The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using chelex solution

1

Microsatellite Genotyping of An. darlingi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was prepared from each mosquito with 5% Chelex solution (BioRad, Hercules, USA). Nine microsatellite loci were genotyped for 175 An. darlingi specimens by PCR using fluorescently labeled reverse primers (FAM, NED, or HEX; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) previously described [20 , 27 (link)]. Amplified fragments were separated by capillary electrophoresis in an ABI 3700 Applied Biosystems and analyzed with GeneMarker software (SoftGenetics, State College, USA). The presence of null alleles was tested in MICRO-CHECKER [37 (link)]. Estimates of expected heterozygosity (HE), allele richness (Rs), and private allele (P) were performed in FSTAT v 2.9.3.2 [38 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Molecular Identification of Fish Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 351 samples were collected between 1997 and 2011 (Fig. 1). The majority of these samples were collected by fishery observers from dead animals captured in regional fisheries using a variety of different capture techniques (i.e. longline, purse seine, gillnet). Additional samples were collected during NOAA research cruises and from sampling landings made by artisanal fishers. Collaborating institutions that aided in the collection of samples used in this study include; the National Marine Fisheries Service (USA), Incoder Subdirección de Pesca (Colombia), the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, the Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganaderia, Acuacultura, y Pesca (Ecuador), the Fisheries Research Institute (Taiwan). No Ethical Approval was required for this project since the samples were collected from dead animals already captured in commercial and recreational fishing activities.
Samples were identified by experts in the field and for the samples for which identification was uncertain, we implemented the molecular identification protocol described by Caballero et al.[12] (link). DNA was extracted by heating small pieces of tissue in 200 µl of 10% Chelex solution (BioRad) at 60°C for 20 minutes, then 103°C for 25 minutes followed by a brief centrifugation and storage at 4°C [15] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microsatellite Genotyping of Stickleback

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted for a total of 272 stickleback individuals which were in some cases caught earlier from the study sites (S2 Table). Extraction was done using 10% Chelex solution following the manufacturers protocol (Biorad, California, USA). Nine microsatellite markers were amplified in one multiplex kit. Detailed information on the marker identity, the multiplexing setup and the PCR protocol are described in [61 (link)]. Alleles were visualized on an ABI 3130XL and scored with GeneMapper 4.0 (Applied Biosystems, Switzerland). Using GenoDive 2.0 [62 ], deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were calculated using 10,000 bootstrap replicates. In addition, pairwise FST [63 (link)] between parapatric and allopatric lake and stream populations were calculated for all possible population combinations. Significances were estimated using 1000 bootstrapped replicates as implemented in GenoDive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mosquito Microsatellite Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from each mosquito (whole body) using 5% Chelex solution (BioRad), according to the manufacturer's recommendations and eluted in 200 μl of double-distilled water.
Ten microsatellite loci were genotyped (see Additional file
1). Eight of the primer pairs were originally described by Conn et al.[25 (link)]. Due to amplification problems, the primers of locus ADC107 were redesigned. Furthermore, primers for two additional loci (ADMP2 and ADMP9) were obtained from the GenBank sequences reported by Calvo et al.[26 (link)], both from 3’UTR of unknown transcripts. Each locus was amplified by PCR using fluorescently labelled (FAM, NED, or HEX; Applied Biosystems) reverse primers. PCR reactions were conducted in a 20-μl PCR mix containing 1× PCR GoTaq® Flexi Buffer (Promega), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.5 U of Taq polymerase and 1 μl of DNA template. Cycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing (52-57°C, Additional file
2) for 30 sec, elongation at 72°C for 35 sec; and a final extension step of 5–10 min at 72°C. Amplified fragments were separated by capillary electrophoresis in an automatic sequencer (ABI3730, Applied Biosystems) and sizes scored using the software GeneMarker (SoftGenetics) and GeneMapper (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The processed water samples were vacuum filtered through polyethersulfone membrane filters (0.22 µm pore size, 25 mm diameter; Whatman) and the filters were put into microcentrifuge tubes to extract bacterial DNA. Fish samples described above were centrifuged at 13 000 × g for 5 min and the pellets were used for template DNA preparation. Two hundred microliters of 2 × TZ buffer was added to microcentrifuge tubes containing a filter from the water samples or resuspended pellets from the fish samples. Six percent Chelex solution (Bio-Rad) was added and the microcentrifuge tubes were vortexed for 2 min. The tubes were boiled for 10 min, centrifuged at 10 000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatants were retained. The following precipitation processes of genomic DNA were the same as the DNA template preparation from the pure culture and the multiplex real-time PCR assay were decribed above. Quantification of Vibrio spp. and total bacteria were evaluated using the strandard curves as previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Extraction from Mites and Eggs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sampling, we stored adult males individually in 96% ethanol for preservation. Prior to DNA extraction, we evaporated the ethanol, and then transferred the mites into 1.5 ml tubes containing 50 μl of 5% Chelex solution (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and 3–4 zirconium beads. We homogenized samples for 20 s using a Precellys24 tissue homogenizer (Bertin Corp, Rockville, MD, USA), and added 2.5 μl of proteinase K (20 mg ml−1) to each sample, followed by incubation at 56 °C for 60 min, then denaturation of the proteinase at 95 °C for 8 min. We centrifuged samples at 14 000 rpm for 2 min, and stored them at -20 °C until amplification. We collected individual inviable eggs using an ethanol- and flame-sterilized pin, and crushed them in 10 μl of 5 × Phire buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a PCR tube. Samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 2 min and then stored at −20 °C. Prior to amplification, we pipetted the buffer-egg mix up and down to facilitate mixing of buffer and sample. To generate control samples for the PCR process, we followed the above processes without transferring a sample into the reaction medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Recombineering with pSIM6 in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recombineering experiments were performed using pSIM6 as described previously40 (link),41 (link). Briefly, the recombineering cassette was electroporated in an induced E. coli + pSIM6 strain. Then, cells were left to recover overnight at room temperature before plating on selective medium. Single isolated colonies were stabbed in a new plate before homogenization in 100 µL of 5% w/v Chelex solution (Bio-Rad). Afterwards, the Chelex mixture was heated to 56 °C for 25 min and 100 °C for 10 min in a PCR machine for DNA extraction. For PCR screening, 1 µL of freshly extracted DNA was added to the PCR mix. Positive clones were sub-cultured in 5 mL of selective LB broth overnight and frozen in 25% glycerol for storage. This protocol was applied to the deletion of the pilS in TP114 and the deletion of dapA in the chromosome of EcN, which are further described in the Supplementary methods section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from a small piece of cooked skeletal muscle tissue with a 10% Chelex solution (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA; Walsh, Metzger & Higuchi, 1991 (link)). Two gene regions were amplified separately with PCR: 350 bp of mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) and approximately 412 bp of 18S ribosomal RNA (18S) using L14841 and H15149 (Kocher et al., 1989 (link)) and 18R399 (Struck, Hessling & Purschke, 2002 (link)) and Small Subunit F (Englisch & Koenemann, 2001 (link)) primers, respectively. These primer pairs are identical to those used in the restriction digestion protocol used here for cytb (Tagliavini, Harrison & Gandolfi, 1995 ) and 18S (Frankowski & Bastrop, 2010 (link)). PCR reaction volumes were 18 µL and included 9 µL of 2x MyTaq Ready Mix (Bioline, Inc.), 6.4 µL of H2O, 0.3 µL of each primer (10 mM), and 2 µL DNA (approximately 50 ng/µL). The thermal cycling profile started with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 33 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for cytb and 52 °C for 18S for 30 s, with a slow ramp of 1 °C/s to an extension temperature at 72 °C for 3.5 min. The last cycle was followed by a single extension incubation at 72 °C for 5 min. All samples were successfully amplified. Amplification success was visualized on 1.5% agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Identification of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A loopful of 48 h culture of C. pseudotuberculosis was suspended in 6% Chelex-solution (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and then heated to 65°C for 30 min and to 100°C for 8 min; afterwards, it was centrifuged. The supernatant was collected in a new tube and stored at −20°C until use. Fragments of the selected housekeeping genes were amplified by PCR in an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The 25 μl amplification reaction mixture contained 1x Dream Taq Buffer, 200 nM dNTP-mix, 1 μM of each primer, 1 U Dream Taq (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), template DNA, and water. The PCR program included 3 min of initial denaturation at 95°C and then 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, at 60°C for 30, and at 72°C for 30 s and 7 min of the final elongation. PCR products were purified for direct sequencing using the Geneaid PCR purification Kit (Geneaid Biotech, New Taipei, Taiwan). Templates were sequenced with the PCR primers using the BigDye Terminator Ready Reaction Mix v3.1. Nucleotide sequences were run on an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction of C. perfringens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA extraction was carried out on the enterotoxigenic C. perfringens AHL 311 control strain and on the C. perfringens reference strain ATCC 13124 using the InstaGene matrix protocol with a 10% Chelex solution (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, ON, Canada) in water [19 (link)]. Briefly, the control and reference strains were subcultured on sheep blood agar plates (Oxoid, Toronto, ON, Canada) under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h. Ten to 15 colonies were recovered from each agar plate, and resuspended in 1 mL of sterile distilled water. The bacterial suspension was vortexed and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 3 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of a 10% Chelex solution. The microcentrifuge tubes were treated at 56 °C for 30 min on a hot plate, and were subsequently placed in boiling water at 100 °C for 10 min. After boiling, the bacterial suspension was vortexed and centrifuged at 13,000× g for 3 min. The resulting supernatant was collected and stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!