The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using rat anti mouse cd16 cd32 antibody

1

Flow Cytometric Analysis of BALF Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells collected from BALF and prepared for flow cytometric analysis as previously reported (16 (link)). Cells were suspended in 1 ml of 1× red blood cell lysis buffer (BD Biosciences, USA) for 5 minutes, then centrifuged at 250× g for 5 min. The supernatant containing BALF cells was resuspended in 100 μl PBS, then blocked with 0.5 μl of purified rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Biosciences, USA) for 10 min at 4°C. BALF cells were stained with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies: PerCP-Cy™ 5.5 rat anti-mouse CD45 antibody (0.5 μl, BD Biosciences, USA), PE anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (0.5 μl, BD Biosciences, USA), and Alexa Fluor 647 anti-mouse CCR2 (0.5 μl, Biolegend, USA) for 20 min at 4°C under darkness, then centrifuged at 250× g for 5 min. The supernatant was fixed with 100 μl of 2% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 10 min under darkness. After washing twice with PBS, samples were resuspended in 200 μl PBS, then analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences) using FlowJo analysis software (FlowJo, LLC, Ashland, Ore.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fc-gamma receptors were blocked with a rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD). Mouse-specific antibodies were the following: CD3-Brilliant violet 510, CD25-PercP Cy5.5, I-A/I-E-Brilliant violet 510, CD45R/B220-PE-Cy7, CD43-APC, CTLA-4-APC (all from BioLegend), CD4-APC-Cy7, CD69-PE, CD11c-PercP Cy5.5, CD19-APC-Cy7, CD40-FITC (all from BD Pharmingen), CD8α-PE-Cy7, FoxP3-FITC, CD86-APC, CD83-FITC, CD80-PE-Cy7, IgM-PercP-eFluor 710 (all from eBioscience).
During the experimental set-up, CD3 antibody was included in the staining panel (BV510 BioLegend clone 17A2) and used for the gating of T cells. The results obtained with gating on CD3+ CD4+ CD8- were similar to those obtained with gating on CD4+ CD8-. Due to the limitation in the maximum number of colours that can be discriminated with the FACS Canto II, CD3 staining was omitted in subsequent stainings.
Dead cells were excluded using the fixable viability dye-eFluor 450 (eBioscience), and intracellular staining was performed using the fixation/ permeabilization buffer set from eBioscience. Flow cytometry measurements were performed on a FACS Canto II instrument (BD) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors, bone marrow, spleen and lymph nodes were harvested into cold PBS, cut into pieces and mechanically disaggregated. Single cell suspensions were obtained by mechanical disaggregation of the specimens that after harvesting from mice were immediately transferred into PBS, cut into pieces and the obtained cell suspensions filtered through 50 μm cell strainers (BD Biosciences). After counting, cells were viably frozen in 10% DMSO in FBS. Thawed cells were washed in PBS and treated with Fc-blocking solution (rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody, BD Biosciences) followed by the incubation with directly-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): CD11b-PE (cat. 553311), Gr1-PE-Cy7 (cat. 552985) and CD45.2-PerCP-Cy5.5 (cat. 552950) from BD Biosciences. To stain FoxP3 cells were fixed and permeabilized using FoxP3 staining set (eBioscience) prior to the addition of the Foxp3-PE mAbs (cat.72-5775-40). Acquisition was performed by multi-color flow cytometry using a FACSCantoII with FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences), with dead cells exclusion based on scatter profile. FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) was used to analyze at least 100,000 events per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PUER cells were preincubated with Rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Biosciences Cat# 553141, RRID:AB_394656) to reduce nonspecific binding. Cells were stained with (Phycoerythrin)-CF594-conjugated anti-F4/80 (T45-2342; BD Biosciences Cat# 565613, RRID:AB_2734770) or Biotin-conjugated anti-Gr-1 (RB6-8C5; BD Biosciences Cat# 553124, RRID:AB_394640) monoclonal antibodies from BD Biosciences. Gr-1 primary incubation was followed by incubation with Allophycocyanin-conjugated Streptavidin (BD Biosciences Cat# 554067, RRID:AB_10050396). Stained cells were analyzed on a BDFACSymphony flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo, LLC). Positive fraction was estimated using FlowJo’s SE Dymax method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

BMDC Activation by AES and MES

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The harvested immature BMDCs generated above were cultivated in 6-well plates in complete RPMI-1640 medium with stimulation of AES (10 µg/mL) or MES (10 µg/mL) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 48–72 h. The same cell culture with 2 µg/mL LPS was used as a positive control and with bovine serum albumin (BSA) (10 µg/mL) (Thermo Fisher, Life Technologies) or PBS as a negative control. The stimulated BMDCs were washed and resuspended in 200 µL PBS containing 2 µL rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA, USA) for Fc receptors (FcR) block and then stained with P-phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-mouse CD11c antibodies (BD PharMingen) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-mouse CD80, CD86, CD40, or MHCII (BD PharMingen) for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. The cytokine levels in the BMDCs culture supernatants were determined by corresponding ELISA kits.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Macrophage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed twice in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended at 1 × 106 cells/ml in FACS buffer (PBS/0.1% NaN3/1% FBS). Cells were blocked with rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Biosciences) at 4°C for 5 min and then stained with fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse SR-AI, PE-conjugated anti-mouse LOX1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD36, FITC-conjugated CD11b, PE-conjugated anti-CD11b, PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD86, FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD4, PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a, FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD19, and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IA/IE (BD Biosciences) (all antibodies were diluted 1:100) for 30 min on ice in the dark. Matched isotype antibodies were used to show nonspecific binding. The cells were washed and resuspended in FACS buffer. A total of 10,000 events were acquired on a Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, La Brea, CA, USA), and the data were processed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Profiling Tumor Stromal Cells via Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed 21 PDXs in the stromal study (S1 Table). The single-cell suspensions generated by tissue dissociation were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Biosciences) at a concentration of 1 μg/106 cells in 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/ 5% fetal calf serum (FCS), to block nonspecific binding. The cells were then stained with the appropriate monoclonal antibodies (listed in S3 Table). The stained cells were washed twice with PBS/FCS. We added 2 ng/ml DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Invitrogen) to distinguish between live and dead cells. Data were acquired with a standard LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with 20 mW 488 nm, 20 mW 633 nm and 25 mW 406 nm lasers. We used the following filters for the measurement of fluorescence emission: 530/30 for FITC or AF488, 575/26 for PE, 610/20 for PE-TX Red, 660/20 for PE-Cy5, 695/40 for PerCP-Cy5.5 or PerCP-eFluor710, 780/60 for APC-Cy7, 660/30 for APC, 730/45 for AF700, 780/60 for APC-Cy7 and 450/50 for DAPI. Data were analyzed with FlowJo Software (Treestar, Ashland OR). For each model, we studied at least three tumors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis was performed as described previously (25 (link)). Briefly, tumor tissues were cut into pieces and digested with DMEM containing hyaluronidase (1.5 mg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), collagenase type 1A (1.5 mg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and deoxyribonuclease I (20 U/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at 37°C for 45 min. The tissue mixture was passed through a 70-µm nylon cell strainer to make single cell suspension, which was then washed and resuspended in cold flow buffer (1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% NaN3 in PBS). After being blocked with a rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Pharmingen, USA), the following fluorochrome-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies were used: CD45-BV421, CD11b-BV510, CD8a-PE-Cy7, CD4-PE, CD25-APC, NK1.1-APC-Cy7, F4/80-FITC, CD206-PE-Cy7, CD11c-APC, and Gr-1-APC-Cy7 (all from BioLegend, USA). 7-Amino-actinomycin D (7AAD) (eBioscience, USA) was used as a viability dye to exclude dead cells. Flow cytometric data were collected using a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman, USA) and analyzed using the Kaluza software (version 1.3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of Aortic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were euthanized with inhaled isoflurane overdose and the circulatory system was cleared by perfusion with PBS. Aortas were dissected and incubated with collagenase type II (175 U/ml) to remove adventitia. Aortas were minced and placed into an enzyme cocktail (collagenase type I 450 U/ml, collagenase type XI 125 U/ml, hyaluronidase 60 U/ml). Cell suspension was passed through a 70 µM cell strainer (Corning, Corning, NY) and washed with FACS buffer (PBS, 1% BSA, 1 mM EDTA). Samples were fixed and permeabilized with Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (Thermo Fisher). Cells were blocked with rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Biosciences) and stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD68 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) and FITC-conjugated anti-α-smooth muscle actin (Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies for 45 min 4 °C. The samples were run on MoFlo Astrios EQ (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN) and data were analyzed with FlowJo v10 (FlowJo, LLC, Stanford University, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Quantification of p47phox and p22phox

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pMø fixed with 2% PFD were washed three times with 0.1% PBS-Tween (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 30 min on ice with 0.1% PBS-Tween20 containing purified rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (BD Biosciences) at a dilution of 1:200 and 5% goat serum for p47phox or 5% donkey serum for p22phox staining, to block Fcγ receptors. After three washes with 0.1% PBS-Tween-20, the cells were incubated with α-p47phox (H-195) or α-p22phox (C-17) at a dilution of 1:100 in 0.1% PBS-Tween-20 containing 1% BSA. After 2 h of incubation, the cells were washed three times with 0.1% PBS-Tween-20 and incubated for 1 h in the dark with 0.1% PBS-Tween-20 containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 1:1,000 dilution of Alexa Fluor®488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, by Thermo Fisher Scientific) for p47phox or Alexa Fluor®488 donkey anti-goat IgG (Invitrogen) for p22phox staining. Slides were then washed twice with 0.1% PBS-Tween-20 followed by last wash with PBS. Finally, all the coverslips were mounted with DAPI-mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Confocal microscopy was performed using an oil immersion 60× objective on the Nikon A1 microscope. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was measured as the mean gray value of the maximum projection using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!