The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

71 protocols using vhx 5000 digital microscope

1

Microscopic Investigation of Preserved Animals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preserved animals were embedded in Berlese mountant for microscopic investigation in transmitted light. Drawings were made with an Olympus BH-2 Microscope equipped with a drawing attachment. These drawings were first scanned, then processed, and digitized with the free and open-source vector graphics editor Inkscape (https://inkscape.org).
For photographic documentation, specimens were air-dried and photographed in reflected light with a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope.
Morphological terminology used in this paper follows that of Grandjean (1953) and Norton and Behan-Pelletier (2009).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Impala Larynx

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For investigation of the peculiar vocal keel of male impala, frontal and sagittal samples of the macroscopic sections 2–5 of the right larynx half were taken and processed histologically (Fig. 26). We used Haematoxylin‐Eosin staining for a general overview, Azan staining for collagen fibres and Elastica Van Gieson staining for elastic fibres. Photographs of representative histological slides were taken with a Keyence VHX‐5000 Digital Microscope (Keyence Deutschland, Neu‐Isenburg, Germany) using a VH‐Z00R, RZ‐50, Zoom 5‐50x lens. Adobe photoshop version CS4 was used to process the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standard Vertebrate Paleontology Specimen Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All materials herein were collected by Denver Museum of Nature & Science field crews during the 2014 and 2016 field seasons under United States Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) permit NM14-04S. Specimens were bulk collected in matrix using standard shovels and pick-axes, placed into 15-gallon plastic bags and transported to the Denver Museum of Nature & Science for wet screen-washing and sorting via the methods outlined in Cifelli, Madsen & Larson (1996) , and identification. Specimens were measured and photographed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County using a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope. Scanning electron micrographs of the specimens were produced using a Hitachi S-3000 N scanning electron microscope at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. All specimens described in this study are housed in the Earth Sciences Vertebrate Paleontology collections at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
Anatomical terminology: We follow the recommendations of Richter (1994) , Evans & Searle (2002) , and Smith & Dodson (2003) , regarding dental anatomical terminology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cave Beetle Morphometric Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The beetle specimens were collected by using an aspirator inside the cave, and kept in 55% ethanol before study. Dissections and observations were made under a Leica S8AP0 microscope. Dissected genital pieces, including the median lobe and parameres of the aedeagus, were glued onto small transparent plastic plates and pinned under the specimen they belonged to. Habitus pictures were taken by means of a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope. Genital pictures were taken using a Canon EOS 40D camera connected to a Zeiss AX10 microscope, and then stacked and processed by means of Adobe Photoshop CS5 software. Distribution maps created using Mapinfo software.
The length of the body was measured from the apex of the right mandible (in open position) to the elytral apex; the width of the body was taken as the maximum width of the elytra.
Abbreviations of other measurements used in the text are as follows:
HLm

length of head including mandibles, from apex of right mandible to occipital suture

HLl

length of head excluding mandibles, from front of labrum to occipital suture

HW

maximum width of head

PrL

length of prothorax, along the median line

PnL

length of pronotum, as above

PrW

maximum width of prothorax

PnW

maximum width of pronotum

PfW

width of pronotum at front

PbW

width of pronotum at base

EL

length of elytra, from base of scutellum to elytral apex

EW

maximum width of combined elytra

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging Techniques for Root Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Low-magnification images of ink-stained roots were acquired with an Epson Perfection flatbed scanner (Epson UK, Hemel Hempstead, UK) using default settings and a resolution of 3200 dots per inch (Fig. S2). High-magnification images were acquired with a VHX-5000 digital microscope (Keyence, Milton Keynes, UK) equipped with a 50-200× zoom lens set to 200× magnification, using transillumination mode and focus stacking. Images of M. truncatula arbuscules were obtained with an Axio Imager M2 (Zeiss, Germany) microscope equipped with a 64× NA 1.4 oil immersion objective lens using differential interference contrast (DIC) illumination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopic Imaging of Plant Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Low-magnification images of ink-stained roots were acquired with an Epson Perfection flatbed scanner (Epson UK, Hemel Hempstead, UK) using default settings and a resolution of 3200 dots per inch (Fig. S2). High-magnification images were acquired with a VHX-5000 digital microscope (Keyence, Milton Keynes, UK) equipped with a ×50-200 zoom lens set to ×200 magnification, using transillumination mode and focus stacking. Images of M. truncatula arbuscules were obtained with an Axio Imager M2 (Zeiss) microscope equipped with a ×64 numerical aperture (NA) 1.4 oil immersion objective lens using differential interference contrast illumination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sclerotia Germination and Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brown sclerotia were found in the piles of egg within nests of R. labralis in Xi’an, China, in May 2014 (Fig. 1A). The sclerotia were soaked in a solution of sodium hypochlorite (approximately 1% active chlorine) for 10 min, this step was repeated three times, and then the sclerotia were rinsed with sterilized distilled water three times. Five surface-sterilized sclerotia were cultured in five Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 27 °C for 20 days. The sclerotia germination, the production of new sclerotia, and the diameter of the fungal colonies were recorded every two days using VHX-5000 Digital Microscope (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Imaging Haller's Organ Posterior Capsule

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Haller’s organ posterior capsule was imaged with a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope using epi-illumination with polarized light and a VH-Z500R 500X-5000X objective (Keyence Corporation, Elmwood Park, NJ, USA). A Woodpecker UDS-J ultrasonic dental scaler (Guilin Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., Guilin, China) was modified for micro-etching of the cuticle to remove the cover from the Haller’s organ posterior capsule for imaging. The stainless-steel tip supplied by the manufacturer was sharpened mechanically with a hard Arkansas whetstone wet with mineral oil, and then further electropointed in a solution containing 34 ml 98% sulfuric acid, 42 ml 25% orthphosphoric acid and 24 ml deionized water. A 6 VDC source was used with the variable resistance adjusted to control the rate of etching so that a sharp, polished tip could be obtained [18 (link)]. It was furthermore necessary to reduce the power supplied to the ultrasonic generator handpiece by placing a 3 KΩ, 5W resistor in series with it. The handpiece with sharpened tip was fixed to a micromanipulator to perform manually controlled etching of the cuticle covering of the Haller’s organ posterior capsule.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Keyence VHX 5000 Microscopy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The photographs and measurements were acquired using a Keyence VHX 5000 Digital Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenotypic Analysis of A. adeninivorans Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenotype of A. adeninivorans G1212/YRC102, G1212/YRC102-AYNI1-AGDC1-6H and G1234 [Δagdc1] was investigated. For this purpose, strains were cultivated on agar plates containing YMM-glucose-NaNO3 at 30°C for 48 h. Colony morphology was investigated using a VHX-5000 Digital Microscope (KEYENCE Deutschland GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany). For detailed analysis, a FESEM S 4100 device (Hitachi High-Technologies Europe GmbH, Krefeld, Germany) was used. Fragments of agar plates containing colonies were dried in 30°C, attached to carbon-coated aluminum sample blocks and gold-coated in an Edwards S150B sputter coater (Edwards High Vacuum Inc., Clevedon, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!