The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using cfi75 lwd 16x w

1

In Vivo Calcium Imaging of Mouse Neuronal Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After habituation and training, mice were used for Ca2+ imaging. Multiphoton fluorescence microscope (Femtonics, Budapest, Hungary) with a 16× NA 0.8 water-immersion objective (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) or with a 20× NA 0.8 water-immersion objective (XLUMPLFLN20XW, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used for Ca2+ imaging in vivo. Ti:Sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra, Coherent, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 920 nm was used to excite the fluorescence of GCaMP6f. Fluorescence signal from a brain area of 600 × 600 or 175 × 175 µm2 (512 × 512 pixels) was recorded in resonant scanning mode at 30 frames/s. The signal was filtered with a 520/60 nm bandpass filter (Semrock, Rochester, NY, USA) and then detected with a GaAsP photomultiplier (H11706P-40, Hamamatsu, Japan). Simultaneously, autofluorescence was filtered with a 650/100 nm bandpass filter and detected with a second identical photomultiplier. Several imaging sessions of 10 min were carried out for each mouse. In parallel with Ca2+ imaging, the animal movements on the platform were monitored with locomotion-tracking software (Neurotar, Helsinki, Finland). All sessions were video recorded in infrared light. The experimental session did not exceed 2 h per mouse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating RBC-aided WFLM Imaging Depth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PM) was employed to validate the imaging depth of RBC-aided WFLM. The imaging was performed with a custom-built 2PM system50 (link), equipped with a tunable femtosecond laser (Chameleon Discovery NX, Coherent Inc, USA). In this study, 940 nm excitation wavelength was selected for FITC excitation. A 16× water-immersion objective (CFI75 LWD 16X W, NA = 0.8, Nikon, Japan) was used for the validation experiment. 3D structural imaging was achieved by 2D lateral scanning with galvo mirror and axial scanning of the objective with a piezo motor-driven linear stage at 2 µm step size. Backscattered fluorescence was collected by the same objective, passing through a band-pass filter (535/50 nm, Semrock, USA), and then focused on the photomultiplier tube (H9305-03, Hamamatsu, Japan). Image acquisition was performed with ScanImage (r3.8.1, Janelia Research Campus)51 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Two-Photon Imaging of Neuronal Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four weeks after the surgery, mice were imaged under an Ultima IV two-photon microscope from Bruker/Prairie Technologies56 (link), with a Nikon 16 × 0.8 NA water-immersion objective (model CFI75 LWD 16XW). The fluorescence of GCaMP6f and jRGECO1a was excited at 999 nm with a Spectra-Physics InSight DeepSee laser. All optical filters mentioned in the following description of the two-photon microscope are by Chroma Technology Corporation: after the collected light is reflected towards the detection unit by the main dichroic filter (ZT473-488/594/NIRtpc), the signal light enters the detector house (four channels), passing a ZET473-488/594/NIRm filter, that is shielding the photomultiplier tubes from reflective light. Inside the detector house, the light is then split into two fractions separated at a wavelength of 560 nm by a dichroic filter (T560lpxr). The green light (GCaMP6f) is further guided by a secondary dichroic beam splitter at 495 nm (T495lpxr) and filtered by a ET525/50m-2p bandpass filter, whereas the red light (jRGECO1a) is similarly guided by a secondary beam splitter at 640 nm (T640lpxr) and subsequently filtered by a ET595/50m-2p bandpass filter. The emitted photons were detected with Peltier cooled photomultiplier tubes (model 7422PA-40 by Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.). Images (512 × 512 pixels) were acquired at 30 Hz in layer 2/3 of barrel cortex.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Two-Photon Imaging of Neural Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon (2P) imaging was performed on a Thorlabs Bergamo resonant scanning microscope with 920 nm excitation via a titanium:sapphire femtosecond laser (Chameleon Vision II, Coherent). A 1.1-NA 25× objective lens was used (CFI75 Apochromat 25XC W, Nikon Instruments) except for patching, where a 0.8-NA long-working distance 16× lens (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon Instruments) was used to allow space for the patch pipette to approach the tissue under the microscope. The emission was split by a dichroic mirror into two channels: the green channel used a 525/50 nm filter, and the red channel used a 625/90 nm filter, before being collected by two photomultiplier tubes. ScanImage software (Vidrio) was used to control the microscope and acquire imaging data. Imaging power was kept between 20–70 mW depending on depth and field of view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Two-Photon Calcium Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
a commercially available two-photon microscope was used (A1 MP, Nikon), equipped with a 16x water-immersion objective (N.A.=0.8, WD=3 mm, CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon), and controlled by NIS-Elements software (Nikon). GCaMP6s was excited at 940 nm using a Ti:Sapphire laser system (~60 fs laser pulse width; Chameleon Vision-S, Coherent). Emitted photons were collected using gated GaAsP photomultipliers (H11706-40, Hamamatsu). Several individual tif series were recorded by resonant scanning at a frame rate of 15 Hz for a total 20–40 minutes per imaging session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Two-Photon Imaging of Neural Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical setup for two-photon imaging was composed of a pulsed laser source (Chameleon Ultra, 80 MHz repetition rate tuned at 920 nm, Coherent) and Bruker Ultima Investigator equipped with 6 mm raster scanning galvanometers, movable objective mount, 16x/0.8 NA objective (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon, Milan), and multi-alkali photomultiplier tubes. Laser beam intensity was adjusted using a Pockel cell (Conoptics Inc, Danbury). Laser beam power at the objective outlet was 90–110 mW. GCaMP6f or TdTomato emission signal was collected by the photomultipliers after band-pass filtering (525/70 nm) and digitalized in 12 bits. Imaging sessions were conducted in raster scanning mode. t-series were motion corrected using an open-source implementation of up-sampled phase cross-correlation 71 (link), 80 (link) and the t-series median projection was used as reference frame. One or two weeks after surgery the animals were handled by the operator for a minimum of two days and habituated to the imaging setup. Starting from the second session, the animals were head-restrained for a progressively increasing amount of time, reaching 1 hour in approximately one week. Mice were free to run on a custom 3D printed wheel. Experimental sessions lasted approximately one hour. After each session, animals were returned to their home cages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Calcium Imaging of Transgenic Larval Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For zebrafish experiments, transgenic larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) expressing GCaMP7a calcium indicator under control of GAL4-UAS system and huc promoter (Tg(huc:GAL4);Tg(UAS:GCaMP7a))43 (link)–45 (link) with a Casper (mitfa(w2/w2);mpv17(a9/a9))46 (link) mutant were imaged at 3–4 days postfertilization.
The larvae were paralyzed by bath incubation with 0.25 mg ml−1 of pancuronium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich) solution for 2 min (ref. 47 (link)). After paralysis, the larvae were embedded in agar using a 2% low melting point agarose (TopVision) in a Petri dish. The dish was filled with standard fish water after solidifying the agarose gel. Specimens were imaged using a point-scanning confocal microscopy system (NIS-Elements AR v.5.11.01, C2 Plus, Nikon) equipped with a ×16 0.8 NA water dipping objective lens (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon). The imaging was performed using a 488 nm excitation laser (0.15–0.75 mW). All animal experiments involving zebrafish conducted for this study were approved by the IACUC of KAIST (KA-2021-125).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Two-Photon FRET Imaging of cAMP Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging of FRET was performed on a Nikon A1R upright confocal microscope using the NIS Elements Confocal software package v5.20.02. Images were acquired through a 16x dipping objective (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon). mTurquoise (FRET donor) was excited by tuning a TiSapphire IR laser to 850 nm for two-photon imaging, with 470 – 500 nm (mTurquoise; FRET donor, CFP channel) and 525 – 575 nm (cp173Venus-Venus; FRET acceptor, YFP channel) bandpass emission filtration. To visually locate Rapgef3-expressing cells, the POA was briefly exposed to blue epifluorescence of 488 nm for less than a minute. For dark-treated and drug-treated cells, images were taken every minute. For 405 nm-laser illuminated cells, images were taken every other minute, with one minute of continuous 405 nm photostimulation in between. Drugs were bath-applied at the 45 minute mark of the experiment. 20 μM forskolin NKH477 (344281, EMD Millipore), 200 μM IBMX (02195262-CF, MP Biomedicals), and 10 μg/mL digitonin (D141, Sigma Aldrich) were applied according to experimental timepoints. ΔF (change in FRET) is presented as the ratio of donor emission to acceptor emission (CFP/YFP). Images were processed and quantified using NIS Elements AR v5.20.00, ImageJ Ratio Plus plugin, and MATLAB 2018a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Two-Photon Imaging of Neural Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon (2P) imaging was performed on a Thorlabs Bergamo resonant scanning microscope with 920 nm excitation via a titanium:sapphire femtosecond laser (Chameleon Vision II, Coherent). A 1.1-NA 25× objective lens was used (CFI75 Apochromat 25XC W, Nikon Instruments) except for patching, where a 0.8-NA long-working distance 16× lens (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon Instruments) was used to allow space for the patch pipette to approach the tissue under the microscope. The emission was split by a dichroic mirror into two channels: the green channel used a 525/50 nm filter, and the red channel used a 625/90 nm filter, before being collected by two photomultiplier tubes. ScanImage software (Vidrio) was used to control the microscope and acquire imaging data. Imaging power was kept between 20–70 mW depending on depth and field of view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vivo Imaging of Microglia Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure for thin skull preparation, imaging, spine and microglia analyses were performed as described previously (Davalos et al., 2005 (link); Xu et al., 2009 (link)). Imaging was performed on a Bruker Ultima Investigator 2P microscope equipped with a Spectra-Physics Mai Tai laser operating at 940 nm. Spine image stacks were acquired using a 16x/0.8 NA water immersion objective (CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon Instruments) at 12x optical zoom with z-step = 1 μm and analyzed using ImageJ. For microglial imaging, a time series of a single image plane was acquired with a 40x/0.8 NA lens at 4x optical zoom at an interval of 10 s for 25 min and analyzed using IMARIS. Typically, 7–11 terminal tips were analyzed per cell. Terminal tip length was calculated by measuring the distance from the tip to the first node using the IMARIS semi-automatic tracer function every 5 min. Net length change was calculated by summing the difference in length between subsequent timepoints for each terminal tip across 25 min. Absolute length change was calculated by summing the absolute value of the difference in length change between subsequent time points for each terminal tip across 25 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!