The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer is a laboratory instrument used to measure the absorption or transmission of light in the ultraviolet and visible regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is designed to quantify the concentration of chemical substances in a sample by analyzing the amount of light absorbed or transmitted at specific wavelengths.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

28 protocols using ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer

1

Solubility and Dissolution Kinetics of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AP and AP-Nico crystals (10 mg, respectively) were determined by suspending them in 25 mL of distilled water and placing them in a 50-mL round bottom flask with glass stoppers. The suspensions were kept at different temperatures of 298 K and 310 K and stirred at 100 rpm using a magnetic stirrer. After 72 h, the sample concentration was measured at 342 nm by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation of Japan), and the interference of suspension was filtered using a 0.22-μm microfiltration membrane.
Solubility studies: Solubility studies were undertaken on parent AP and AP-Nico pharmaceutical cocrystal in NaAc-HAc buffer and stirring the slurry in a thermostated (310 K) vessel, with a magnetic stir bat at 100 rpm. The suspension was sampled at specific time points (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 min), and filtered using a 0.22-μm microfiltration membrane. The concentration of AP and Ap-Nico crystals was determined by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Company, Japan) from the slope of absorption and known concentration. Absorbance was measured at 342 nm where no interference of the conformer occurs. And the dissolution rate was obtained according to the cumulative release formula:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Flavonoids in C. nutans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The flavonoid content of C. nutans was evaluated according to aluminum chloride assay [37 (link)]. The 1 mL of each extract was transferred into 10-mL volumetric flasks containing 4 mL of 80% methanol. Then, 0.3 mL of sodium nitrite (NaNO2) solution (1:5, w/v) was added to the flasks and allowed to stand for 6 min at room temperature. Next, 0.3 mL of aluminum chloride (AlCl3) solution (1:10, w/v) was added into the mixtures and kept for 6 min at room temperature. Finally, 2 mL of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution (1 M) was mixed and kept for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance reading of yellow mixtures was measured at 510 nm by ultraviolet-visible (UV) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Quercetin was used as a standard for the calibration curve, and the samples were expressed as mg quercetin/g plant dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Phenolics in C. nutans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of phenolics, from the extract of C. nutans, was evaluated by using the Folin–Ciocalteau reagent-based assay, according to Barku [74 ] with slight modification. A 5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteau reagent was added to the 200 µL of samples, and the solutions were allowed to stand for 10 min at 25 °C. Later, 4 mL of sodium carbonate was added into the solutions, and the solutions were kept in total darkness for 20 min at room temperature. The absorbance reading of the blue color mixture was measured at 765 nm using an ultraviolet-visible (UV) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Gallic acid was used as a standard for the calibration curve, and the samples were expressed as mg GAE/g plant dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for C. nutans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant activity of the aqueous methanol extract of C. nutans was evaluated using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, based on the electron transfer reaction between DPPH reagent and the plant extract according to the method [77 (link)]. A 0.2 mM solution of DPPH in pure methanol was prepared, and 2 mL of this solution was added to 2 mL of all extracts at various concentrations. The mixtures were shaken gently and allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance for both positive control (DPPH solution) and samples was measured at 517 nm against methanol as a blank using an ultraviolet-visible (UV) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The inhibition percentage of the absorbance was calculated as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Activity of OTC@SA/pNIPAAm Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the OTC@SA/pNIPAAm hydrogels, gram-positive bacteria species E. coli BL21 were used as a model. E. coli BL21 were grown overnight in the Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid medium at 37 °C and harvested at the exponential growth phase via centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and then discarded the supernatant. Then, the bacteria were resuspended in fresh medium. The bacterial concentration was determined by measuring the optical density (OD) at a wavelength of 600 nm. Further, the diluted bacteria solution (200 μL, 1 × 105 CFU mL−1) was added with the OTC@SA/pNIPAAm to reach a final concentration of 50 μg/mL into 96-well plate, incubated at 37 °C. Three sets of the same solution as described above are prepared in parallel. Three controls were performed in parallel by the medium with OTC, SA, and the only medium, respectively. Finally, the concentrations of bacteria solution were tested by measuring the OD at a wavelength of 600 nm at regular time. The antibacterial activities of OTC@SA/pNIPAAm were evaluated by Ultraviolet-Visible (UV) Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at OD 600 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Oxidative Stress Markers in Frozen Testes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen testicular tissues were put into 9-fold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), dissected into small pieces and homogenised in cold saline. We measured the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as an indicator of LPO and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione-peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT) as described earlier by Eken et al. (15 (link)) using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at the following absorbances: 532 nm for MDA, 505 nm for SOD, 340 nm for GPx, and 240 nm for CAT. MDA levels were expressed in nmol/mg protein, and antioxidant enzyme activities in U/mg protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dissolution Assay for Losartan Potassium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 10 tablets was weighed and powdered. The quantity of powder equivalent to 100 mg of losartan potassium was dissolved in 100 ml of 0.1N HCl (pH1.2). Mechanical shaking was done to dissolve the powdered material in 0.1N HCl (pH1.2). Then the solution was filtered, diluted suitably and analyzed using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) at 234 nm.[13 ]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Entrapped Drug Loading in Nanostructured Lipid Carriers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
% EE of ZT-loaded NLCs was indirectly determined after centrifugation through measurement of the amount of un-entrapped ZT in the clear supernatant.22 (link) The prepared NLCs were centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 90 min. The obtained supernatant was filtered through 0.45 Millipore filter (Bedford, MA, USA) of pore size 0.45 μm (Berlin, Germany) and the absorbance of this clear supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically (Ultraviolet-Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV-150-02, Sersakusho, Ltd, Kyoto, Japan)) at the predetermined λmax (282 nm) after suitable dilution with 0.1 N HCl of pH 1.2 similar to the standard curve. Plain NLCs were similarly treated and the obtained supernatant was used as a blank. The % EE was determined using equation 1:
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage[substack]{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\DeclareFontFamily{T1}{linotext}{}
\DeclareFontShape{T1}{linotext}{m}{n} {linotext }{}
\DeclareSymbolFont{linotext}{T1}{linotext}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\mathLINOTEXT}{linotext}
\begin{document}
$$\% EE\, = \,{{Amount\,of\,entrapped\,drug} \over {{\rm{Total}}\,{\rm{amount}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{drug}}}}\,x\,100$$
\end{document}
Where:
Amount of entrapped drug = Total drug amount – unentrapped drug amount
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Grape Pomace Polyphenol Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total polyphenol contents of grape pomace extracts and purified extracts were determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method [58 ,59 ]. Briefly, 20 µL of sample was mixed with 1.58 mL water and 100 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. After 8 min, 300 µL of 20% sodium carbonate solution was added. The mixture was vortexed for 10 s and then incubated at 40 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 765 nm using ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). Total polyphenolic contents of samples were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg L−1 of bulk solution. It is important to note that individual polyphenols can show different gallic acid equivalency [60 (link),61 ]. Although two different mixtures of polyphenols result in the same GAE, the distribution of the individual polyphenols in a given mixture can significantly differ from the other mixture. Therefore, the composition of the grape pomace extract and recovered polyphenols were further characterized via HPLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of DOX and VCR in NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For DOX, the tested sample was added to 1 mL deionized water (pH 7.5) and treated with a digital control ultrasonic cleaner for 15 min. After that, the dispersion was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 10 min at 4°C with a refrigerated micro-centrifuge. The concentration of DOX in water phase was compared against a calibration curve obtained at 480 nm with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
TPGS-PLGA-VCR NPs, CS-ALG-DOX@TPGS-PLGA NPs, CS-ALG@TPGS-PLGA-VCR NPs, or CS-ALG-DOX@TPGS-PLGA-VCR NPs (2 mg) were dissolved in dichloromethane (1 mL), and then ultrasonic method was used to disrupt the NPs. After sonication for 20 min, dimethyl sulfoxide (8 mL) was added to dissolve VCR or/and DOX fully. Then, the dispersion was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 10 min at 4°C with a refrigerated micro-centrifuge, and the supernatant and precipitate were retained, respectively. The supernatant was collected to analyze the concentration of VCR at 298 nm or/and DOX at 480 nm with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer. LE and EE were calculated as listed below formulas (1) and (2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!