler Toledo and Pico Data logger software) and images were taken using a PixeLINK® camera and analyzed using ImageJ or MATLAB. Turbidity measurements were obtained using a VWR UV‐3100PC spectrophotometer. The precipitate was filtered, rinsed with doubly deionized water and air dried. Raman spectroscopy was performed on a Thermo ScientificTM DXRTM Raman microscope using a green laser (λ=532 nm), at 5 mW. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images were recorded by a Hitachi S‐4700 field emission scanning electron microscope, at 10 kV. Optical microscope images were produced from an aqueous sample of solution collected after oscillations ceased using a Leica TCS SP8 Confocal Microscope. For more details, see the supplementary information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Methylene Blue Adsorption on Ball-Milled Zeolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dye adsorption capacity of the ball-milled zeolite particles was examined using a 20 ppm solution of methylene blue dye. Initially, 0.05 g of each sample was added to 100 mL of the methylene blue solution with a pH of 7.5. Next, the flasks were shaken at 125 rpm and 25 °C for 1 h. After that, the absorbance of methylene blue in the supernatant was measured at 664 nm using a UV-3100PC spectrophotometer (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). Adsorption capacity (Q) in mg of dye adsorbed per gram of zeolite powder was calculated as follows: Q=(coc)×Vm
where, co is the initial concentration of the dye solution (ppm), c is the dye concentration after adsorption, V is the solution volume (L), and m is the adsorbent mass (g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic-Induced Morphological Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial suspensions were diluted to McFarland 0.5 based on OD600 measurements using a UV-3100 PC Spectrophotometer (VWR, Herlev, Denmark) and subsequently diluted in cation adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth to a final bacterial cell suspension of approximately 1 × 105 bacteria/mL. Sensititre® NF plates (Thermo Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark) were used to examine antibiotic-induced morphological changes. The Sensititre NF plates contain a total of 23 antibiotics of which 12 are β-lactam antibiotics or β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ampicillin/sulbactam 2:1 ratio, aztreonam, carbenicillin, cefepime, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam constant four, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid constant two). Bacteria-antimicrobial suspensions were transferred immediately from the Sensititre® plates to flat-bottomed Nunc Edge 96-well plates, since the oCelloScope system (Philips BioCell, Allerød, Denmark) cannot measure round bottom plates. No discrepancies were associated with this step. All experiments on reference strains and clinical isolates were carried out in biological triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determining Total Phenolic Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determining TP was based on the Folin–Ciocalteu method. Briefly, 1 g of sample was mixed with 5 mL methanol, 0.5 mL HCl 5N, NaF 2 mM and centrifugated at 12,857× g, 4 °C, 10 min using an Eppendorf centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). From the supernatant, 250 µL were mixed in a 25 mL volumetric flask with 1.25 mL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and stored in a darker place for 8 min. Afterward, 3.75 mL Na2CO3 with a concentration of 7.5% was added and further stored for 120 min [47 (link)]. Absorbance was measured at 765 mm in a UV-3100PC spectrophotometer (VWR, Leuven, Belgium). The total phenolic content was expressed as mg of gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) equivalents (GAE) per 100 g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spectroscopic Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points were recorded on B-540 melting point apparatus (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland). Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel (0.06–0.2 mm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) deactivated with 3% aq. oxalic acid. Gel filtration was carried out on Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Analytical TLC was performed on Merck pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). UV spectra were recorded on a UV-3100PC spectrophotometer (VWR international, Darmstadt, Germany). High Resolution ESI-MS was done on a Micromass AC-TOF micro mass spectrometer (Micromass, Agilent Technologies 1200 series, Waldbronn, Germany). Optical rotations were measured on a P-1020 polarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). CD spectra were measured on a JASCO J-810 CD spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 380 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). 1D NMR and 2D (COSY, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY) NMR spectra were recorded on an Avance 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) at 500 MHz (1H) and 125 MHz (13C) at 298 K using the residual solvent peaks as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Bi Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM and EDS measurements were carried out on a Philips XL30 FEG SEM with an attached EDAX CDU LEAP EDS detector. To analyse template-freed Bi nanotubes, the membranes were dissolved using dichloromethane (DCM). This was done by placing the sample on a Si wafer piece and applying a drop of DCM to fix it, before placing it in DCM for several hours until the solvent was evaporated.
TEM measurements were performed on 70 nm thin microtome cuts of the metallised membranes. Prior to cutting, samples were embedded in Araldite® 502 resin (polymerization for 16 h at 60 °C). The obtained slices were placed on Cu-grids and analysed in a FEI CM20 TEM at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV.
XRD analysis was carried out on as-fabricated samples using a Seifert XRD 3003 PTS diffractometer with a Cu anode (40 kV, 40 mA). The Cu Kα radiation (λ ≈ 154.2 pm) is separated by a graphite monochromator and collimated on the secondary side using a long Soller slit. All measurements were performed in θ/2θ-geometry.
All UV-Vis measurements were performed on a VWR UV-3100PC spectrophotometer using Quartz-cuvettes. Due to their strong absorbance in the UV-range, Bi(iii) containing solutions were diluted with water in a 1 : 100 ratio prior to the measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Spectroscopic Analysis of DyP4 Enzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified DyP4 stored at − 80 °C was thawed and transferred to a quartz cuvette. UV–visible spectra were collected using a UV-3100PC spectrophotometer (VWR; Lutterworth, UK). Spectra between 250–800 nm were recorded at ambient temperature for all proteins in buffer C, typically at concentrations of 3–6 μM. DyP4 protein concentration was calculated based on absorbance at 280 nm, measured using the BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf; Stevenage, UK), and an extinction coefficient of 29,575 M−1 cm−1 (calculated using ProtParam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!